Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Деньги без дураков

Channel

Деньги без дураков

@Dengi_bez_Durakoff

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,202subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605390297
TypeChannel
Username@Dengi_bez_Durakoff
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dengi_bez_Durakoff

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,18112,21212,196.56 August 2026 — 12,203 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,193 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,192 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,184 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,188 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,193 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,190 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,198 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,194 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,196 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,190 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,189 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,193 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,187 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,182 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,181 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,192 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,195 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,194 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,193 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,197 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,198 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,190 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,193 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,204 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,205 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,212 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,207 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,192 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,190 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,202 subscribers12,2026 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,176–12,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:3712,202+12
16 Sept 2026, 13:5812,190-2
14 Sept 2026, 21:2012,192-15
13 Sept 2026, 06:5812,207-5
11 Sept 2026, 07:3612,212+7
8 Sept 2026, 10:4012,205+1
5 Sept 2026, 07:5712,204+11
3 Sept 2026, 15:0112,193+3
2 Sept 2026, 10:3612,190-8
1 Sept 2026, 08:1412,198+1
30 Aug 2026, 05:1312,197+4
29 Aug 2026, 07:5312,193-1
28 Aug 2026, 09:2712,194-1
27 Aug 2026, 12:0812,195+3
26 Aug 2026, 09:4312,192+11
25 Aug 2026, 09:0312,181-1
24 Aug 2026, 08:3512,182-5
22 Aug 2026, 17:1412,187-6
21 Aug 2026, 05:1812,193+4
20 Aug 2026, 07:3512,189first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 12,202 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held38 (10 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total9,620
Reactions total191
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,996 reactions across 36 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,08454.3%
29814.9%
🔥1839.17%
😁1266.31%
🤝804.01%
793.96%
🤣281.40%
🤔261.30%
🙏241.20%
❤‍🔥150.752%
💯150.752%
👌100.501%
👏50.251%
🥱50.251%
30.15%
🤬30.15%
🫡30.15%
👎20.1%
😈20.1%
😭20.1%
3 further kinds30.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.63%
1 of 38 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,370
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,160
over 37 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvEa9p6127 July 202627 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 05:03 UTC≈1,360 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Рубрика «Вопрос — ответ» «Где вы там неэффективности рынка находите все? Я что не тестировал, у меня был результат либо 50/50, либо если стратегия работает, то чуть лучше индекса полной дохи, но добавь комис и выгода от телодвижений уйдет». Попробуйте все же затестить моментум и валютные трендовухи. Это самое простое, грубое и надежное, что я знаю. За что и самое любимое… *** «Как вы думаете, российский рынок

👍244🔥31🤔1🤝1🙏1

31 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC≈1,930 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026

У многих людей есть представления, что на бирже легко и что сложно. Например, есть такое расхожее представление, что легко определить, какой сейчас тренд (шаг 1), и превратить это знание в деньги (шаг 2). И действовать надо именно так. Сначала разобраться с трендом, откуда он и куда придет. Потом ухватить его, собаку, за хвост и проехаться. Что проще-то? По мне — задача архисложная, часто и вовсе невыполнимая. Чист

👍33144🤔2🤝1🙏1

28 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC≈2,910 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Рубрика "Вопрос - ответ" «Какие мысли по юаню на ближайший месяц?» Как всегда, никаких. Алгошники потому и зарабатывают, что не строят прогнозов и не имеют мнений, а тупо играют умную статистическую модель. Мы же не аналитики, к счастью, нам каждый день думать не надо. Или притворяться, что думаешь... *** «Александр, а как Вам идея создать закрытый канал для инвесторов и выкладывать раз в месяц портфель по момен

👍2032🙏2🤝1

26 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC≈3,420 views73 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Что не до конца понимают адепты пассивных инвестиций в критике более активных подходов (от трейдинга до сток-пикинга)? Ну или делают вид, что не понимают? «Рано или поздно все ваши модельки, скорее всего, перестанут работать!» - заявляют они и все, спор закончен, для них это победа. Так я же согласен. Конечно, рано или поздно все мои модельки перестанут работать. Вопрос не в этом. Вопрос в том, каковы: 1). Вероя

👍39🤝1511🔥6🤔2

24 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈3,940 views50 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Добрые люди поделились ссылкой на пост, где очень сурово про автоследование вообще, но очень хорошо про меня в частности t.me/Finindie/2916 . Там автор (Александр Елисеев, он же Фининди) год назад зафиксировал два топа от Т-инвестиций. 6 лучших стратегий по версии самого сервиса. И просто 6 лучших по доходности. Спустя год он посчитал результаты, если коротко: «Выбор Т-Инвестиций: ▪ Только 2 стратегии из 6 показ

👍23🔥1383🤝3

21 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC≈4,010 views77 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Есть очень сильная корреляция, видел много раз — чем больше у трейдера денег или опыта, тем меньше там риски. Меньше плечо (если оно вообще есть), меньше часть капитала, выделяемая на трейдинг. Математически это грех. Грубо говоря, если твой трейдинг дает в среднем 40% годовых, а депозит сейчас дает 20%, зачем делить капитал между ними пополам? Неси все туда, где 40%. Но ситуация может быть еще смешнее. Инвестицион

👍5015❤‍🔥5🤝5🔥1🤔1

19 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈3,790 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣21👍103👌1

19 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC≈3,880 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Подписчики опять делятся, новая волна от жуликов пошла. Я, наверное, уже достал всех в канале с этими скринами. Но может, паре человек это сбережет денег. Сделать тут ничего нельзя, увы, только в энный раз упредить: я ничего и никогда не пишу своим подписчикам первый. Если получили такое, сразу в бан.⬇️

👍158🫡2

19 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC≈4,130 views83 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В итоге, когда мой портфель летел к черту, у нее он состоял примерно на 50% из дочек Россетей, летящих туда же, но медленнее, и на 50% из фонда ликвидности, приятно растущего. Вот такое объяснение волшебства. Мораль этой истории: от удачи на финрынке зависит куда больше, чем принято думать. Можно сделать два равно нормальных портфеля, но один звезданется с обрыва, а второй воспарит над ним. Новичок скажет: фу, надо

👍5512💯82🤔2🤝2🙏2

19 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC≈3,930 views72 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Недавно в Пульсе пришел вопрос, ответ на который стоит отдельного поста. Ибо позволяет проговорить важную вещь. Вопрос такой: «знакомы с портфелем Ари Евчук? Почему у нее результат лучше?» Маленький лайфхак: если хотите проверить качество автора, смотрите, как он отвечает на вот такие вопросы. То есть явно критичные, но заданные вежливо и по делу. Человек не хотел обидеть, ему, скорее всего, реально нужен ответ...

👍4014🔥1311👌1🤔1🙏1

17 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈3,520 views110 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Не помню, упоминал ли — совершенно равнодушен к компьютерным играм. Вижу этому красивое объяснение (не уверен, кстати, что истинное — просто оно красивое и мне нравится). Оговорюсь, чисто теоретически я к ним отношусь очень хорошо. По убеждениям я скорее крайний игрофил, нежели игрофоб. Я согласен, что игры скорее развивают, чем наоборот, и все, что можно — надо максимально геймифицировать. Например, систему образо

👍65🔥2011😁8🤝21💯1🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈4,290 views93 reactionsread 2 September 2026

А между тем великая реформа автоследования прошла в Т-банке с 12 августа. В стратегиях стали указываться доходности не авторов, а подписчиков. То есть доходность минус комиссии и проскользывания. Много лет многие говорили, что пора бы. Вот. Сделали. Какой вообще основной упрек к автоследу, если по уму и по совести? Причем к любому? Что доходность авторского счета всегда выше доходности подписчика — это понятно, и

👍68🤝1087

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @Dengi_bez_Durakoff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Фининди | Александр Елисеев
@Finindie · 72,841
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 99,279
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 August 2026
Движение FIRE
@wkpbro · 28,517
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
📚 Доказательное Инвестирование
@invest_science_channel · 38,500
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский
@RationalAnswer · 107,884
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Простая экономика
@prostoecon · 295,976
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin
@mtokovinin · 108,209
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
На пенсию в 35 лет
@pensiya35 · 123,937
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
Математик в Лондоне
@mathbotan · 26,819
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Упал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина
@ruminblog · 63,983
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Деньги без дураков” (@Dengi_bez_Durakoff), 12,202 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dengi_bez_Durakoff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.