Channel
@blog_0i7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002266141639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blog_0i7 |
| Description | c04的公开频道，较熟可申请置顶私有频道，按情况审核 https://t.me/+132aqDu3C242MTI9 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blog_0i7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 54 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 243 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
苹果回应删除接入千问手册：没收到通知，中国大陆还没推出“Apple 智能使用千问”功能 针对删除《在 Mac 上配合 Apple 智能使用千问》使用文档一事，苹果客服最新回应新浪科技称：“我们有功能或新项目发布时，都会提前收到通知，目前并没有收到相关通知，中国大陆还没推出‘Apple 智能使用千问’相关功能。”昨日，一篇名为《在 Mac 上配合 Apple 智能使用千问》的支持文档现身苹果官网 Mac 简体中文使用手册，明确提到 Apple 智能可配合阿里巴巴千问模型工作。但该文发布不到 24 小时后被苹果方面删除。今年 7 月 15 日，阿里巴巴方面曾回应称，千问将作为 AI 能力集成至 Apple 智能，覆盖 iOS、iPadOS、macOS 及 visionOS 的中国用户。（新浪科技）
如厕时请勿使用手机 原文：https://nate.spot/no-phone-while-poop/ 阅读时间：1 分钟 分数：163
1000公里以内最好的高铁站#禹城东站#遥遥领先 #啊啊啊啊这个这个 @高育良
https://fixvx.com/show5560/status/2085455875385544708?s=46
好了这下Clash Verge都上央视了 消息来源——央视新闻《从追赶到领跑 中国开源模型深度融入实体经济》相关报道 1:49
https://fixupx.com/safaricheung/status/2085250333052481623
艹，梁神 牛的，梁圣 可以的，梁叔 怎么回事，梁子 ← 你现在在这！ 你tm是人吗，梁西匹
我不行了 你们都这么写路由的吗
https://fixvx.com/__fanqie__/status/2084930967328985370?s=46
竹知了— 一转就哇哇叫，在线转竹知了🤣 https://zhuzhiliao.imsai.cc/
what？！
《巫师 3：狂猎》“旧时曲”DLC 将亮相科隆游戏展 2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @blog_0i7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“blog@0i7” (@blog_0i7), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blog_0i7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.