⭐️ stem the tide - преградить путь, приостанавливать, сдерживать We have to stem the tide of emigration if our economy is to recover. Нам нужно сдержать миграцию, чтобы наша экономика восстановилась. @ieltstoeflcefrr

Channel
🇬🇧 Learn English 🇬🇧
@ieltstoeflcefrr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
65,374subscribers
-107 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001179807965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ieltstoeflcefrr |
| Description | Хочешь говорить на английском как носитель? Тогда ты по адресу! Реклама: @frank_adv |
| Created | 17 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ieltstoeflcefrr |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 65,374 | +3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 65,371 | +22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 65,349 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 65,352 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 65,372 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 65,377 | +28 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 65,349 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 65,341 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:24 | 65,335 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 65,351 | -32 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 65,383 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 65,391 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 65,404 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 65,413 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 65,423 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 65,432 | -53 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 65,485 | -26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 65,511 | +29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 65,482 | +9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 65,473 | first reading |
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.29%
- avg views ÷ 65,374 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,110
- 92 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 92
- of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 150 (31 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 378,560 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 341
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 142
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Everything _____ in large amounts (Все имеет значение в больших количествах)
- means35%
- counts65%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Monday _____ better for me (Мне больше подходит понедельник)
- works72%
- will be28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⭐️ get through to - связаться (особенно по телефону) It's hard to get through to Janet because her telephone line is always busy. До Джанет трудно дозвониться, потому что у нее постоянно занята линия. @ieltstoeflcefrr
An easy _____ (Легкая добыча)
- prey61%
- pray39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⭐️ have over - принимать гостей у себя дома Why don't we have Mr. and Mrs. Jones over for dinner tonight? Почему бы нам не пригласить сегодня вечером на ужин мистера и миссис Джонс? @ieltstoeflcefrr
Let's _____ it a day (Давай на этом закончим)
- sign37%
- call63%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I'm really _____ (Я просто выжат, как лимон)
- drained75%
- slick25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⭐️ fill someone's shoes - занять чье-либо место, заменить кого-либо Although he is a good supervisor, he is unable to fill the shoes of those who came before him. Хотя он и хороший руководитель, он не в состоянии заменить тех, кто был до него. @ieltstoeflcefrr
Thank you from the _____ of my heart (Спасибо вам от всего сердца)
- bottom72%
- fullness28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
⭐️ ahead of the game - сделать более, чем необходимо We worked hard all week in order to be ahead of the game on Monday morning. Мы всю неделю много работали, чтобы успеть все сделать к утру понедельника. @ieltstoeflcefrr
That was the last _____ (Это была последняя капля)
- time22%
- straw78%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @ieltstoeflcefrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 89 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Everything _____ in large amounts (Все имеет значение в больших количествах)
- means35%
- counts65%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Monday _____ better for me (Мне больше подходит понедельник)
- works72%
- will be28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
An easy _____ (Легкая добыча)
- prey61%
- pray39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Let's _____ it a day (Давай на этом закончим)
- sign37%
- call63%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I'm really _____ (Я просто выжат, как лимон)
- drained75%
- slick25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Thank you from the _____ of my heart (Спасибо вам от всего сердца)
- bottom72%
- fullness28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@fuckingenglish · 312,495#1
@english2020easy · 239,850#2
@EnglishBestChannel · 161,966#3
@EngInPhrases · 20,660#4
@Factura_Shop · 30,573#5
@spaceofeng · 124,369#6
@veryenglink · 57,131#7
@anglyski_yazik_plus · 30,360#8
@seriesenglishhh · 97,665#9
@ieltscope · 36,816#10
@eng_boss · 6,679#11
@state_english · 243,336#12
@dailyeng · 73,242#13
@idioms_for_you · 5,822#14
@englishtg1 · 51,990#15
@EnglishByEar · 41,826#16
@english_by_mistakes · 2,949#17
@englishmeme · 11,050#18
@UnknownEnglish · 6,155#19
@englbymems · 4,479#20
@logicalEnglish · 3,016#21
@GoEnglishRus · 83,795#22
@memusa · 8,729#23
@puzzleng · 11,108#24
@unchildish_english · 41,981#25
@English_Testi · 8,955#26
@Angliyskiy_yaziki · 34,281#27
@english_mindd · 44,605#28
@anglyskyi_yazyk · 83,503#29
@hot_idioms · 54,391#30
@debilenglish · 61,203#31
@ruGrammar · 121,218#32
@EnglishScript · 45,194#33
@anglysky_yazyki · 57,867#34
@studyqa · 157,327#35
@samorasvitia_opros · 157,396#36
@free_edu · 309,367#37
@Reddit · 162,484#38
@pravoinf · 32,968#39
@English_Books_TG · 45,920#40
@laz_english · 8,383#41
@anglyskyb · 19,633#42
@brokoledu · 43,105#43
@slovar_psikhologia · 83,517#44
@english_duolingo · 50,279#45
@IELTSwMasters · 110,235#46
@english_hour · 3,827#47
@BadEnglishEasy · 12,876#48
@itsallinenglish · 87,569#49
@lifeyt · 330,253#50
@english_Alyona · 9,978#51
@kurbanoffnet · 14,697#52
@zapiski_redaktorki · 94,724#53
@englishrise · 5,699#54
@anglyskya · 20,017#55
@katy_english · 5,489#56
@anglijski_perevod · 16,811#57
@your_practice · 17,679#58
@south_work · 131,865#59
@english_teacher_moscow · 7,564#60
@you_ielts · 12,536#61
@English_legko · 8,814#62
@MinOfEnglish · 3,624#63
@uzmdk · 201,496#64
@meduzalive · 1,121,201#65
@twitt_ota · 332,521#66
@pressauz · 295,178#67
@trolluz · 78,754#68
@gazetauz · 86,091#69
@makarenko_channel · 36,030#70
@Khusan57 · 98,973#71
@spotuz · 26,833#72
@bugfeature · 574,657#73
@hacks_excel · 284,445#74
@afishauz · 32,854#75
@kudapoytiuz · 34,245#76
@etoparta_pro · 8,993#77
@AphorismTG · 108,149#78
@shmirziyoyev · 244,893#79
@grantlar · 79,122#80
@Perevod_s_bogatogo · 17,703#81
@from_japan · 27,986#82
@samo_razvitije · 2,711#83
@RECENT_IELTS · 17,430#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@engslov · 88,982
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
@EnglishBestChannel · 161,966
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
@fuckingenglish · 312,495
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
@anglyski_yazik_plus · 30,360
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@veryenglink · 57,131
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@ieltscope · 36,816
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
@debilenglish · 61,203
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
@hot_idioms · 54,391
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@dailyeng · 73,242
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@EnglishByEar · 41,826
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
@english2020easy · 239,850
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@unchildish_english · 41,981
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
@englishtg1 · 51,990
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@EnglishBooksTG · 23,415
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
@spaceofeng · 124,369
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@Angliyskiy_yaziki · 34,281
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
@anglyskyi_yazyk · 83,503
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
@EnglishUSA_1 · 155,828
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
@sscpreviousyeargkqu · 31,959
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 5 September 2026
@anglysky_yazyki · 57,867
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
@EnglishScript · 45,194
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
@English_Grammar_IELTS_TOEFL · 277,464
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
@state_english · 243,336
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@slovar_psikhologia · 83,517
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇬🇧 Learn English 🇬🇧” (@ieltstoeflcefrr), 65,374 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieltstoeflcefrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.