Channel
@Linuxor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
29,383subscribers
+538 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001483362835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Linuxor |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Linuxor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 29,383 | +67 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 29,316 | +125 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 29,191 | +220 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 28,971 | +20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 28,951 | +41 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 28,910 | +52 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 28,858 | +13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 28,845 | first reading |
137 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 137 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 137 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 792,480 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Linuxor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 137 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
کلی اصطلاح و چیزهای رایج توی بیزنس ها و استارتاپ ها هست که باید بدونید اینجا همشو جمع کرده البته چون ریپو تازه ساخته شده فعلا فقط تایتل اسماش هست ولی همینم خوبه چون مجبور میشید برید دربارش سرچ کنید github.com/SixArm/startup-business-guide @Linuxor
سناتور برنی سندرز که از قیافش معلومه ترسیده، گفته توسعه هوش مصنوعی رو متوقف کنید سناتو برنی از شرکتهای بزرگ هوش مصنوعی مثل OpenAI، Anthropic و Meta Platforms خواسته توسعه مدلهای پیشرفته هوش مصنوعی رو موقتاً متوقف کنن. دلیل این درخواست، نگرانی درباره رشد سریع AI و احتمال خارج شدن سیستمهای قدرتمند از کنترل انسان هستش. سندرز به گزارشهایی اشاره کرده که در اونها بعضی سیستمهای هوش مصنوعی در آزمایشها رفتارهای غیرمنت…
کسی که میخواد بفهمه بلاک چین چطوری کار میکنه اول باید بفهمه بیتکوین چطوری کار میکنه این کتابه که رایگان هم هست خیلی بهتون توی فهم بلاکچین کمک میکنه : github.com/bitcoinbook/bitcoinbook دقت کنید چیزی رو دانلود نکنید یه فایل هستش BOOK.md روش کلیک کنید باید توی مرورگر باز بشه چون فایل ها به صورت AsciiDoc هستن و دانلودش کنید دردسره باز کردنش. @Linuxor
🔥 آفر ویژه اکمارس برای ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی ChatGPT Plus — ۱,۴۴۰,۰۰۰ تومان Gemini Pro — ۴۵۰,۰۰۰ تومان Cursor Pro — ۳,۴۰۰,۰۰۰ تومان Claude Pro — ۴,۲۹۰,۰۰۰ تومان لینک خرید اکانت های هوش مصنوعی اکمارس ⚡️ فعالسازی سریع | 🛡 گارانتی و پشتیبانی @Accmars https://t.me/Accmars_support 🌐 www.accmars.com
این ایده طراحی چاپ رسید وقتی مشتری پرداختی انجام داد خیلی قشنگه و توی فضای مجازی سرو صدا کرده. دقت کنید ایده طراحیه فعلا کدش دردسترس نیست. @Linuxor
یه عامل هوش مصنوعی به اسم OpenClaw که قرار بود فقط برای رزرو کلاس باشگاه کمک کنه، وقتی کلاس پر بود، بهجای اینکه فقط از روشهای معمول استفاده کنه، رفت سراغ سیستم رزرو و یه ضعف امنیتی توی API پیدا کرد. بعد با دور زدن محدودیتها: زودتر از زمان مجاز ثبتنام کرد.جای کاربر رو توی لیست انتظار جلو انداخت. حتی رزرو یه نفر دیگه رو حذف کرد تا کاربر خودش بتونه وارد کلاس بشه😂 بعد از اینکه ازش خواستن تغییرات رو برگردونه، نتونس…
کسایی که توی ایران ویندوز دارن تقریبا همهچیشون کرکیه، ولی کرک خیلی وقتا سیستم رو ناامن میکنه و سیستمی که توش پر از اطلاعات شخصیه اصلا کرک گزینه خوبی نیست، اینجا لیستی از ابزار های اوپن سورس و رایگان ویندوز جمع آوری شده درسته کم وکاست داره ولی میتونه جایگزین خیلی از برنامه های پولی و کرکی باشه: github.com/0pandadev/awesome-windows دیگه حداقل بخاطر دانلود یه ویدیو ریکوردر نمیرید کرک نصب کنید هر چند خیلی از برنام…
✨ اکانت ChatGPT Plus پیشساخته یک ماهه، کاملاً اختصاصی🔐 ✅ ۲ هفته گارانتی بیقید و شرط ✅مدل Codex 5.6 Sol ✅ قابلیت اجرا در VS Code و Cursor ✅ به همراه Codex Windows ❗️ موجودی بسیار محدود ⚠️ این آفر فقط برای کاربرانی که در Linuxor عضو هستند فعال است! 💥 فقط ۱.۵۰۰.۰۰۰ تومان ⚡️ برای خرید کلیک کنید
افکت مایه ژله ای خیلی جالبه (لطفا خزش نکنید چون خودمم میخوام ازش توی سایتم استفاده کنم) تست آنلاین و دانلود: gooey.jakubantalik.com @Linuxor
گزارش جدید کراداستریک (همون شرکتی که پارسال به چوخ رفت و کل شرکتا ویندوزشون بلو اسکرین شد) گفته که 88 درصد از آسیبپذیریهای شناختهشده عمومی در عرض 48 ساعت مورد سوءاستفاده قرار میگیرن و گروههای هکری مرتبط با چین، این کار رو تنها توی 24 ساعت انجام میدهن. حملات سایبری به دلیل استفاده از هوش مصنوعی، اتوماسیون و تاکتیکهای تهاجمی سریعتر شدن که این اتفاق زمان واکنش شرکتها به تهدیدات رو به شدت کاهش داده و خیلی خطرناک…
اگه مک خریدین و هر برنامه ای خواستین نصب کنین دیدید پولیه بیاین اینجا یه لیست بزرگ از جایگزین های اوپن سورس و رایگان جمع آوری شده لیست خوبیه همیشه آپدیت میشه: github.com/jaywcjlove/awesome-mac @Linuxor
⏰ تسکهات یادت میره؟ بسپرشون به MuteOPS -ثبت و مدیریت تسکها -ریمایندر دقیق برای هر تسک -سریع و ساده، مستقیم داخل تلگرام -مناسب کار، مطالعه، ورزش، جلسات و TODOهای برنامهنویسی یادت نره، فقط انجامش بده 🤖 ورود به ربات: @muteopsbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 137 posts we hold for @Linuxor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
گوگل چرا معروف شد؟ بزرگ ترین مزیت رقابتیش نسبت به بقیه رقبا چه بود؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 137 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 13,027 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Linuxor ?” (@Linuxor), 29,383 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Linuxor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.