Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,645–2,739 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:40
2,728
+5
14 Sept 2026, 21:01
2,723
+1
11 Sept 2026, 05:40
2,722
+29
6 Sept 2026, 01:18
2,693
-3
1 Sept 2026, 13:57
2,696
+3
29 Aug 2026, 19:54
2,693
-5
27 Aug 2026, 00:14
2,698
+6
23 Aug 2026, 14:07
2,692
+8
19 Aug 2026, 19:13
2,684
-3
16 Aug 2026, 20:36
2,687
+4
13 Aug 2026, 17:58
2,683
+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
2,682
+26
7 Aug 2026, 09:52
2,656
-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:45
2,658
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:34
2,658
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 21s
Average length
2m 21s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
320 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
91
28.4%
❤
78
24.4%
🤣
46
14.4%
💔
42
13.1%
👌
20
6.25%
👏
13
4.06%
👎
12
3.75%
💩
6
1.88%
⚡
5
1.56%
😡
2
0.625%
🤔
2
0.625%
🖕
1
0.313%
😎
1
0.313%
😨
1
0.313%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"رابطهٔ جیب شما با دمپایی پشمالو"
(در باب سازوکار بازار آزاد)
شما با پولتون چی میخرید؟ فرض کنیم ماهی صد میلیون ثابت درآمد دارید. مستأجرید. تنها زندگی میکنید.
با پولتون چیکار میکنید. مثل همهٔ مردم، به خزانه غیب یا حساب بانکی پدر (یا شوگرددی/مامی) وصل نیستید و باید پولتون رو مدیریت کنید.
شما فهرستی از نیازها دارید که به دقت ترجیحبندی شده. بعیده با صد میلیون سه روز برید استانبول و ۲۷ روز باقیمونده نون خشک بخور…
اگر بیتکوینتون رو با کلدکارد نگهداری میکنید: یک حفرهی امنیتی درش پیدا شده به صورتی که سید فریزش امن نبوده و بعضیا پولشون داره سرقت میشه. حتما کوینها رو به جای دیگه منتقل کنید.
https://x.com/coldcardwallet/status/2082961993070247948?s=46
شما چه جرئتی دارید ۵-۶ میلیارد پول رو داخل یه اپلیکیشن [طلای آنلاین] نگه میدارید!
۴ تا بانک بزرگ مملکت هک شد کسی گردن نگرفت
🔗 عرض کنم خدمتتون که : (@arzkonam)
〽️ @irancoin
در شرایط اقتصادی دشوار ایران و افت ارزش ریال، بسیاری به بیتکوین بهعنوان پناهگاه سرمایه روی آوردهاند. با کاهش اخیر قیمت بیتکوین، تصمیمگیری برای سرمایهگذاران سختتر شده است. محمد ماشینچیان اصول اولیه سرمایهگذاری در داراییهای پرنوسان را توضیح میدهد.
@iranintltv
دوستان مشکل کانال اختصاصی بات @lnp2pbot با کمک و راهنمایی توسعهدهندگان بات حل شد. الان میتونید در بات با دستور زیر، کامیونیتی سیمرغ رو دوباره بهصورت پیشفرض برای سفارشات خرید و فروش بر حسب تومان (و دلار) تعیین کنید
/findcomms irt
انتخاب کامیونیتی simorghp2p
انتخاب بهعنوان پیشفرض
حالا سفارشهای خرید و فروشتون بهجای کانال جهانی بهطور پیشفرض در کانال اختصاصی کامیونیتی فارسی
@simorgh_orders
منتشر میشه. همچنین م…
مشکل بات حل شد. فعلن با دستور
/setcomm off
در بات @lnp2pbot ، کامیونیتی پیشفرضتون رو خاموش کنید تا سفارشها بهجای کانال سفارشهای سیمرغ در کانال جهانی بات منتشر بشه تا توسعهدهندگان سر فرصت مشکل کانال اختصاصی سیمرغ رو بررسی و حل کنند.
برای اینکه سفارشهاتون از سوی جامعهی فارسی دیده بشه هم میتونید پس از انتشار در کانال جهانی، اون رو اینجا فوروارد کنید.
‼️ خطر کلاهبرداری و از دست دادن دارایی به عنوان فریز شدن تتر⚠️
یک نکتهی خیلی ⚠️:
داستان فریز شدنِ تتر در سطح کد و سازمان تتر اتفاق میوفته و به آدرس تتر، دارایی و تراکنشهای اون با آدرسهای شناخته شده مانند صرافیها مربوطه.
📣📣📣:
اینکه تترِ شما در چه کیفپولی (تراست والت، سیفپل، لدجر و ...) باشه اصلا اهمیتی نداره.
اگه تتر در امنترین کیفپول سختافزاری باشه و فلگ بشه، میتونن فریزش کنن!!
این وسط هرکسی میگه فلان ن…
🔷 فراخوانِ همکاری برایِ راهاندازیِ سامانهی هوشمندِ «پارسیانجمن»
🔻«پارسیانجمن» بر آن است تا سامانهای هوشمند برایِ بازآفرینیِ نوشتههای فارسیِ روزانه به نوشتاری روان، روشن، زنده، بی نادرستیِ نگارشی و شکستگی، و پالوده از آمیختگیِ نابهجای با واژههای بیگانه راهاندازی کند.
🔻کاربران این سامانهی هوشمندِ پارسیانجمن نوشتهها (از یک واژه تا نوشتهای بلند) را به سامانه میسپارند و سامانه آن را به پارسیِ روان و خوشخو…
الان که بحث تحریم صرافی ایرانی داغه، شاید وقتش شده باشه که روشهای نایکجاتر و دارای حریمخصوصی بهتر خرید بیتکوین رو یاد بگیرید و بهجای پرداخت کارمزدهای پیاپی برای برداشت و چرخاندن بیتکوینتون میان سکوهای گوناگون برای گمکردن رد صرافی ایرانی، یکراست و بینیاز از اعتماد، از خود فروشنده بیتکوین بخرید و روی لایتنینگ با بیشترین حریمخصوصی در کیفپولتون دریافتش کنید.
گویبان اینجا یه آموزش ساده و کاربردی از بات خرید همتا…
رئیس بانک مرکزی ج ا گفته «کنترل شتاب تورم» اولویت اصلی بانک مرکزی است.
نکتهی ریاضی:
«تورم» (در ادبیات بانکداری مرکزی) یعنی افزایش قیمتها
«افزایش تورم» یعنی رشد نرخ افزایش قیمتها
«افزایش سرعت تورم» یعنی سرعتگرفتن نرخ رشد افزایش قیمتها
«افزایش شتاب تورم» یعنی رشد نرخ سرعتگیری نرخ رشد افزایش قیمتها
حالا ایشون سهتای نخست از دستش دررفته، میخواد چهارمی رو کنترل کنه.
خلاصه که جای نگرانی نیست. ناصر نوسان حوا…
🤣14👍3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bitcoinarticlesfarsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@bitcoinarticlesfarsi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@arzkonam named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bplus @podcastbplus · 97,325 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
RadioDeev @radiodeev · 55,851 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
DJ Taba @DJTabaOfficial · 35,990 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 2 September 2026
GROWTH @growth_officiall · 22,676 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
نوید نقش آموزش رایگان انگلیسی @ielts9_course · 25,363 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
رواق / Ravaq @ravaq_pod · 29,514 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 9 September 2026
Anarconomy @anarconomy · 46,502 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
مطالعات اقتصادى بامداد @bamdad_institute · 23,563 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
KhashayarTalks @khashayartalks · 79,456 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ترجمهی مقالههای بیتکوین” (@bitcoinarticlesfarsi), 2,728 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitcoinarticlesfarsi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.