LA GUERRA DELL’OCCIDENTE AI BAMBINI L'FSB ha arrestato tre adolescenti nel territorio di PrimorskIJ che hanno raccolto dati sui luoghi di residenza dei partecipanti alla Operazione militare speciale su istruzione dei servizi ucraini I tre su minorenni delle città di Nakhodka e Vladivostok, agendo su istruzioni ucraine avevano raccolto informazioni sul personale militare coinvolte in un'operazione militare special…

Channel
Aiutateci A Salvare I Bambini ODV
@AASIB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,187subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001005998238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AASIB |
| Created | 10 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AASIB |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 1,187 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 1,182 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,181 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 1,180 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 1,180 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.8%
- avg views ÷ 1,187 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 329
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.75%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (3 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,953 |
| Reactions total | 187 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://t.me/AASIB "Essere, non apparire" Una piccola città della Russia europea Aiutateci a Salvare i Bambini ODV
https://t.me/AASIB ⚡️ Le forze armate ucraine oggi hanno attaccato un ospedale a Donezk, uccidendo una donna e ferendone altre due. Una gravemente. Ogni giorno si contano atti di terrorismo da parte NATO UE attraverso il loro braccio armato criminale ucraino. Ospedali, asili, scuole, autoambulanze, parchi gioco, spiaggie gli obiettivi dei bombardamenti di Kiev. Chi arma un assassino è complice. Von den Leyen, Meloni…
Il funzionario francese Xavier Moreau è stato sanzionato dall'Unione Europea per aver criticato l'attacco delle forze armate ucraine a un college a Starobelsk, che ha causato la morte di 21 adolescenti. 💭 In altre parole, l'Occidente non solo non condanna questo crimine di guerra, ma punisce coloro che lo denunciano. Questo indica che l'Occidente stesso è complice di questi crimini. Ovviamente, non può condannarsi d…
https://t.me/AASIB Dietro ogni bambino morto, ferito, mutilato nel Donbass e in Russia, dietro ogni bambino senza più servizi sociali in Ucraina ci sono i soldi, la tecnologia, l'intelligence anglosassoni, europei e italiani. Le risorse finanziarie europee e italiane per assassinare bambini, oltre che crimini di guerra, sono un furto ai cittadini. Questi miliardi non si creano spontaneamente. Vengono SPOSTATI da un …
https://t.me/AASIB Taisja A. Chernjavskaja Aiutateci a Salvare i Bambini ODV
https://t.me/AASIB Taisja A. Chernjavskaja è specialista in ecografia-diagnostica e ostetrica-ginecologa, da qualche settimana è il nuovo Difensore civico per i diritti dei bambini della DNR. Abbiamo tradotto una Sua intervista sulla situazione dell'infanzia nel Donbass. Per conoscere, fuori dalla propaganda guerrafondaia e dalle miserrime tifoserie. Buona lettura. Aiutateci a Salvare i Bambini ODV
https://t.me/AASIB/ Il criminale attacco ucraino con un drone su una spiaggia vicino a Gelendzhik il 3 agosto scorso ha ucciso 7 persone. Tra i morti c'erano 4 bambini. Due bambine vivevano nella città di Shachta, nella regione di Rostov na Donu. Bambine che ancora non frequentavano la scuola, una di loro aveva 5 anni, la seconda ancora più piccola. Il terzo bambino assassinato - nella fotografia - aveva 9 anni e vi…
https://t.me/AASIB/ SOS KSJUSHA 4 ANNI La bambina sta proseguendo le terapie, ha iniziato a parlare e la mamma, con la quale siamo sempre in contatto, oggi ci ha detto: "Ci stiamo lentamente riprendendo, Ksyusha ha iniziato a parlare sillabe, ci sta provando. Grazie mille per la preoccupazione e vicinanza" Per aiutare Ksjusha online https://www.aasib.org/ksjusha-b-2/ Con bonifico bancario, di seguito le nostre co…
https://t.me/AASIB Il numero dei bambini assassinati ieri da NATO UE sulla spiaggia di Gelendizhik è salito a 4. 58 i feriti, 12 dei quali bambini Con l'immenso orgoglio del ministro della guerra Crosetto Aiutateci a Salvare i Bambini ODV
https://t.me/AASIB Dodici i bambini rimasti feriti ieri in seguito nell'attacco ucraino con droni avvenuto ad Arkhipo-Osipovka, vicino a Gelendžik, come ha comunicato lo stato maggiore operativo della regione di Kuban. Aiutateci a Salvare i Bambini ODV
https://t.me/AASIB Aqua, pane, prodotti per l'igiene. Continua la nostra opera a Miniera Gagarin. Aiuti umanitari per la vita dei bambini, mentre l'Italia ufficiale manda droni e morte. Aiutateci a Salvare i Bambini ODV
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @AASIB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 471,198 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@giorgiobianchiphotojournalist · 116,179
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aiutateci A Salvare I Bambini ODV” (@AASIB), 1,187 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AASIB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.