Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
草
@GrassEverywhere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002322273724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GrassEverywhere |
| Description | 因为草w 不代表本频道观点喵 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GrassEverywhere |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 84.4%
- avg views ÷ 18 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.2
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 243 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 321
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 182
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://fixupx.com/joomy/status/2086279136608199158
Photo, posted without a caption
为全面落实科技语言本土化要求,公司决定对现有技术栈(Technology Stack)进行彻底整改: 码头工人(Docker)取代容器运行平台,舵手集群(Kubernetes)取代容器编排系统,集装箱(Container)取代容器,豆荚(Pod)取代最小调度单元,树枝(Branch)取代代码分支,餐叉(Fork)取代代码派生,拉取申请(Pull Request)取代代码合并请求,程序虫害(Bug)取代软件缺陷,热修补丁(Hotfix)取代紧急修复,高速暂存间(Cache)取代缓存,看门狗(Watchdog)取代故障监控,守护精灵(Daemon)取代后台常驻程序。 考虑到不同领域长期存在译名混乱,公司另行规定:所有词元(Token)无论用途,一律翻译为“词元”。 自此,用户登录时需要提交身份词元(Identity Token),接口调用需要携带访问词元(Access Token),大模型回答问题需要消耗推理词元(Token)…
我不行了 你们都这么写路由的吗
为防止水群太多智力减退,请完成以下数学题: 一组小朋友在一起玩耍,他们人数不止2个人,但分成每两人一组之后没有多余的人。请证明可以把他们分成两个神奇的小组,每组的人数都无法分成人数相等的多人小组。
RTOS 要点:叮咚鸡(指等中断),大狗叫(看门狗),一段一段待一段(指优先级调度)
为什么广西日报特稿《王的猜想》能获得这么多认同? 知乎
https://fxtwitter.com/starryskyovo/status/2082709987214925835
Photo, posted without a caption
欧盟展开对北京烤鸭的反倾销调查。 https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/07/09/eu-to-probe-chinese-pekin-duck-imports-as-market-flooding-row-hots-up
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GrassEverywhere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“草” (@GrassEverywhere), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GrassEverywhere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.