Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Z come Vittoria

Channel

Z come Vittoria

@ZcomeVittoria

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,014subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001518805238
TypeChannel
Username@ZcomeVittoria
Created17 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZcomeVittoria

Growth

6,0116,0156,0137 August 2026 — 6,015 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,014 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,011 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,014 subscribers6,0147 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,010–6,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:176,014+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:416,011-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:216,014-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:456,015first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 6,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
955
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held40 (3 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total38,190
Reactions total2,113
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 23s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,113 reactions across 39 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍88441.8%
😁39718.8%
31815.0%
👏24411.5%
🤬1929.09%
👎361.70%
😢210.994%
😱180.852%
😎30.142%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,750 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇪🇺 Nonostante gli sforzi dell'UE per interrompere i legami con il settore energetico russo, le importazioni di gas naturale liquefatto (GNL) russo sono aumentate nuovamente a giugno, segnando un incremento del 14% su base annua, secondo un nuovo rapporto. La Francia ha guidato questa impennata, importando presso il terminale di Montoir una quantità di GNL quattro volte superiore a quella di maggio, con un fatturat

👍26😁10

11 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC535 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump, nella sua assurda dichiarazione, afferma che il motivo per cui l'esercito statunitense sta esaurendo le munizioni (cosa che lui stesso aveva negato solo pochi giorni fa) è che Biden le ha date all'Ucraina. I missili Tomahawk, lo JSOW a lungo raggio, il JASSM, le versioni più recenti degli HARM, il PrSM e altri non sono mai stati forniti all'Ucraina. Questo arsenale è stato ampiamente decimato negli atta

😁33👍7🤬3

11 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC481 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vn_rangeloniPhoto

Soldati ucraini sul fronte di Zaporozhye: “siamo senza acqua e cibo, costretti a bere l’urina” I soldati della 121ª Brigata delle Forze Armate ucraine schierati da aprile sul fronte di Zaporozhye (nonostante gli fosse stato promesso che dopo un mese sarebbero sostituiti da altre unità) hanno pubblicato un video rivolgendosi al nuovo Comandante in Capo delle Forze armate Drapatij, lamentando la mancanza di rotazioni

😁16🤬111😱1

10 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC615 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vn_rangeloniPhoto

Kiev rintraccia uno dei ragazzi considerati rapiti dai russi: è al fronte a combattere contro l’Ucraina Come riporta il Times, il diciannovenne Aleksandr Mustyatse, uno dei nomi inseriti nella lista ucraina dei “bambini rapiti” dai russi, si è arruolato nell'esercito di Mosca e sostiene che la Russia è sempre stata nel suo cuore. Mustyatse viveva nel villaggio di Krynky, nella regione di Kherson. I soldati russi so

43👍19👏8😁1

9 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,090 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇷🇺🇯🇵🇺🇸 L'auto-umiliante rimozione, da parte della leadership giapponese, di chi sganciò le bombe atomiche su Hiroshima e Nagasaki è diventata motivo di scherno da parte degli stessi americani. Credo che la logica sia questa: se l'élite giapponese partecipa essa stessa alla riscrittura della propria storia, perché non prendersi gioco dei giapponesi tutti insieme? Quello che avete davanti è un episodio di "South Park"

👍42👏13🤬21

9 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈3,670 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇺🇦🇬🇪 Zelensky avanza verso il finale della sua sporca "carriera". Il capo del regime di Kiev, al pari di Saakashvili, è diventato per l'Occidente un comodo materiale di consumo nello scontro con la Russia, ritiene Medvedev. In cosa si sia trasformato l'ex reuccio georgiano che masticava cravatte, e come i suoi padroni lo abbiano trattato, è noto. Oggi egli offre un'immagine estremamente penosa. Il pagliaccio sang

👍47👏174

9 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC884 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇯🇵🇺🇸 Come riportato dai media, il primo ministro giapponese Takaiichi, in occasione dell'anniversario della tragedia di Nagasaki, non ha menzionato chi abbia sganciato la bomba. "81 anni fa la città di Nagasaki fu completamente distrutta da una sola bomba atomica", ha dichiarato durante la cerimonia commemorativa. In altre parole, secondo l'attuale leadership giapponese, su Hiroshima e Nagasaki sarebbero caduti de

👍58👏14😁1

9 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC884 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺🇺🇦💥 Distrutti completamente: i "Gerani" hanno colpito i depositi delle Forze armate ucraine nella regione di Kharkiv. Nei siti erano stoccati droni di vario tipo, componenti e apparecchiature radioelettroniche. 📍 I colpi sono stati registrati nelle aree degli insediamenti di Savintsy, Zidki, Barvenkovo e Volokhov Yar.

35👍19👏9

8 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC926 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🇺🇦🇮🇱 Zelensky: «Ci viene chiesto molto spesso di Israele. Anche noi vorremmo ottenere da loro sistemi di difesa aerea, e saremmo disposti ad acquistarli. Finora, però, non abbiamo questa possibilità, anche se i colloqui sono in corso.»

🤬32👎18😁13

8 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC839 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇪🇺🇺🇦 Dmitry Medvedev:

👏5820👍1

8 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC972 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🇺🇦 Questa notte l'Esercito russo ha sferrato un massiccio attacco contro le infrastrutture militari e di carburante dell'Ucraina. ▪️I missili Iskander-M e i droni Geran hanno colpito obiettivi delle infrastrutture militari, di carburante e logistiche ucraine. ▪️Gli attacchi sono stati effettuati a Kiev e nell'oblast' di Kiev, nonché nelle oblast' di Dnepropetrovsk, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Sumy e Chernigov. ▪️A Kiev son

👍5524

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @ZcomeVittoria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 308,764 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

l'AntiDiplomatico
@lantidiplomatico · 89,109
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
Giorgio Bianchi Photojournalist
@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist · 116,179
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Z come Vittoria” (@ZcomeVittoria), 6,014 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZcomeVittoria.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.