Channel
@marika_pataki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
177subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001557956271 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marika_pataki |
| Description | уютный блог о романтизации тихой жизни, книгах, канцелярии и прочих радостях |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marika_pataki |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 177 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (9 September 2026 – 16 September 2026) |
| Views total | 803 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 58.9% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 25.0% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мы уже почти четыре месяца на расстоянии в тысячи километров и самый нелепый абсурд заключается в том, что он по-контракту в Израиле, откуда не может уехать, а меня блядь оттуда ДЕПОРТИРОВАЛИ и я не могу туда въехать. вы представляете какой сюр вообще? мы на одной планете, но мы никак не можем увидеться… вот вообще никак. он не может выехать, а я не могу въехать… какой ебанутый мир, честное слово…
😢7
это как вообще реально?
КОТОРУЮ ТЫ БЛЯДЬ В ЭТО ЖЕ ВОЕМЯ СЛУШАЕШЬ ШТООООО БЛЯДЬ
я тут плачу и страдаю под песню
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
позы Пупырки за последние полчаса:
❤12🔥1
извините, но ай лов барселона ахах блин, честно, настолько рандомные фотки, что по ним прямо видно, что я не планировала этот фотосэйшн, но решила все-таки поделится своим результатом 🌟 ну как вам? это за два месяца
❤10🔥10
было/стало слева постер с работой одного из моих любимых фотографов — Хельмута Ньютона справа, почти уверена, что знакомый всем кадр из фильма «Красотка» с Джулией Робертс я бы не меняла, но подумала, что при продаже квартиры, потенциальных покупателей может смутить жепа торчащая из крокодильей пасти, поэтому пусть будет что-то скромнее 🫢
😁2
пока смотрела фотокарточки из лета, поняла, что их практически нет. из за того, что очень сильно погрузилась в создание контента для ютуба, вся галлерея только в горизонтальных видео и фотках Бусинки, да еды. пора это исправлять и фотографировать чаще 🤳 ладно, осенью введу это в новую привычку
🔥3
немножко закулисья из этого лета:
❤7
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @marika_pataki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“в гостях у марики” (@marika_pataki), 177 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marika_pataki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.