Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Модная скряга

Channel

Модная скряга

@fashionscrooge

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,990subscribers

-307 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001175298783
TypeChannel
Username@fashionscrooge
DescriptionРоссийские бренды, тренд-аналитика, маршруты шопоголика по Москве. Канал в MAX: https://max.ru/fashionscrooge По вопросам сотрудничества: @julia_scrooge
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fashionscrooge

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,33123,25121,2917 August 2026 — 22,297 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,459 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,158 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,251 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,418 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,779 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,588 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,510 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,390 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,528 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,605 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,531 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,427 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,318 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,173 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,081 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,025 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,986 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,898 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,861 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,838 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,781 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,725 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,669 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,637 subscribers4 September 2026 — 19,602 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,509 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,394 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,331 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,488 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,680 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,971 subscribers26 September 2026 — 21,990 subscribers21,9907 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -307. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,743–23,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 20:4221,990+2,019
17 Sept 2026, 16:3819,971+291
15 Sept 2026, 13:1719,680+192
13 Sept 2026, 20:3819,488+157
12 Sept 2026, 03:3819,331-63
9 Sept 2026, 20:3919,394-115
6 Sept 2026, 16:5919,509-93
4 Sept 2026, 04:3719,602-35
2 Sept 2026, 16:4719,637-32
1 Sept 2026, 15:5319,669-56
31 Aug 2026, 12:2419,725-56
30 Aug 2026, 12:4719,781-57
29 Aug 2026, 15:5919,838-23
28 Aug 2026, 16:0719,861-37
27 Aug 2026, 19:3719,898-88
26 Aug 2026, 19:5219,986-39
25 Aug 2026, 19:1220,025-56
24 Aug 2026, 16:0520,081-92
22 Aug 2026, 21:0820,173-145
21 Aug 2026, 12:5420,318first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.65%
avg views ÷ 21,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held37 (31 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total11,410
Reactions total662
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,450
Videos
≈383
Links
≈697

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,135 reactions across 37 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,02932.8%
🔥68321.8%
👍52716.8%
😍2477.88%
❤‍🔥2417.69%
🤩1354.31%
💯862.74%
😁752.39%
🥰541.72%
🤣230.734%
🕊110.351%
💘90.287%
🍓60.191%
👌60.191%
👀20.064%
🐳10.032%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.41%
2 of 37 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
914
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,220
over 35 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2bL9aMPo2e49hMef4pezSqxFri116 August 202616 August 2026
F7NfYUJRWmqqH7eNuaVh118 August 202618 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,580 views113 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

На выходных 3-4 октября идем на beauty bazaar day. Выписала себе несколько брендов, которые не хочу пропустить: Remez. Помню в рекламе у Рогова, вживую не знакома с фенами, посмотрела бы мастер-классы по укладкам. Зашла на сайт, но вместо фена приметила пылесос 😁 Physicians Formula. Жду новинки. Обожаю их пудру с эффектом свечения, но пользуюсь не по назначению, а только поверх кремовых румян) Mesopharm — проф кос…

❤45👍33😍20🔥15

27 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,800 views109 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Я за бабкины и дедкины тренды почти всегда, но только не носки)) С удовольствием посмотрю, но у самой нога не поворачивается носить. Хоть кто-нибудь внедрил за эти годы? Тренду сто лет. На фото образы Недели моды в Милане весна-лето 2027.

❤47🔥25❤‍🔥21👍16

26 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,960 views121 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Напоследок притащила охотничьи сапоги, чем добила его окончательно 🔫

❤49😁31🤣23❤‍🔥18

25 Sept 2026, 22:13 UTC≈1,540 views126 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Новое дерзкое ограбление: пропали три пары бархатных джинсов в MAAG! Я застряла в примерочной под закрытие и не могла выбрать между коричневыми, зелеными и синими. Оправдываю преступление тем, что у них разная посадка и все цвета найду, с чем сочетать 🙈 Приглянулась двусторонняя дубленка, муж предложил к ней барсетку. Обдумываю..

🔥55❤35😁22🤩14

23 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTC≈2,310 views87 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

При длительном отсутствии подготовила еженедельный отчет 🤓 1. ТЦ Семеновский. Заскочить в Токио Рамен, проверить ассортимент Оффпрайса (из интересного балетки Хилфигер за 5к, много мужского — пиджаки по 9к, рубашки 4к, чемоданы 10-15к в зависимости от размера. Чемодан American tourister за 10к вместо 20. Но лучше в Фамилию поискать слив Рогова и Choux. Магазин для творчества Yamogu, где выбегаешь от навязчивых прода…

❤47👍20🔥15🤩5

18 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,220 views106 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ну какие сумочки теперь делает Furla 😍 Очки тоже заверните)))

❤43🔥36❤‍🔥20🤩7

1 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC950 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Финишная прямая школьного марафона — Balabala! 🥳 Каждый сезон мы сюда возвращаемся не просто потому что красиво. У Balabala приятные ткани, их оценят дети, которые замечают каждый колючий шовчик и неудобный воротник. Проверено моим требовательным экспертом. Ассортимент между магазинами отличается. Оставляю ссылки на понравившиеся вещи, если захотите заказать на Lamoda: 🐚 комплект сарафан + жакет 🐚 голубой кардиган…

💯21❤20❤‍🔥14👍14

1 Sept 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,280 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Моя первоклашка ❤️ Поздравляем всех с 1 сентября!

❤36🔥24🕊11💘4

31 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,290 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Валокордин ✅

😍17🔥14👍10🥰4

31 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈2,760 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Как я ощущаю наступающее 1 сентября 1 класс 🤣 Футболка Taboo

❤18🤩13❤‍🔥7😁7

30 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,250 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Фотографировать так, будто мы тут одни 🏆 Хотя желающих поступить в Хогвартс сегодня собралось немало)) 📍Турандот

❤23😍19❤‍🔥16🥰6

28 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈1,220 views83 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Буу! Страшно? Вот и мне было сегодня 😁 Мы вернулись с иммерсивного спектакля «Вернувшиеся: Новая реальность». Особняк Дашков 5 в этот раз особенно атмосферный и жуткий. Формат неизменный — в вашем распоряжении 4 этажа, молча следуете за любыми актерами и пытаетесь вникнуть в сюжет. Если некомфортно от недопонимания как минимум до середины (это я ✋), то ознакомьтесь с содержанием пьесы Генрика Ибсена «Привидения». Миг…

❤28❤‍🔥23🔥21🤩11

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @fashionscrooge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Модная скумбрия
@fashion_skumbria · 12,108
#1
Выпало из шкафа
@felloutofthecloset · 395
#2
невинное феминное
@nevinnoefeminnoe · 12,662
#3
Модный сарафан
@alenamorozowa · 757
#4
Вошла в роль
@voshlavrol · 394
#5
Мне нечего надеть!
@netodezdi · 8,384
#6
Без принципов, но с сумкой
@kudriashovaa · 23,354
#7
Модная Курочка
@ya_b_kupila · 22,715
#8
Поперчить стилем
@poperchitstilem · 10,878
#9
Коза с чемоданом
@travelprofi2 · 3,654
#10
Беру не глядя
@beru_ne_glyadya · 1,852
#11
Очень модные дела
@in_style_we_trust · 1,793
#12
Алтарь шопоголизма
@fashionebelnaya · 263
#13
Стиль с акцентом
@vseprostyl · 523
#14
BreefStyle
@lanabrif · 426
#15
Стильный сноб
@stilny_snob · 2,936
#16
Закаленная стилем
@zakalennaya_stilem · 1,455
#17
Губёшки Матрёшки
@naturolacosmetics · 11,577
#18
Это мы сохраняем!
@mamkibanki · 12,768
#19
Проявляю выдержку
@sokollovskayaa · 971
#20
Министерство фэшн дел
@olia_lebe · 12,663
#21
Женская обитель
@womensmonastery · 1,942
#22
Женская солянка
@womensolyanka · 8,130
#23
Навигатор стиля | Елена Мильман
@milenvibe · 1,032
#24
Право на женственность
@pravonazenstvenost · 1,347
#25
Главная по тарелочкам
@nelzyaotkladivat · 12,213
#26
Чекап избушки
@checkupizbushki · 5,713
#27
Девочки, это база!
@ice_crem74 · 10,296
#28
Женщина, которая строит | Лира Дюваль
@Museforamillion · 1,167
#29
Кот-де-Вин
@cotesdevin · 12,614
#30
Философия гедонистки
@philosophy_of_a_hedonist · 6,223
#31
Культурный силуэт
@fashion_deciphered · 10,484
#32
Создаю в них уют
@today_weareyoung · 9,349
#33
Намажь это немедленно
@namazh_eto_nemedlenno · 11,953
#34
Культурная сорока
@pie_with_magpie · 826
#35
Девица в платьице
@Maidfashion · 11,113 (as read 26 September 2026)
#36
БЕРЕГАСЕБЯ
@beregasebya · 6,153
#37
в гостях у марики
@marika_pataki · 176
#38
Принципы принцессы
@principled_princess · 282
#39
Милфунья
@laskaet_glaz · 579
#40
куры не клюют
@tamara_prosto · 1,373
#41
Настя без границ
@bulkityping · 6,919
#42
Решительно на шпильках
@powethree · 439
#43
На перевоспитании у сына
@na_perevospitanii · 7,405
#44
Натянуто за уши
@dr_amisurgery · 2,983
#45
Молчать бессильна!
@yes_itwas · 1,525
#46
Сумочка, мы уходим!
@sumochka_bye_bye · 10,260
#47
Саша Суралмаша
@sashasuralmashaaa · 12,571
#48
За контурок? Ок!
@zakonturok · 2,937
#49
dudovamind | Дарья Дудова
@coach_for_tech · 294
#50
ALBINALAND
@albinalands · 7,154
#51
Твою ж мать!
@kakdelarodila · 5,383
#52
Визуальная манка
@storiesMKramer · 28,345
#53
Бездонные траты
@kudriashdash · 5,946
#54
манера держаться
@viktoriahey · 16,386
#55
Готовьте кошельки
@koshelky · 27,163
#56
Доспехи женщины
@truedevochka · 17,480
#57
В женской шкуре
@elya_bulochka · 49,281
#58
Сорокалетние подростки
@krupchat · 20,933
#59
Сначала крем, потом поем
@snachalakrem · 21,740
#60
Лук в песочницу
@talahasya · 4,593
#61
Дневник Бриджет Жорс
@MrsBridgetJors · 4,917
#62
ДИКТАТУРА КРАСОТЫ
@ok_blog · 5,986
#63
Не козерог, а крыса
@irina_dmitris_fengshui · 20,066
#64
Будни душнилы
@dushnilacom · 305
#65
Хьюстон, у нас про кремы
@liltoxbtch · 7,288
#66
мне вон те булки
@MneVonTeBulki · 10,995
#67
жопа луковичкой
@dash_kupi_garazh · 31,299
#68
Бутерброд и культпоход
@kultbuter · 1,895
#69
Бескультурье
@unculterdland · 152
#70
От Невы до Амура
@FromNevaToAmur · 5,352
#71
Виноваты гормоны
@gorm_sboy · 10,587
#72
ЗОЖ и кутеж
@fitness_binge · 126
#73
Пломбируйтесь
@plombiruites · 217
#74
Рина Тарантиновна
@mamkinochtivo · 410
#75
Говорите, вы в эфире!
@govoritevefire · 5,771
#76
Зазожники красоты
@zazozhniki · 944
#77
Что с вами так
@svamivsetak · 5,288
#78
Достань свой липстик
@and_kri · 83
#79
Всем чин-чин
@iren_champ · 897
#80
Полетели? ✈️
@Polletelli · 2,017
#81
хоум терапия
@homepsyh · 20,716
#82
нателеграмил(а)
@vamvtg · 15,626
#83
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 281,654
#84
Словарный жопас
@nasty_notes · 21,809
#85
Гедонизм и реализм
@nasvobodnuytemy · 10,180
#86
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,158
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anastasia_Parfenova
@anastasia_parfenova_stylist · 31,111
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 6 September 2026
Сорокалетние подростки
@krupchat · 20,933
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
Не козерог, а крыса
@irina_dmitris_fengshui · 20,066
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
Словарный жопас
@nasty_notes · 21,809
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Модная скряга” (@fashionscrooge), 21,990 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashionscrooge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.