💬 Abbiamo creato questo canale quando è iniziata la FANTA-PANDEMIA
Il nostro obbiettivo adesso, è continuare a pubblicare notizie diversificando gli argomenti.
Siamo qui, non molliamo e instancabili tutti insieme, faremo scudo contro il "SISTEMA" 💪🏼
Created
15 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,982–27,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 16:24
26,989
-3
14 Aug 2026, 21:52
26,992
-9
13 Aug 2026, 15:35
27,001
+3
12 Aug 2026, 16:17
26,998
-8
11 Aug 2026, 12:45
27,006
-10
10 Aug 2026, 11:53
27,016
-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:16
27,018
-3
8 Aug 2026, 17:38
27,021
-9
7 Aug 2026, 14:24
27,030
-5
6 Aug 2026, 15:46
27,035
-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:31
27,037
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 26,989 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,910
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
50 (26 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
145,350
Reactions total
3,233
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈30,900
Videos
≈19,000
Links
≈44,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
33m 04s
Average length
1m 50s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,233 reactions across 50 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,019
31.5%
❤
494
15.3%
👏
342
10.6%
💯
299
9.25%
💩
247
7.64%
🔥
149
4.61%
🤬
137
4.24%
🤣
131
4.05%
😡
116
3.59%
🤡
97
3.00%
🤮
94
2.91%
🎉
35
1.08%
😴
28
0.866%
🤗
18
0.557%
😱
16
0.495%
🍾
6
0.186%
🙏
4
0.124%
😢
1
0.031%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,233reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚 Possiamo sembrare conservatori o persino antiprogressisti, ma riteniamo ancora valida una tesi: se un giorno non dovesse esserci più luce, il libro non si spegnerebbe. 💡
Perché il sapere non nasce dalla tecnologia, ma dal bisogno dell’uomo di conoscere, comprendere e continuare a esercitare la propria capacità di pensiero.
Ed è proprio questa capacità che dobbiamo difendere da ogni sistema di potere e da chi, pe…
💢 LA COMMISSIONE COVID E GLI UNTOUCHABLES
Mario Draghi notoriamente è uomo della Goldman Sachs dove ora lavora il figlio ovviamente perché è bravissimo.
La figlia viceversa lavora nel comparto di Big Pharma. Bravissima anche lei.
Il bancario Mario Draghi si laureò con il Prof. Federico Caffè discutendo una tesi di laurea sulla inattuabilità di una moneta unica nell’Unione europea (allora Comunità europea).
Questo s…
💉 "Le iniezioni anti-COVID sono state più pericolose del COVID."
🩺 Il dottor Charles Hoffe afferma che i danni da vaccino anti-COVID sono diventati le "vere vittime" dopo l'avvio della campagna vaccinale, sostenendo che le autorità non abbiano affrontato adeguatamente le segnalazioni di cittadini canadesi che riferiscono di aver subito danni.
🔺 Hanno seguito lo schema Draghi, con AIFA e Magrini che nascondevano i g…
🤦🏼♂️ Il livello di manipolazione mentale attuato dai Governi Conte e Draghi è ben peggio di quello del nazismo, che al confronto sembrano principianti.
🖊 LEONARDO GUERRA
👉 La Voce Libera
L'apocalisse dei miliardari: da Zuckerberg a Thiel, tutti i bunker per la fine del mondo
La nuova destinazione?
L'Argentina di Milei.
Ma c'è il rifugio sotterraneo alle Hawaii, gli ettari in Nuova Zelanda e la SoHo House dell'Apocalisse.
Per scappare da guerre nucleari, clima, pandemie, rivolte e AI fuori controllo
🔎 https://www.adnkronos.com/economia/lapocalisse-dei-miliardari-da-zuckerberg-a-thiel-tutti-i-bunk…
Lo sapevano... il Dipartimento della Difesa aveva ricevuto questa lista fin dall'inizio... monitoravano la comparsa di queste condizioni... e hanno ignorato i segnali di sicurezza perché "lo aveva detto Fauci"...
da LEONARDO GUERRA
👉 La Voce Libera
🔺 DOTT. JAMES THORP: "I dati grezzi hanno rivelato un tasso di aborto spontaneo dell'82% nelle donne vaccinate contro il COVID-19 durante il primo trimestre; questa cifra rispecchia l'effetto di farmaci abortivi chimici come la RU486".
🔺 DOTT. JAMES THORP:
Il Dott. James Thorp è un medico specializzato in ostetricia e ginecologia e in medicina materno-fetale, che assiste le proprie pazienti ostetriche da oltre 44 an…
Nel gennaio 2021, Fauci scrisse in un messaggio privato che la seconda dose del vaccino anti-COVID «teoricamente avrebbe potuto essere associata ad aborti spontanei nel primo trimestre» a causa della tempesta di citochine e della febbre.
Pochi giorni dopo dichiarò pubblicamente che non vi erano «segnali di allarme».
Lo sapevano. Eppure hanno continuato a promuoverlo.
da LEONARDO GUERRA
👉 La Voce Libera
🟢 Il Dr Martin va alla radice del problema, non rimane in superficie come i media continuano a fare da 6 anni.
Anche il caso Fauci, proposto come capro espiatorio, serve a controllare la narrazione per evitare di andare al nocciolo della questione.
Il Covid è stato un genocidio pianificato.
Perpetrato da una organizzazione sovra governativa che lo ha coordinato a livello globale, l’OMS.
Un vero racket
https://rum…
Va bene, abbiamo cancellato il video.
Ci siamo imbattuti ancora una volta nella solita polemica e, sinceramente, ci siamo stancati di dover spiegare sempre la stessa cosa.
Il problema non era il video in sé, né tantomeno chi lo ha realizzato.
Il problema era il fatto che quel contenuto fosse stato ripreso e fatto passare per vero da molte persone, compresi diversi canali, e che sotto quel video ci fossero commenti…
🔷 Come e perché abolire l’obbligo vaccinale pediatrico
💉 La maggior parte dei vaccini con alluminio e virali inoculati a forza nei nostri neonati e bambini inconsapevoli (dopo aver intortato i genitori instillando paure fasulle e tacendo i rischi) sono inutili e pericolosi sia per loro stessi che per la collettività.
Ci sono le PROVE.
🔎https://cmsindipendente.it/sites/default/files/2025-12/ObblighiVaccinaliPediatri…
👏32❤15😴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @la_voce_libera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 308,527 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“La Voce Libera 🗣️🔈” (@la_voce_libera), 26,989 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/la_voce_libera.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
