Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اخبار تلگرام - فارسی

@tg_ir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

14,648subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001003054104
TypeChannel
Username@tg_ir
Descriptionهم‌اکنون پنج‌شنبه ۲۲ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ ساعت ۵:۱۸ هر تون 💎 ۲۵۲,۸۱۲ تومان (۱.۳۵ دلار) سرویس‌های ما (ربات‌ها، تبلیغات، واسط امن) 👈 1ij.xyz/sv
Created5 December 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tg_ir

Growth

14,64414,67914,661.55 August 2026 — 14,679 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,679 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,660 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,655 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,644 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,648 subscribers14,6485 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,639–14,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:5814,648+4
11 Aug 2026, 19:4314,644-11
9 Aug 2026, 20:5314,655-5
8 Aug 2026, 20:5914,660-7
7 Aug 2026, 22:0714,667-10
6 Aug 2026, 22:2214,677-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:2114,679no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:3714,679first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.1%
avg views ÷ 14,648 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,140
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.954%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total35,950
Reactions total343
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
796
Videos
77
Links
985

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,071 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥40037.3%
29027.1%
👍17216.1%
🤣444.11%
❤‍🔥383.55%
💩252.33%
👏232.15%
👎201.87%
🤨121.12%
🥱121.12%
🤯80.747%
🎉50.467%
😱50.467%
🍌30.28%
💯30.28%
🍓20.187%
💋20.187%
💔20.187%
😍20.187%
🐳10.093%
2 further kinds20.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,071reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tg_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC≈2,380 views74 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

طبق نسخه‌های آزمایشی، در به‌روز رسانی بعدی تلگرام، قابلیت‌های زیر اضافه خواهد شد: — کیف پول داخلی غیرحضانتی TON (Gram) در تلگرام — پشتیبانی از دکمه و فایل در پیام‌های غنی (Rich Messages) — پیام‌های خوش‌آمدگویی می‌توانید پیام‌های خوش‌آمدگویی موقتی را به گروه‌های خود اضافه کنید که فقط برای کاربر هنگام پیوستن به گروه نمایش داده می‌شوند — طراحی جدید برای اعلان «پیام پشتیبانی‌نشده» که دکمه «آپدیت» را نشان می‌دهد — ام

🔥50👍13🥱6👏4💩1

30 Jul 2026, 04:30 UTC≈4,700 views54 reactionsread 13 August 2026

بنظر می‌رسد که اعلام جرم اخیر روسیه علیه دوروف، ریسک سرمایه‌گذاری بلندمدت روی ارز تلگرام را افزایش داده است.

👍28👎108🤣7👌1

15 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC≈7,440 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026

قابلیت جدید کامیونیتی (جامعه/اجتماع/انجمن) درباره این قابلیت یک توضیح صوتی در پاسخ کامنت‌ها داده بودم، که علاوه بر آن تصحیح و اضافه می‌کنم: ✅ فقط مالک گروه/کانال می‌تواند آن را به یک انجمن اضافه کند ✅ فقط کانال/گروه با کمتر از ۱۰ هزار عضو می‌تواند به کامیونیتی اضافه شود ✅ هر کامیونیتی می‌تواند ۱۰۰ گفتگو (کانال یا گروه) داشته باشد و ۱۰۰ ربات

31👍14💩5👏1

14 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC≈6,700 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026

معرفی رسمی قابلیت‌های جدید تلگرام: https://telegram.org/blog/communities-editor-invisible-messages/fa

🔥3012🎉5👎1💩1

14 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈5,950 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026

دلیل‌ش مشخص شد: https://telegram.me/webamoozir/20013 هرچند خبرهایی از برگشت دامنه t.me به حالت عادی گزارش می‌شود...

🤣206🤯3👎2💩2

14 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC≈4,850 views43 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

برای برنامه‌نویسان؛ باز هم بروزرسانی زیرساخت ربات‌ها در این بروزرسانی چند قابلیت مهم اضافه شده است که یکی از آنها قابلیت ارسال پیام از نوع ephemeral در گروه است؛ پیام‌هایی که فقط یک شخص مشخص آن را می‌بیند. این قابلیت کاربردهایی دارد مثل پیام خوش‌آمدگویی به کاربر در گروه بدون مزاحمت برای سایر اعضای گروه. همچنین برای ارسال پیام rich text علاوه بر markdown امکان استفاده از html نیز فراهم شده است. جزئیات کامل این بروز

👍336🔥2👏1🤣1

14 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC≈3,930 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @nooshdaroo_webPhoto

💡 دامنه‌ی کوتاه t.me تلگرام از دسترس خارج شد؛ از کار افتادن لینک‌ها در سراسر جهان اگر امروز روی لینک یک کانال یا گروه تلگرامی کلیک کرده‌اید و مرورگرتان خطا داده است، تنها نیستید؛ مشکل به یک اختلال فنی در آدرس‌دهی جهانی تلگرام برمی‌گردد. دامنه معروف t‌.‌me تلگرام که از آن برای کوتاه کردن لینک‌ها (مثل لینک دعوت به گروه‌ها، لینک کانال‌ها و آدرس ربات‌ها) استفاده می‌شود، در سطح جهانی معلق شده و شرکت ثبت‌کننده این دامنه،

21👍10🤣4💔2💩2

13 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC≈6,220 views105 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

انقلاب تلگرام برای زیرساخت ربات‌ها: دیگر برای اجرای ربات‌ها، نیاز نیست سرور بخرید! با این امکان، برنامه‌نویسان می‌توانند کد ربات خود با زبان js و با دیتابیس sqlite را روی سرور خود تلگرام قرار دهند. فعلا تلگرام محدودیتی برای این امکان قرار نداده و آن را رایگان اعلام کرده است! جزئیات بیشتر: core.telegram.org/bots/serverless پی‌نوشت: مشخص شد که این قابلیت آزمایشی است و فعلا هنوز برای همه فعال نشده است و تنها به مشارک

70🔥17👍10❤‍🔥4👏4

14 Jun 2026, 10:18 UTC≈9,190 views64 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

برای مشاهده قابلیت‌های انقلاب جدید پیام تلگرامی، می‌توانید پس از بروزرسانی تلگرام خود، خروجی‌های این ربات را ببینید: @RichTextDemoBot

🔥479🥱5😍2🐳1

14 Jun 2026, 02:24 UTC≈8,640 views79 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

همانطور که در مطلب قبل نوشتیم، ایجاد پیام متنی غنی‌شده (Riched text) که لابلای آن حاوی جدول، فرمول ریاضی، مدیا و... باشد، در بروزرسانی انقلابی اخیر تلگرام اضافه شده است هرچند فعلا این نوع محتواها «فقط توسط ربات» می‌تواند تولید شود. اما همانطور که می‌بینید، مدیر تلگرام در پاسخ توییتی گفته که در نظر دارند در آینده این امکان را برای کاربران نیز فراهم می‌شود تا بتوانند چنین محتوایی ایجاد کنند.

🔥5513👍6😱4🥱1

11 Jun 2026, 19:25 UTC≈8,180 views82 reactionsread 13 August 2026

امشب تلگرام یک آپدیت انقلابی منتشر کرد که در لینک زیر می‌توانید جزئیات آن را بخوانید: telegram.org/blog/watch-apps-and-more/fa مهمترین تغییر در این به‌روزرسانی که در راستای هماهنگی بیشتر با خروجی‌های استاندارد هوش‌مصنوعی انجام شده این است که ربات‌ها می‌توانند متن ساختار یافته (MarkDown) منتشر کنند که این متن‌ها علاوه بر موارد قبلی مثل بولد، ایتالیک و هایپرلینک، از این به بعد متن ارسالی ربات‌ها می‌تواند حاوی مدیا، جدو

🔥55👏12🤨7💩5❤‍🔥3

2 Jun 2026, 05:05 UTC≈8,210 views63 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

پاول دورف، مدیرعامل تلگرام، اعلام کرده که رمزارز Ton Coin در بلاکچین TON به اسم اصلی خودش یعنی Gram برمیگرده. رمزارز Gram اولین نام برای ارز بومی بلاکچین TON بود که در سال 2018 شروع به کار کرد و در سال 2019 عرضه عمومی شد. دورف از طریق این رمزارز بیش از 1.7 میلیارد دلار سرمایه جذب کرد ولی در سال 2020 کمیسیون بورس امریکا (SEC) عرضه این رمزارز و دریافت پول از سرمایه گذاران رو غیرقانونی خوند و بعد از جریمه تلگرام، اون ر

❤‍🔥31👍1512🔥4👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tg_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 197,487 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اخبار تلگرام - فارسی” (@tg_ir), 14,648 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.