Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Finvest Public | فینوست عمومی

Channel

Finvest Public | فینوست عمومی

@FinvestPublic

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,921subscribers

-1,720 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213541281
TypeChannel
Username@FinvestPublic
Description📊تحلیل‌های کاربردی | 🎙 ویس‌های تحلیلی | 🔴 لایو استریم 📢 این کانال عمومی است و مکمل کانال اصلی فینوست می‌باشد. مطالب ارائه‌شده در اینجا جهت آموزش و تحلیل کاربردی بازار است 🤖بات اختصاصی فینوست: @Finvestchannelbot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/FinvestPublic

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@FinvestPublic/1586 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC@namavar_economy/808630 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@FinvestPublic/1587 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC@namavar_economy/808730 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@FinvestPublic/1588 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC@namavar_economy/808830 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@FinvestPublic/1594 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC@namavar_economy/80942 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@FinvestPublic/1595 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC@namavar_economy/80952 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC1.00under a minute
@FinvestPublic/1596 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC@namavar_economy/80962 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@namavar_economy7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@namavar_economy (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @namavar_economy. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

23,92125,64124,7817 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net -1,720. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,663–25,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 07:3923,921-21
8 Nov 2026, 18:4523,942-21
7 Nov 2026, 14:1623,963-24
6 Nov 2026, 11:2623,987-14
5 Nov 2026, 13:1924,001-21
4 Nov 2026, 09:5924,022-12
3 Nov 2026, 06:2124,034-8
2 Nov 2026, 04:4824,042-15
1 Nov 2026, 02:4124,057-16
30 Oct 2026, 23:2924,073-22
29 Oct 2026, 23:3624,095-17
28 Oct 2026, 23:0724,112-16
28 Oct 2026, 00:3024,128-23
27 Oct 2026, 02:1624,151-20
26 Oct 2026, 02:0824,171-9
24 Oct 2026, 22:5824,180-22
24 Oct 2026, 02:2524,202-22
23 Oct 2026, 03:0724,224-12
22 Oct 2026, 01:0824,236-13
20 Oct 2026, 22:5624,249first reading

Engagement

424 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 130 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.31%
avg views ÷ 23,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.952%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 424 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held424 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total138,374
Reactions total1,317
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 21:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
339
Videos
50
Links
157

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

4,294 reactions across 407 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,36678.4%
👍45610.6%
😁2495.80%
🔥1724.01%
😱270.629%
🤯240.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 407 of the 424 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 424 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 109 posts held from the last 30 days (0.917%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC426 views11 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

📌شنبه ساعت ۲۱:۰۰ توی لایو میبینمتون

❤11

10 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC431 views9 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

‼️نرخ بهره وام بانکی ده درصد بالا رفته! طلا چی میشه؟! پله ها کجاست؟ تک سناریو بهت میگم

❤9

10 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC571 views10 reactionsread 10 November 2026

🚨 امشب توی لایو استریم، پله‌های خرید طلا و دلار رو با هم بررسی می‌کنیم. 🚨 حتماً حضور داشته باش! 👉🏻 https://t.me/namivest_ir 👈🏻

❤10

10 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC583 views7 reactionsread 10 November 2026

☝🏻اما یه سؤال مهم: ⁉️الان طلا و دلار رو توی چه قیمت‌هایی بخریم و کجا بفروشیم؟

❤7

10 Nov 2026, 14:55 UTC580 views7 reactionsread 10 November 2026

❌ پس فقط اینکه چه طلایی بخری مهم نیست؛ اینکه چطور بخری هم می‌تونه نتیجه رو تغییر بده.✅

👍7

10 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC549 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026

توی 4 **ماه گذشته: 📈 طلای ۱۸ عیار: ۲۳٪ بازدهی اما 🏆 سبد طلای نامی‌وست: ۴۷٪ بازدهی!**

❤8

10 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC548 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026

📌 اینکه بخوای صرفاً تمام پول تو، درجا وارد بازار بکنی میتونه باعث بشه از خیلی از فرصت‌ها جا بمونی

❤5

10 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC558 views4 reactionsread 10 November 2026

🤔 چطور می‌شه از طلا، بیشتر از خود طلا سود گرفت؟

❤4

9 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC≈4,260 views9 reactionsread 10 November 2026

🚨لایو مهندس امیرحسین نام آور درگیری یا توافق؟! https://t.me/namivest_ir

❤9

9 Nov 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,060 views19 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

ویسی که بهتون قول داده بودم !!! جنگ منتفی شد ؟؟؟ گوش کن متوجه بشی اوضاع از چه قرار.👆

❤16🔥2👍1

9 Nov 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,090 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026

📌عزیزانم فقط یک مورد مهم رو بهتون بگم خیلیییییی بهش توجه کنید !!! هیچی رو استاپ نکنید به خاطر وضعیت ❌ ✅پایین زدنا فرصت خریده هاا…

❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 424 posts we hold for @FinvestPublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 6 posts on @FinvestPublic as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

هم تو این شرایط همین حس رو دارین؟ برای بازار و سرمایه‌تون نمی‌دونین باید چیکار کنین؟

  1. آره، واقعاً نمی‌دونیم چیکار کنیم.74%
  2. بالاخره باید یه تصمیمی بگیریم.33%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 424 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Namavar_economy
@namavar_economy · 38,879
#1
نقدکس | Naghdex
@naghdexx · 70,362
#2
محمد هلاکوئی
@cloobmali · 106,432
#3
Amir_ramzali
@amir_ramzali · 118,801
#4
امیر رمزعلی ( بازارهای مالی )
@ramzali_sc · 134,109
#5
Hoseini Finance
@hoseini · 422,785
#6
مجله‌ نوبیتکس
@Nobitexmag · 146,750
#7
Nobitex | نوبیتکس
@nobitexmarket · 315,154
#8
BITFA ™️‌| بیتفا
@bitfa · 232,653
#9
فرصت اینجاست
@cafetradeiran · 57,173
#10
سیگنال کریپتو و فارکس عمومی ققنوس ❤️‍🔥
@adam3 · 90,939
#11
آرش کهنگی/ ارزدیجیتال
@kahangi_arash1 · 84,159
#12
Otis
@otis_vip · 81,883
#13
امیرم‌بیت | درآمد دلاری
@amirambit · 174,583
#14
TV کافه ترید
@cafetradetv · 73,926
#15
MatinMental
@matinmentalofficial · 45,546
#16
Rastad | راستاد
@rastad · 357,543
#17
Crypto Coiner
@ccoineres · 20,808
#18
باشگاه کافه ترید
@bashgahcafetrade · 44,272
#19
ForexFa | فارکس‌ فارسی
@forexfa · 11,214
#20
نهنگ قرمز - سیگنال رایگان💰
@redmahale · 45,606
#21
Mrkia | ارز دیجیتال - ایردراپ - درآمد دلاری
@mrkia7 · 53,780
#22
کانال vip آرسا ترید
@arsacafetrade · 44,005
#23
اتاق معاملاتی VIP
@tradeviproom · 33,589
#24
Bitpull | مرجع تخصصی ارزدیجیتال
@bitpull · 32,057
#25
CarOnline Crypto
@caronline_crypto · 86,741
#26
مهدى رجبى - جريان کپیتال
@mahdirajabi_com · 11,798
#27
ارزپـُن |™️ARZPON
@arz_pon · 12,803
#28
💎Sobhan samadi | سبحان صمدى
@sobhanforex · 105,681
#29
Arkacoin - آرکاکوین
@future_arkacoin · 28,704
#30
Radin trade | رادین ترید
@radin_trade · 64,074
#31
Trade City Pro ™️
@tradecity_pro · 79,554
#32
Alireza Kaleji
@alirezakalejii · 154,211
#33
دوره روانشناسی امیرحسین نام آور
@FLA1I · 3,305
#34
لایوترید با آراد
@cryptobyarad · 53,343 (as read 15 September 2026)
#35
اکو کلاب پلاس
@iransaramayee · 50,501
#36
نوسانگیری از بیتکوین
@ABCD1234BTC · 15,991
#37
سیگنال و ترید | دستیار ارزکوچ
@arzcoachtrade · 26,700
#38
روانشناسی نام آور
@namavar_tec · 1,854
#39
کانال اطلاع‌رسانی حسینی فایننس
@hoseinifinance_course · 12,122
#40
ترید سهام آمریکا با علیرضا
@alirezacafetrade · 41,838
#41
Saeed Feyzian | سعید فیضیان
@saeedFeyzianFree · 339,054
#42
Mr Chartist سیگنال ارز دیجیتال
@MrChartist_public · 8,304
#43
کانال لایو ترید فارکس | SorooshFx
@SorooshFX · 3,959
#44
مهراد | جریان پول 10X
@MEHRADFIROUZIOFFICIAL · 49,175
#45
Javad Trade ⚠️
@javadtrade11 · 226,698
#46
ساتوشی BAD Whale
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 82,087
#47
دوره های رایگان روانشناسی پرایس تکنوفاند تکنیکال پیش بینیو ..ict.. نام آور
@arzdijitalraigan100 · 608 (as read 15 September 2026)
#48
EarnVest
@earnvest · 50,358 (as read 15 September 2026)
#49
ARZINEH
@Arzineh_Officials · 32,427
#50
🥇ترید با دارا🥇سیگنال فارکس و کریپتو
@coachinjaa · 1,896
#51
🥇تحلیل اقتصاد ایران و بین الملل🥇
@darasadhezari · 24,290
#52
Cryptofa | کریپتوفا
@Cryptofa_official · 44,652
#53
Tcstore
@tcstore_news · 6,635
#54
Soroosh School
@sorooshschools · 36,095
#55
BitBoy Crypto
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,091
#56
آموزش فارکس
@foren · 26,518
#57
اخبار آکادمی مالی جوانشیر
@javanshiracademyNews · 14,209
#58
کافه ترید news
@maryam_cafetrade · 38,164
#59
کریپتو شیروانی
@shirvanico · 47,669
#60
🎖رویال کلاب فارکس🎖
@royalclub_ir · 10,909
#61
اقتصاد ایران(دلار-بورس-طلا)
@econamdar · 49,063
#62
Alireza Mehrabi
@alirezamehrabi_com · 114,448
#63
Eco_ramzali
@ramzali_eco · 69,242
#64
جریانِ اقتصاد
@jaryane_eghtesad · 49,169
#65
محمد هلاکوئی- ذهن آرام
@halakoeivip · 108,077
#66
Arash analysis
@arash_timess · 426,785
#67
CAR ONLINE
@caronline · 433,837
#68
fatimagold | فاطیماگلد
@fatimacafetrade · 136,334
#69
Alireza.S
@cryptobyalireza · 36,662
#70
علیرضا محرابی | Alireza Mehrabi
@AlirezaMehrabi_ir · 290,661
#71
Ecoehsan | اکواحسان
@eco_ehsan · 1,123,774
#72
Solevrage
@solevrage11 · 53,442
#73
پویان روحی
@thepouyan · 79,499
#74
Daraei360 تحلیل اقتصاد
@doctordaraei · 34,229
#75
Lasttrader.eth
@ETHlasttrader · 41,825
#76
دکتر فرهاد شایگان👑
@farhad1356 · 70,496
#77
👑 KKING CRYPTO | سیگنال کریپتو 👑
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 102,800
#78
ArzDigital - ارزدیجیتال
@arzdigital · 106,919
#79
فارکس با رابین
@Tradewithrobin · 38,208
#80
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,423,087
#81
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,860,139
#82
Diamore | Announcements
@diamoremarket · 316,067
#83
Whale Alert
@whale_alert_io · 295,637
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Namavar_economy
@namavar_economy · 38,879
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
نقدکس | Naghdex
@naghdexx · 70,362
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Maedetech | برنامه نویسی | هوش مصنوعی
@maedetech · 35,541
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
بیدار شو !
@adwakeup · 43,386
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
اقتصاد ایران(دلار-بورس-طلا)
@econamdar · 49,063
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
میثم دهقانی | ‌ارتش طلا 👑
@meysamdehqani · 66,500
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
آموزش فارکس
@foren · 26,518
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Tradingprofessor
@tradingprofessorchannel · 72,746
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
امیر رمزعلی ( بازارهای مالی )
@ramzali_sc · 134,109
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Mirbanki | میربانکی
@mirbanki1 · 90,536
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Mehran invest!
@mehraninvest_official · 27,857
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
Eco_ramzali
@ramzali_eco · 69,242
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Finvest Public | فینوست عمومی” (@FinvestPublic), 23,921 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FinvestPublic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.