Torna Report, stasera divano e pop corn La prima puntata del programma di inchiesta senza Sigfrido Ranucci (che rosica)
😁32💩18🔥12👍3🤣3👎2🤔2🥴2

Channel
@nicolaporroufficiale
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,807subscribers
+2,875 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001216514229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nicolaporroufficiale |
| Description | 📌 Canale Telegram ufficiale di Nicola Porro 💻 Sito nicolaporro.it 🗞 Vicedirettore Il Giornale 📺 Conduttore Quarta Repubblica 🍵 Ogni mattina la zuppa di Porro sulla mia pagina Facebook |
| Created | 9 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nicolaporroufficiale |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:47 | 32,807 | +3 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:07 | 32,804 | +17 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:48 | 32,787 | +10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 32,777 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:55 | 32,772 | +37 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 32,735 | +101 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:05 | 32,634 | +135 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:15 | 32,499 | +158 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 32,341 | +74 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 32,267 | +116 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:14 | 32,151 | +140 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 32,011 | +120 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 31,891 | +111 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 31,780 | +162 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:50 | 31,618 | +155 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 31,463 | +34 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:07 | 31,429 | +22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 31,407 | +17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 31,390 | +17 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 31,373 | first reading |
1,900 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 158 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 691 of 693 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,900 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,278,864 |
| Reactions total | 84,490 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 20:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
117,407 reactions across 998 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23,893 | 20.4% | |
| 💩 | 17,003 | 14.5% | |
| 🤬 | 12,750 | 10.9% | |
| 👏 | 12,008 | 10.2% | |
| 🤮 | 11,675 | 9.94% | |
| 🤡 | 8,825 | 7.52% | |
| 🤣 | 4,788 | 4.08% | |
| 🔥 | 4,157 | 3.54% | |
| 🤔 | 3,906 | 3.33% | |
| ❤ | 3,612 | 3.08% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2,092 | 1.78% | |
| 🖕 | 1,882 | 1.60% | |
| 😁 | 1,869 | 1.59% | |
| 🙏 | 1,561 | 1.33% | |
| 🍾 | 1,202 | 1.02% | |
| 👎 | 980 | 0.835% | |
| 😱 | 896 | 0.763% | |
| 🥱 | 705 | 0.6% | |
| 🤷♀ | 570 | 0.485% | |
| 😈 | 454 | 0.387% | |
| 43 further kinds | 2,579 | 2.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117,407 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 693 posts held from the last 30 days (0.144%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Torna Report, stasera divano e pop corn La prima puntata del programma di inchiesta senza Sigfrido Ranucci (che rosica)
😁32💩18🔥12👍3🤣3👎2🤔2🥴2
Abdul El Sayed, l’ipocrisia sinistra su come si veste Lui celebrato come il nuovo Obama, lei ammirata per il suo abbigliamento «modesto». Ma c'è una curiosa contraddizione tra i precetti islamici e lo stile del candidato
🤡56💩38🤮14🖕3🔥2👍1
Pasolini, il dettaglio sulla morte che ancora mi fa impressione Dopo oltre 50anni si riapre l'indagine sullo scrittore. Spunta una persona mai ascoltata: potrebbe svelare i mandanti e gli esecutori
🤔25🙏7❤6👍3🔥2🤨1😁1
L’incubo rosso: la sinistra prepara la rivoluzione Il programma del leader della sinistra radicale francese fa discutere: dalle pensioni a 60 anni al divieto delle eredità, fino all'uscita dalla NATO e dal nucleare
🤮63🤡26💩22🖕8🔥6❤4👍1🤷♂1
Imbarazzo Speranza, inciampa sui numeri dei vaccini Durante la seconda audizione sul Covid, l'ex ministro contesta un'affermazione sui casi di effetti avversi, ma i calcoli sembrano dargli torto
🤬74💩59🤡24🖕16😈4🔥3❤2🤷♂2
Di Battista fa tremare Conte: il nuovo incubo del campo largo Schierarsi vola nei sondaggi e l'ex grillino potrebbe tentare la corsa solitaria alle prossime politiche. A rischio soprattutto i voti del Movimento 5 Stelle e i sogni di rimonta del centrosinistra
🤡63🤣54🤷♀8👍7👏3🐳2🤪2❤1
Zuppa di Porro dell’8 novembre 2026 Rassegna stampa quotidiana
❤32👍22👏2🤷♂2👎1
“Cani addestrati per stuprare”. La grande fake dell’Albanese La relatrice ONU chiama in causa gli allevatori europei, ma il confine tra fatti documentati e accuse senza riscontri diventa il cuore della polemica. E riaffiorano vecchi episodi e nuove contestazioni sul suo operato
🤬84💩72🤡51🔥9🖕6🤔4🤮4🤷♂3
Milano 2027: se FdI converge su Sardone, Forza Italia corre al primo turno con Perego. Poi alleanza al ballottaggio Retroscena su Palazzo Marino: il centrodestra alla prova di Milano tra Lega, Forza Italia e il nodo Sardone-Perego
👎31🤷♂18🤔9🤮9❤4👍3🤡3🥴3
Campo largo, 10 tavoli e solo litigi: immaginate questi al governo Dalla patrimoniale all'Ucraina, passando per la giustizia: Schlein, Conte e soci sono divisi su tutto. Ma il centrodestra farebbe male a sottovalutarli
😁52🤮40🤡38🔥7❤4💩4🤣4👍3
Dem al Congresso, ma l’America vota per la proprietà contro il Fisco predone
🤣63👍22👏9🤷♂4❤2🔥1
Addio salamelle, meglio Allah: il Pd ora cerca voti direttamente in moschea
💩197🤮57🔥17🤡13🖕7👎4🤷♀3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,900 posts we hold for @nicolaporroufficiale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nicola Porro” (@nicolaporroufficiale), 32,807 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nicolaporroufficiale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.