Channel
@Dataphil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,797subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001563318869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dataphil |
| Description | در این کانال مطالبی که دوست دارم رو قرار میدم و موضوع خاصی نداره. هر مطلبی دلم بخواد میذارم https://twitter.com/vahidbaghi95 https://vahidbaghi.ir/blog @VahidBaghi |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dataphil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 2,797 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 2,797 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 2,796 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 2,799 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 2,802 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 2,807 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 2,811 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 2,810 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2,814 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 2,815 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,819 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 38,855 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dataphil. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
این توییت رو دیدم : https://x.com/Lasttradereth/status/2095387475812167873 بعد آدرس ولتم رو زدم تو اینجا : https://usdtbanlist.com/usdt-wallet-checker دیدم جزو بلکلیسته. نکته اینه که من USDT BSC دارم و خرج هم میکنم. در نتیجه تا اینجای کار USDT BSC اوکی بوده. چون یه دفعه پرسیدم کجا نگهدارم که فریز نشه. برای همین گفتم این آپدیت رو هم بدم
اگر کسی تو مکالمه تو یک پیام در جواب شما گفت alright قطعا پاکستانیه. بدون شک.
این مدل Fable 5.1 رو من صرفا سشن رو باز کردم ۵ درصد ظرفیت ۵ ساعتهم رفت :)
نمیدونم بعد iphone se 2022 دیگه چی بگیرم. گوشی اندرویدی که دوست ندارم. گوشی بزرگ از ۵ اینچ هم دوست ندارم. منم آدمی نیستم که پول زیاد برای «تلفن همراه» بدم. حالا تا ۲۰۲۹ فکر کنم براش آپدیت میاد ولی بعدش دیگه ایدهای ندارم.
برای اولین بار به claude پول دادم (کردیت کارت براش شارژ کردم) برای یه تسکی گفتم برو هر چی لازمه بخر. فلان قدر بودجه داری. الان خودش کیف پول اون سایتی که بهش دادم رو شارژ کرده داره چیز هایی که لازمه رو میخره و دیتا جمع میکنه.
هر دفعه یه بگایی جدید پیش میاد. اون دفعه DNS های توی سرور رفت هوا و هیچی روی سرور کار نمیکرد. الان یه cron نوشتم چندین DNS مختلف (شکن، هاستایران، زیرساخت، گوگل، کلادفلر) رو چک میکنه که اگر هر کدوم resolve نشه سوییچ کنه سریع و netplan رو آپدیت کنه.
یکی اومده تست نفوذ انجام بده و سیستم تشخیص داده و اندخته توی هانی پات. بعد طرف اومده میگه من نمیدونم چرا مسدود شدم. خودش رو زده به کسخلی. حداقل پروفایل هکریت رو بردار :)
من مدت هاست شمارهای که ذخیره ندارم رو جواب نمیدم. مگر اینکه منتظر تماس باشم (مثلا پیک و …) یه بار یکی بهم زنگ زده بود جواب ندادم. بعد زنگ زدم پیگیری کنم که چی بوده که اونم جواب نداد. بعد از چند ساعت دوباره تماس گرفت. یه مرده بود. گفت با دختر من چیکار داشتی؟ داستان رو گفتم. گفت حالا معلوم میشه! دیشب یه نفر دوباره زنگ زد. جواب ندادم. توی این برنامه Number box سرچ کردم دیدم خانمه. بلاکش کردم که مجدد هم زنگ نزنه :)
هاستایران H200 آورده ساعتی ۶۰۰ هزار تومن. ماهی حدود ۴۳۰ تومن. من فکر میکنم هنوز قیمت API از host کردن لوکال مدل ارزونتر در میاد. البته کیس به کیس فرق داره ولی فقط زمانی ارزش داره که قیمت host کردن لوکال حداقل ۳۰ درصد ارزون تر از API در بیاد. چون این نگهداری کردن سرورش خودش هزینه داره. از دید کسب و کاری میگم ها. host شخصی رو کاری ندارم. بخوای به چند هزار تا کاربر سرویس بدی طبیعتا به همچین سروری نیاز داری
بعد از این قضایای فریز شدن تتر، چه راه امنی برای نگهداری تتر هست؟ من الان USDT روی شبکه BSC دارم.
بعدش که پول رو پس دادیم میدونید چی گفته؟ این اپ مسیریاب تخمیتون رو هم حذف کردم. مرسی
حالا الان مشکل skill issue بوده یا نه؟ من UI/UX رو باید چیکار میکردم که این کاربر اینطوری نشه؟ اینکه میگم همه نقطه به نقطه داستان همارزی داره برای اینه که کاربر بلد بوده رانندگی کنه. بلد بوده مسیری که مسیریاب میده رو دنبال کنه. میتونسته تابلو ها رو بخونه. اما چنین کاری کرده. ببینید شوخی نمیکنم ها. طرف ایستگاه ما رو نگرفته بوده ها. جدی بوده قضیه. کار به شکایت داشته میرسیده. بعد ما چیکار کردیم؟ پول بنزینش رو پس دادیم …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dataphil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dataphile” (@Dataphil), 2,797 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dataphil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.