Channel
@gocasts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,081subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001262572354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gocasts |
| Description | Ex Snapp! Senior Software Engineer فوق لیسانس هوش مصنوعی از دانشگاه تهران اشتراک محتوا در مورد مهندسی نرم افزار، هوش مصنوعی، گولنگ https://gocasts.ir پروفایل https://www.linkedin.com/in/gohossein ارتباط @lifography Ai for Software @aicasts_ir |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gocasts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 8,081 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 8,074 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 8,072 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (30 April 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,724 |
| Reactions total | 451 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
797 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 483 | 60.6% | |
| 👍 | 261 | 32.7% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 4.89% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.878% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.502% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.376% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 797reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
گوگل امروز پستی منتشر کرده با این ادعا که Go برای توسعهی AI-assisted زبان ایدهآلیه. نکات مهم مقاله و یه سری نکاتی که برای توسعه agentic میتونه مفید باشه رو در این پست میتونید بخونید. 🔗 https://gocasts.ir/why-go-is-an-ideal-language-for-ai-assisted-development/ Ai for Software @aicasts_ir Agentic Dev Circle Group @agenticdevcircle @gocasts
🔥9❤5
راننده کامیون محله مون روزی پنج-شیش میلیون پول تبلیغات میده که شاید یه بار ۲۰ تومنی گیرش بیاد، دوستش گفت این که قماره، اگه بار گیرت نیاد چی، کل تبلیغات ت سوخت میشه، ولی چاره ای نیست، اگه تبلیغ نکنه بار گیرش نمیاد... ولو اینکه در ماه چندین روز هم پول تبلیغاتش سوخت بشه. به هر حال اگه بخواد تو حرفهاش بمونه باید این هزینهای که بهش تحمیل شده رو بپردازه حالا حکایت ما و ai هم همینه... همه مون کلی خرج ریز و درشت تو زندگی…
👍33❤16
با GPT Sol و Claude Fable که کار میکنی کلا خالی میشی از درون... هر چقدر تلاش میکنی که بتونی به هر حال یه جای پروسه تاثیرگذار باشی که افتخار کنی به خودت تقریبا وجود نداره! تجربههای ۲۰ دلاری ای که ما داریم شوخی ای بیش نیست و صرفا جهت مزه مزه کردن به کار میاد. اکانتهای ۱۰۰ دلاری به بالارو باید تجربه کرد که قدرت اصلی agentها در توسعه روزمره مشخص بشه. هر چقدر تلاش میکنی که یه طوری پروژه رو از اول ساختار بدی که مسلط…
❤103👍21🤝3👏1🔥1
جلسه مشاوره و ریویو سه نفره: من و Claude و ChatGPT تجربه مثبتی بود از اینکه ایجنت های Claude و ChatGPT رو همزمان استفاده کردم برای نقد سیستم. مثل این میمونه دو تا مشاور سنیور رو به جلسه دعوت کنی و آزادانه و بیرحمانه بخوای ازشون سیستم ت رو نقد کنن. اینطوری بود که یه ریویو مشترک رو مستقلا دادم هر دوتاشون انجام بدن و فایل گزارش ش رو بنویسن. بعد گزارش هر کدوم رو دادم اون یکی هم نقد کنه و با گزارش خودش مقایسه کنه. در نه…
❤33🔥2👍1
بچه های ایرانیکارت، گمونم دیشب یه دیپلوی رفتید سر هر سفارش داره تا بی نهایت پیامک میفرسته! ریورت کنید تا فاکتور پیامک سر به فلک نکشیده تو ۱۲ ساعت گذشته برای من حداقل ۱۵۰ یا ۲۰۰ بار پیامک اومده احتمالا تو گلوی broker گیر میکنه، ارسال پیامک رو ack نمیده برمیگرده تو صف... نمیدونم چیه ولی هر چی هست چکش کنید لطفا دسترسی مستقیم نداشتم گفتم اینجا پیام بذارم شاید دیده بشه
👍43❤9😍2
یه گروه زدم برای تبادل نظر و گفتگو در مورد ai agentها هم برای practiceهای توسعه agentic و هم مهندسی ai agentها در پروداکشن. دوست داشتید عضو بشید. این مشخصات گروهه Agentic Dev Circle @agenticdevcircle @gocasts
❤9👍3
یکی از بچههای GoCasts پلتفرم آموزشی خودش رو راهاندازی کرده تمایل داشتید دورههاش رو بررسی کنید و حمایت کنید. https://learnpath.ir/ کانال تلگرامش @learnpath_ir کانال بله https://ble.ir/learnpath_ir/-5397442306485142270/1777105806561 @gocasts
❤25😍2
هوش مصنوعی گند زده به همه چیز پیدا کردن مقاله فنی خوب از حفاری در معدن داره سختتر میشه قبلا پیدا کردن مقالات فنی و تکنیکال ناب کار خیلی راحتتری بود. به جرأت میتونم بگم اکثر مقالاتی که در مورد ایجنتهای هوش مصنوعی میبینم هیچ بار فنی ای نداره٬ صرفا یا داره تنظیم کردن یه ابزار رو نشون میده یا اینکه چطوری پرامپت بنویسی یا ورکفلو بسازی که فلان کارو بهتر انجام بده. آدم حالش بد میشه از حجم زیاد این دسته از محتوا چیزی که…
❤52👍39👏2
دیروز از ChatGPT و Claude پرسیدم بهم چندتا فریمورک توسعه وب معرفی کنه که برای توسعه agentic مناسب باشه و جالب بود که هر دوتاشون گزینه اولشون Ruby on Rails بود! فریمورک Rails احتمالاً بهترین مصداق Convention over Configuration محسوب میشه. این قضیه برای Agent خیلی مهمه؛ چون به جای تصمیمگیری درباره معماری، بیشتر انرژیاش رو روی requirement میذاره. کانونشنهای قوی Rails باعث میشه برای ابزارهای AI نسبتاً قابل پیشبینی …
👍22❤15
فارست گامپ نباشیم! بنظرم یکی از مهمترین وجه تمایزهای مهندسین نرم افزار در عصر ai اعتماد به نفس هست. منظورم اعتماد به نفس واقعی هست نه کاذب. بیزینس ها به آدمایی اعتماد میکنن که تجربه داشته باشن، خود اون شخص هم در صورتی به خودش اطمینان داره که اعتماد به نفس برخواسته از تجربه داشته باشه، نه توهم توانستن... حتی اگه خودمون هم بخوایم برای آینده خودمون سرمایه گذاری کنیم احتمالا روی مسیری این کارو میکنیم که تجربه ای داشته ب…
❤52👍17👏4
تخفیف ۵۰ درصدی دورههای سیستم دیزاین و هنرکدنویسی از اخر همین هفته (۲۶ تیرماه) برداشته میشه. دوره سیستم دیزاین ۳ لایو از هفته مرداد شروع میشه. دورههای سیستم دیزاین ۱ و ۲ و هنر کدنویسی به صورت ویدیو قابل ثبت نام هستن. بعد ثبت نام به گروه خصوصی بچهها اضافه میشین و می تونید توی جلسات انلاین کد ریووو و حل مشکل شرکت کنید (برای بچههایی که یک رو دارن میخوان بیان ۲ یا هنوز ثبت نام نکردن) بچههایی که قصد ثبت نام دارن ای…
❤5🔥1
چند ماه پیش حسم این بود که ما به دوره disposable code میرسیم، شاید کمی اغراق آمیز باشه، اما چنین نشونه هایی ثابت میکنه که خیلی دور از ذهن هم نیست. ابزاری که یک تیم در طول یک سال نوشتن رو یک مهندس در کنار ۵۰ تا ورکفلو داینامیک claude fable در ۱۱ روز بصورت موفقیت آمیز rewrite کرده. نوشتن ۱۳۰۰ خط کد در دقیقه به اندازه کافی سریعه و الان بیش از این که لازم باشه نوشتن کد سریع بشه، بقیه فرآیندهای توسعه هم باید سریع بشن، از …
👍38❤14🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @gocasts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 392,799 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Go Casts 🚀” (@gocasts), 8,081 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gocasts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.