Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Go Casts | Systems & Agents 🚀

Channel

Go Casts | Systems & Agents 🚀

@gocasts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,565subscribers

+2,493 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262572354
TypeChannel
Username@gocasts
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/gocasts

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,07210,6219,346.56 August 2026 — 8,072 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,074 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,081 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,088 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,099 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,107 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,129 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,127 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,123 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,125 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,117 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,113 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,785 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,278 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,918 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,972 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,339 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,354 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,358 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,357 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,355 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,345 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,344 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,332 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,314 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,305 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,394 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,428 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,578 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,614 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,620 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,621 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,614 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,615 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,607 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,606 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,601 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,595 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,590 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,583 subscribers10 November 2026 — 10,574 subscribers11 November 2026 — 10,565 subscribers10,5656 August 202611 November 2026
42 measurements spanning 97 days, net +2,493. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,690–11,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 23:1710,565-9
10 Nov 2026, 01:5010,574-9
8 Nov 2026, 15:0210,583-7
7 Nov 2026, 08:4610,590-5
6 Nov 2026, 11:1510,595-6
5 Nov 2026, 09:3010,601-5
4 Nov 2026, 06:4410,606-1
3 Nov 2026, 09:3410,607-8
1 Nov 2026, 06:3610,615+1
31 Oct 2026, 04:3110,614-7
30 Oct 2026, 06:3610,621+1
29 Oct 2026, 07:3810,620+6
28 Oct 2026, 06:3810,614+36
27 Oct 2026, 04:4710,578+150
26 Oct 2026, 05:5010,428+34
25 Oct 2026, 02:2010,394+89
24 Oct 2026, 03:3910,305-9
23 Oct 2026, 06:5010,314-18
22 Oct 2026, 05:2510,332-12
21 Oct 2026, 01:4010,344first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.5%
avg views ÷ 10,565 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,810
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.876%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held47 (30 April 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total33,670
Reactions total295
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,911 reactions across 47 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,08256.6%
👍59831.3%
🔥1548.06%
👏633.30%
🎉60.314%
😍40.209%
🤝40.209%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,911 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (42.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 08:26 UTC≈1,880 views50 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

امروز با یه اپلیکیشن خیلی خوب آشنا شدم برای فهم عمیق پروتکل های شبکه. پروتکل رو انتخاب میکنی و بصورت visualize بهت نشون میده پشت صحنه در شبکه چه اتفاقی میفته. شاید در نگاه اول خیلی اهمیت نداشته باشه اما همین مباحث خیلی وقتا سوال مصاحبه های مهندسی نرم افزار هستن. اینطور مفاهیم چیزی نیستن که با اومدن هوش مصنوعی اهمیتشون کم شده باشه، اهمیتشون بیشترم شده. https://protocol-explorer-alpha.vercel.app/ @gocasts

👍30❤17🔥3

10 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC≈2,210 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026

من تقریبا چند ساله (حتی قبل از ai) به همین شیوه ریویو می‌کنم. در ۳ یا ۴ سال گذشته کمتر پیش اومده که یه کد رو خط به خط ریویو کرده باشم. بیشترین توجه‌م حین ریویو کردن MR/PR موارد high-level هست مگه اینکه یه کدی صراحتا تمرکزش روی موارد low-level بوده باشه مثلا بخواد بهینه‌سازی یه قسمت از کد رو انجام بده که اونجا روی کد خط به خط ریز میشم. ولی در اکثر موارد (و مخصوصا وقتی که MR/PR بزرگ باشه) سعی می‌کنم موارد high-level ر…

👍13❤12

2 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC≈3,450 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @mindfulsoftPhoto

دانشجو که بودم، لیست کتاب‌هایی که باید می‌خوندم هیچ‌وقت تموم نشد. حتی Design Patterns رو هم که خوندم، بعدش نتونستم پترن‌هاش رو درست به کار ببرم. این روزا با این حجم از محتوا توی یوتیوب و شبکه‌های اجتماعی و این‌همه تکنولوژی، غرق شدن و مسیر بهینه رو پیدا نکردن خیلی راحت تره :) خیلی از بچه‌ها ازم می پرسن چطوری این همه چیزو یاد بگیریم؟ چطوری تو مسیر شخصی یا کاری‌مون رشد کنیم؟ این وبینار برای همه ماست تا تجربیات‌مون رو…

❤38🔥8

27 Oct 2026, 13:35 UTC≈5,830 views46 reactionsread 11 November 2026

اگه یه مهارت باشه که لازمه به خودمون اضافه کنیم تا ریسک شغلی مون کمتر بشه مهارت بررسی و investigate کردن proactive محصول برای بهبودشه. یعنی صبر نکنیم تا یکی بهمون بگه چی بسازیم و خودمون دنبال مشکل ها و فرصت های بهبود محصول بگردیم. معمولا ما که سابقه کاری مون بیشتر مهندسی نرم افزار و برنامه نویسیه این یه زمین بازی کاملا جدیده و تجربه مون توش کمه. برای اینکه یاد بگیریم چطور این کارو بکنیم خوندن این مطالب میتونه مفید …

❤30👍15🎉1

25 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC≈6,290 views74 reactionsread 11 November 2026

این روزها زیاد می‌پرسن «با این همه ایجنت و Claude Code، هنوز لازمه کدنویسی رو از پایه یاد بگیریم؟» جواب من آره‌ست، و به نظرم الان حتی مهم‌تر از قبله. بحث این نیست که به قول Boris Cherny کد «حل شده» یا نه. بحث اینه که ذهن ما چیزی رو یاد می‌گیره که براش زحمت کشیده باشه. وقتی خودت با یه باگ کلنجار می‌ری یا یه الگوریتم رو قدم‌به‌قدم می‌نویسی، حتی روی کاغذ، داری مهارت حل مسئله و فهم سیستمی رو می‌سازی. دانشگاه آکسفورد یه و…

❤47👍27

21 Oct 2026, 18:00 UTC≈7,040 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

سلام دوستان گویا یه آسیب پذیری جدی php پیدا شده دیروز (اسمش php2shell هست). https://nsin.ir/blog/php2shell-cve-2026-109618-protection/ بچه های انسین میگن ما تشخیص ش میدیم روی wafمون. براتون قانون WAF ای ایجاد میکنن که جلوی اینگونه حملات رو میگیره. رایگانه. nsin.ir @nsin_ir @gocasts

❤5👍4

19 Oct 2026, 09:14 UTC≈6,970 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

دزدی هم مقیاس‌پذیر شده! هوش مصنوعی فقط برنامه‌نویس‌ها و کسب‌وکارها را توانمند نمی‌کنه؛ دست کلاهبردارها رو هم برای فریب گسترده‌تر، سریع‌تر و ارزون‌تر باز کرده. فقط در چند روز گذشته، چندین نفر از اطرافیان من هدف کلاهبرداری قرار گرفتن و بعضی‌هاشون متحمل خسارت سنگین شدن. پیامک هشدار پلیس فتا امروز، وسط همین پیگیری‌ها رسید. هشدار لازمه، اما کافی نیست. باید یه سازوکار یکپارچه و سریع برای اتصال سرنخ‌های بانک‌ها، اپراتوره…

👍41❤4

11 Oct 2026, 19:06 UTC≈9,330 views104 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

روحت شاد آقای چاپلین. باورم نمیشه که عصر جدید داره برامون تکرار میشه! انگار خط تولید «عصر جدید» از کارخونه اومده توی سیستمهامون. متنی که نوشتم از حس شخصی خودم و تجربه چند نفر دیگه در داخل و خارج از کشوره. شاید کمی اغراق‌آمیز به نظر بیاد ولی فکر نمیکنم خیلی هم دور از ذهن باشه رخ دادنش.. چندتا ترد باز، چندتا ایجنت مشغول کار و یه آدمی که باید مدام بینشون بچرخه، خروجی بخونه، خطا بگیره، تصمیم بگیره و مدام این چرخه رو تک…

👏53❤25👍24🎉2

9 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC≈8,230 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026

با یه پارادوکسی مواجه هستیم که خیلی مهمه درست درکش کنیم. وقتی در مورد کارایی که با ایجنت‌ها می‌کنم پست می‌ذارم، یه سوال رایج اینه که setup و فریمورک و trickهایی که به کار می‌بری چیه. معمولا جواب نمی‌دم چون سخته توضیح بدم که برای خیلی از کارها واقعا چیز خاصی ندارم... یا دوستان لطف دارن و می‌گن دوره و ورکشاپ برگزار کن. ولی به نظرم setup و trick اون چیزی نیست که فرق اصلی رو می‌سازه. چیزی که واقعا فرق می‌سازه یه چیز دیگ…

❤35👍18

4 Oct 2026, 07:43 UTC≈7,150 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026

از دیروز چند آیتم ظاهری در GoCasts به‌روز شده 🚀 اگه دقت کرده باشید، لوگو، اسم کانال و بیو تغییر کرده: Go Casts | Systems & Agents این تصمیم یهویی نبود. حدود یک سال و نیم پیش که @aicasts_ir رو راه انداختیم، نگاهمون این بود که همه‌مون، به‌عنوان مهندس نرم‌افزار، باید به این سمت بریم. ولی کم‌کم این موضوع برای خود GoCasts هم خیلی جدی‌تر شد. خیلی وقته که محتوای کانال رنگ و بوی agentها رو گرفته و طبیعی هم هست. ولی وقتش شد…

❤51👍9

1 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC≈7,420 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026

اینم از عمو باب که تسلیم شد! کاری ندارم که با ایشون هم نظر بودید و هستید یا نه. به دور از همه جنبه های فنی و اقتصادی ای که uncle bob داره من یه چیزی رو در ایشون خیلی بارز میدونم. تجربه نزدیک به ۶۰ سال برنامه نویسی! احتمالا هر چقدر جلوتر بریم کمتر درگیر کد خواهیم شد. نمیگم صفر میشه ولی خیلی خیلی کمتر از قبل خواهد شد. چون بیزینس‌ها انتظارشون متفاوت میشه و اعتمادشون هر روز به ایجنت‌ها بیشتر میشه. پس چه بخوایم چه نخوایم…

❤35👍3🔥3

1 Oct 2026, 06:56 UTC≈7,000 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @aicasts_irPhoto

ترکیب Sonnet 5.5 و Opus 5.5 این روزا خیلی خوب جواب میده. الگویی که برای من جواب داده اینه: کارای حجیم و تکراری (پیاده‌سازی، ریفکتور، نوشتن تست، پر کردن جزئیات) رو میدم به Sonnet 5.5. تصمیم‌های مهم رو میدم به Opus 5.5: طراحی، review، و جاهایی که اشتباه گرون تموم میشه. هزینه و سرعت متعادل میمونه و رو بخش‌های حساس هم کیفیت نمیاد پایین. چیزی که تازه حس کردم اینه که طول تسک‌های long-running از چند ساعت رسیده به چند روز.…

❤20👍18

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @gocasts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Quera
@quera_ir · 26,338
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
Job Finding | Search for your job
@jobs_finding · 20,477
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 September 2026
DevTwitter | توییت برنامه نویسی
@devtwitter · 33,489
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
Dr Ahmadian
@drmjahmadian · 90,427
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
جادی | Jadi
@jadivarlog · 105,673
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Programming Resources
@pythony · 19,711
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
عاشقانه ها
@Asheghaneha11 · 26,055
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 September 2026
Linuxor ?
@Linuxor · 34,338
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 September 2026
💎 دوره ی آفلاین فرندزنکته 💎
@Friends_course · 24,596
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 September 2026
ویکی تجربه - استخدام و بررسی شرکت ها
@wiki_tajrobe · 79,511
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Job Offer‌ With me 🎉💪
@get_joboffer · 19,229
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
Programmer Jokes
@programmerjokes · 106,012
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Geek Alerts
@geekalerts · 18,647
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 October 2026
هلی‌تاک
@hellitalk · 20,144
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
KhashayarTalks
@khashayartalks · 82,100
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Milad Nouri(ツ) میلاد نوری
@miladnourichannel · 27,162
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
Programming & AI Tips 💡
@ProgrammingTip · 45,887
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Kooshiar
@kooshiar3 · 25,589
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
برنامه نویسی | Programming
@Azad_Developers · 37,403
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Top Learn | تاپ لرن
@top_learn · 19,297
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
کنکور ارشد کامپیوتر
@Konkurcomputer · 49,737
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Bplus
@podcastbplus · 97,442
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
مکتب‌خونه | Maktabkhooneh
@maktabkhooneh · 35,523
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
ApplyKite
@ApplyIR2UK · 38,939
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Go Casts | Systems & Agents 🚀” (@gocasts), 10,565 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gocasts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.