Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 49 days, net -62,714. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 573,712–655,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 15:57
583,119
-6,382
19 Sept 2026, 04:41
589,501
-1,579
17 Sept 2026, 16:39
591,080
-1,062
16 Sept 2026, 16:00
592,142
-944
15 Sept 2026, 17:41
593,086
-991
14 Sept 2026, 20:38
594,077
-920
13 Sept 2026, 23:58
594,997
-745
13 Sept 2026, 08:17
595,742
-1,129
12 Sept 2026, 03:19
596,871
-607
11 Sept 2026, 12:38
597,478
-1,638
9 Sept 2026, 23:20
599,116
-1,336
8 Sept 2026, 19:59
600,452
-2,604
6 Sept 2026, 13:37
603,056
-1,056
5 Sept 2026, 15:20
604,112
-1,794
4 Sept 2026, 06:01
605,906
-505
3 Sept 2026, 17:18
606,411
-873
2 Sept 2026, 22:24
607,284
-1,133
2 Sept 2026, 06:52
608,417
-601
1 Sept 2026, 17:16
609,018
-636
1 Sept 2026, 07:36
609,654
first reading
Engagement
978 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.471%
avg views ÷ 583,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,740
537 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
537
of 978 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 536 of 537 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
978 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,473,326
Reactions total
123,803
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,010
Videos
≈204
Links
≈1,180
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
174,320 reactions across 977 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
56,655
32.5%
🔥
54,129
31.1%
😍
53,357
30.6%
❤🔥
6,268
3.60%
🐳
3,050
1.75%
🤔
456
0.262%
🤩
253
0.145%
😢
152
0.087%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 977 of the 978 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174,320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 978 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 978 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradersho. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 978 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📊تحلیل NEAR
نیر فعلاً روی خط روند صعودی خودش قرار داره و همزمان داره یک الگو میسازه؛ هرچند توی حرکتهای اخیرش کمی ضعف دیده میشه.✔️
اگه قیمت الگوی مشخصشده روی چارت رو به بالا بشکنه، میتونیم دوباره حرکت به سمت ۵.۴۰ دلار رو بررسی کنیم. 💹
👈 این سناریو تا وقتی معتبره که قیمت بالای ۴.۴۰ دلار بمونه. از دست رفتن این محدوده یعنی باید تحلیل رو دوباره بررسی کنیم.
📊تحلیل بیتکوین
بیتکوین فعلا رنج سنگینه و سطح دیروز مارو فیک کرده.
خروج از این باکس رو با تریگر هایی که مشخص کردم فقط با کلوز کندل 4 ساعته ترید کنید✔️
دقت کنید الان ناحیه مهم تصمیم گیریه و مرز بین بازار صعودی و نزولیه، یعنی بشکنه بالا چرخه توی هفتگی هم صعودی میشه و اگه ریجکت بشه پایین هم کلا مقاومت هفتگی فیک شده و میریم برای ریزش.🕯
برای همین احتمال فیک زدن و نوسانات رفت و برگشتی زیاده و بهتره روی بیت زیاد پوزیشن ن…
📊مارکت امروز
هفته ای پر تلاطم برای بیت تموم شد و فعلا یکی دو روزی میشه رنج شده...🕯
طلای 18 عیار و دلار هم تغییرات بخصوصی نداشتن و فعلا توی بازار ها همه چیز آرومه👀
📊تحلیل اتریوم
🕯اتریوم روی ناحیه مهم تصمیم گیریه.
📌داره توی تایم فریم 1 ساعته سقف های پایین تر میزنه و سعی داره ساختار نزولی بگیره.
فعلا تریگری برای شورت نداره چون ریسکیه اما برای لانگ میتونیم با شکست ترند نزولی و کلوز و تثبیت بالای 2719 بریم برای لانگش✔️
👍91🔥73😍59🐳2
Showing the 12 most recent of 978 posts we hold for @tradersho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 978 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
رسانه مردمی | اخبار جنگ @resane_mardomy · 144,313 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
مسترنت || MesterNet | فیلترشکن | VPN @Mester_Net · 21,464 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 23 September 2026
AlvandCrypto | اخبار کریپتو @AlvandCrypto · 33,665 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 September 2026
میلی تک | Militech @militech_ir · 100,772 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
فیلترشکن V2ray تست رایگان @Vpn_Red_P · 61,615 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 26 August 2026
𝐓𝐎𝐎𝐁𝐈𝐓𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐑 @ToobitPersianIr · 123,284 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
WALL STREET🐳 @Wall_Team · 37,056 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
🤑IRANET PROXY🤑 @iranetproxy · 34,437 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
Coinlocally | کوین لوکالی @coin_locally · 230,893 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
مهدیه ترید | Mahdiye Trade @MahdiyeTrade · 196,213 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
𝐁𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 | بیت وان @bit_1ch · 87,284 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 August 2026
Blue Moon @bluemoon · 34,883 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 2 September 2026
IranProxy | ایران پروکسی @iranproxy · 377,175 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 1 September 2026
Weex 🏦 صرافی ویکس @WeexPro · 72,430 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
دلقک نباشیم @DontBeAnClown · 149,535 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Lord Crypto | سیگنال کریپتو @lordcryptovip · 802,622 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
RegaPlus @RegaPlus · 1,474,377 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 August 2026
𝘾𝙍𝙔𝙋𝙏𝙊 𝙆𝙄𝙄𝙇𝙀𝙍 | سیگنال رایگان ارز دیجیتال اموزش ترید ایردراپ اموزشات الترای لورد معتبر اموزش اسپات و فیوچرز تریدینگ @cryptokiilerr · 30,923 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Lord Auto trade bot💣👽لورد کریپتو بات|سیگنال رایگان|کریپتو |signal|ارزدیجیتال|ترید|ارزدیجیتال|ایردراپ| اموزشات الترای لورد @lordcryptovipbot · 25,723 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
قیمت دلار ، خودرو ، طلا و موبایل | امروز چنده @EmroozChande · 90,817 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026
𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄 𝐅𝐗 | سیگنال رایگان ، فارکس @WhAleir_fx · 649,790 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
HotLove @HotLove · 78,456 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 25 August 2026
🔱 Traders 30T (شهر معامله گران) 🔱 @traderz30t · 190,965 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Fweeter @Fweeter · 62,151 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تریدرشو | Shahriyar 🚀” (@tradersho), 583,119 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradersho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.