Posted without readable text

Channel
Макеты Figma
@templateFigma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,630subscribers
-399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001545966662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @templateFigma |
| Created | 31 August 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/templateFigma |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 10,630 | -28 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 08:40 | 10,658 | -30 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 10,688 | -67 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:59 | 10,755 | -19 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 10,774 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 10,789 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 10,793 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 10,809 | -21 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 10,830 | -14 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 10,844 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:43 | 10,853 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 10,868 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 10,876 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 10,881 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 10,886 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 10,889 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 10,897 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 10,912 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 10,922 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 10,930 | first reading |
Engagement
120 posts held, back to 31 August 2021 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 120 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2021 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Почему ИИ слабо видит проблемы юзабилити Исследование использования ИИ-агентов для сбора и анализа интерфейсов. Какую пользу может принести автоматизация тестирования интерфейсов с помощью искусственного интеллекта? Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Posted without readable text
Правки включены — пиши пропало Как избежать лишних споров с клиентом? Подробнее о включенных правках в дизайне. Экономьте время и нервы сразу Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Posted without readable text
Магазин карточек в мобильном приложении Как магазин карточек на Ozon Seller превратился в мобильное приложение? Узнайте об адаптации веб-флоу, уникальных интерфейсах и решениях для удобства продавцов в B2B-сделках Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Posted without readable text
Студийная × дизайнерс Август уже перевалил за экватор, а значит, пора проверить, все ли ваши публикации добрались до конкурса. Если с 1 по 30 августа у вас на дизайнерс вышли кейсы, статьи, туториалы, исследования, чек-листы или другие материалы — отправляйте ссылки в @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot. В конце месяца раздадим: 🎙 3 бизнес-подписки на дизайнерс на полгода + 3 посева по большой сетке каналов — за максимальное к…
Любимчики нашей арт-директорки Основные имена в мире дизайна и увлекательные эксперименты – всё это ждет тебя в подборке Рэнт Благой для Британской Высшей Школы Дизайна Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Posted without readable text
И рыбку съесть и рекламную кампанию запустить. Работа над рекламной кампанией для новинки бренда тунца FORTUNA: подробности внутри Читать на дизайнерс | #кейс
Новость, которую вы точно не ждали Сейчас отовсюду кричат про AI, про необходимость дизайнеру проникаться этими технологиями. Кричат не зря, наверное это уже база, чтобы быть конкурентноспособными (да че говорить, если я сам помогаю делать дизайн раздела образования через клод). Уже начали появляться курсы и интенсивы, которые дают неплохой старт, для того что бы дизайнер встал на новые ai-рельсы. Пару месяцев наза…
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @templateFigma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@true_figma · 25,959
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@figma_maketss · 35,072
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@figma2html · 45,072
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@figma60sec · 25,084
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@sitodel · 25,614
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@figmaweb · 40,405
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Макеты Figma” (@templateFigma), 10,630 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/templateFigma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.