Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Словарный жопас

Channel

Словарный жопас

@nasty_notes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,809subscribers

-4,861 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001963963711
TypeChannel
Username@nasty_notes
DescriptionСомнительный слог, словесный под нос, шутки «за триста» и прочее умничание мамки-лингвиста 🖖 @anasta_siesta 📍СПб 📍Дагестан В семье не без Максимки: https://max.ru/nasty_notes РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68cd61eab75b544a49902926
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nasty_notes

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,80929,44225,625.57 August 2026 — 26,670 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,670 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,530 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,849 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,383 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,461 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,045 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,993 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,544 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,669 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,460 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,580 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,458 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,565 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,442 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,056 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,908 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,078 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,443 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,078 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,885 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,873 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,875 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,634 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,248 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,896 subscribers6 September 2026 — 26,644 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,904 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,856 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,075 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,531 subscribers17 September 2026 — 23,116 subscribers25 September 2026 — 21,809 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -4,861. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,664–30,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 19:4021,809-1,307
17 Sept 2026, 07:3723,116-415
15 Sept 2026, 08:5823,531-544
13 Sept 2026, 19:5824,075-781
12 Sept 2026, 03:3624,856-1,048
9 Sept 2026, 20:1925,904-740
6 Sept 2026, 15:0226,644-252
4 Sept 2026, 05:5526,896-352
2 Sept 2026, 18:3827,248-386
1 Sept 2026, 18:4627,634-241
31 Aug 2026, 20:3927,875+1,002
30 Aug 2026, 20:1326,873-12
29 Aug 2026, 20:1326,885-193
28 Aug 2026, 23:3327,078-365
27 Aug 2026, 19:5827,443-635
26 Aug 2026, 16:5528,078-830
25 Aug 2026, 15:0428,908-148
24 Aug 2026, 17:3329,056-386
23 Aug 2026, 02:1329,442+877
21 Aug 2026, 15:4428,565first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 21,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,790
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held27 (30 June 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total25,090
Reactions total1,444
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
420
Videos
66
Links
228

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,228 reactions across 27 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2,72543.8%
🤣79312.7%
🔥74211.9%
❤66410.7%
🐳3185.11%
😎2153.45%
💯1612.59%
🤪1211.94%
😱821.32%
🤝631.01%
😈610.979%
custom 5370607521314668408570.915%
😍550.883%
👏340.546%
🙏220.353%
❤‍🔥200.321%
💅200.321%
🎄110.177%
🎉90.145%
💊70.112%
14 further kinds480.771%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nasty_notes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,160 views90 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

Утро понедельника — самое время попробовать Ниф-Ниф на незаконно обогащенном с дебильным сиропом. Пока оплата подмышкой, надо брать 😎 Вам что? Авторство: caramelka. coffee

😁64🔥19❤3💅2🤨2

22 Sept 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,610 views226 reactionsread 30 September 2026

У нас пока панибратские Михáлна, Сегéвна и Геннáдя 😏 Прочитала прекрасное обсуждение, как детсадовцы коверкают имена воспитательниц. Выбрала вам хи-хит-парад: Евгения Андреевна — Ебеня Андреевна Жанна Геннадьевна — Жадина-говядина Лиана Владимировна — Ляна Блядина Светлана Геннадьевна — Сметана Говнадьевна Зоя Харитоновна — Зая Коридоровна Зоя Каиргельдиновна — Зая Крокодиловна Роза Робертовна — Ëза Ëбелтовна Надеж…

😁129🔥51🤣29❤11😎5👀1

16 Sept 2026, 06:55 UTC≈3,400 views126 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

А я вчера у стоматолога раздербанила десну, и сегодня интеллигентную отечность Довлатте я наблюдаю в зеркале 😏

😁80❤17🤝16🔥9🤪3🥰1

14 Sept 2026, 19:14 UTC≈3,740 views230 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Диалог с трехлеткой: — Я сегодня в садике писал и какал... — Молодец. — ... мимо! 🤣🤣🤣 Ишь, мамкин шутник растет!

😁157🤣39🔥19😎7🤪4❤3😇1

14 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC≈3,520 views53 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Вы к какой градации интеллигентов себя относите? Настоящая? Вшивая? Любознательный варвар? Предлагаю пощекотать своё интеллигентское любопытство по-настоящему аристократичными знаниями: Какую вазочку захватить на бал Как носить меховые стринги Выбираем блохоловку гастрономические экскременты эксперименты ученых Великая лондонская...вонь! Вот такой офигивайтинг и всякую мелкую фигню собирает в своем канале Алла…

❤26🔥14👏7😁6

14 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,770 views205 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Иду по набережной Фонтанки вдоль Летнего сада. Позади слышны голоса двух дам: — Он наш лучший фонетист! Думаю, ого, филологическая интеллигенция! Обгоняют меня: — ... лучший флейтист! Ага, не расслышала, значит, из консерватории идут. Музыкальная таки интеллигенция! По воде шуршит прогулочный кораблик, экскурсанты неистово машут руками. Туристическая интеллигенция плывет! Сворачиваю на Пестеля. В Соляном переул…

😁152🔥25❤16🤣6💯4🤝2

14 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,480 views230 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Трюк удался Напишу для собратьев-аллергиков: побег от сезонной пыльцы был оправдан В середине апреля мы с трехлеткой-подберезовиком метнулись в Дагестан в надежде избежать проблем с дыханием из-за пыления березы. Глобально трюк удался: проблем с дыханием не было вообще, глаза были чуть припухшие около недели после приезда. В Дагестане в зависимости от местности берез либо нет совсем, либо местами молодые березки вы…

😎170🙏22❤21🎄11🗿3🤝3

13 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC≈2,570 views189 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

*со звуком Это я вернулась из теплого Дагестана в родные питерские болота — а тут +11 и горизонтальный дождь. Самоидентифицируюсь с Винни: надо бы собирать грибы в лису и наводить порядок в берлоге, а меня который день плющит — хочется спать подольше, жрëнц побольше и чая с мёдом...

😁113🔥33🤝20❤8❤‍🔥8😱6🌭1

13 Sept 2026, 15:18 UTC≈2,840 views95 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Poll

Напомните, о чем был блог?

  1. Чо как в Дагестане27%
  2. Детские сопли19%
  3. Где взять деняк на стоматологов9%
  4. Где взять деняк на стоматологов в Питере, ëмаë9%
  5. Куда ставить ударение в «ëмаë»42%
  6. Где взять шуток, чтоб не ëпнуться58%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁57🔥19🎉9👏5🤣3❤2

18 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈6,100 views232 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Дагестанские доктора шутят три Встречаются в коридоре медцентра тетя-пистолет, дядя-расстрелять и пациенты (мы с Лёней). Тётя-пистолет: — Лёня, привет! Дядя-расстрелять: — Эээ, не здоровайся с моими пациентами! — Почему? — Гинеколог отоларингологу не друг! Не зря вас вон куда посадили — на отшибе! Неловкие шутки, перестрелка взглядами... Какая уж тут дружба? Тут пара. Как пистолет и расстрел🤦‍♂️

😁160💯35❤22🔥9🌚4😢2

18 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈5,140 views226 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Дагестанские доктора шутят два Добрый дядя детский лор: — Будем делать уколы. Можно два раза в день, можно один раз сразу суточную дозу. Я: — А как лучше для организма? Можем и два раза приезжать. Лор: — Расстрелять лучше один раз или два? 🤙🤙🤙 Доходчиво?

😁116🤪69😱23❤8💊7🤔2🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈5,070 views275 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Дагестанские доктора шутят раз В коридоре медцентра трехлетка Лёня возится за детским столиком, рядом на диванчике сидит женщина в белом халате. — А как тебя зовут? — Лёня! — Лёня? Какое красивое имя! Лёня, а сколько тебе лет? Лёня не отвлекается от дел: — Тии! — А покажи пальчиками? Лёня продолжает деловито варить мне понарошковый кофе. И тогда тётя начинает показывать сама: — Смотри, это пять, загибаем пальчи…

🤣165😱45🤪33❤12🔥10😁6🤔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @nasty_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Sept 2026, 15:18 UTCAnonymous Poll505 voters

Напомните, о чем был блог?

  1. Чо как в Дагестане27%
  2. Детские сопли19%
  3. Где взять деняк на стоматологов9%
  4. Где взять деняк на стоматологов в Питере, ëмаë9%
  5. Куда ставить ударение в «ëмаë»42%
  6. Где взять шуток, чтоб не ëпнуться58%

The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Говорите, вы в эфире!
@govoritevefire · 5,771
#1
Редактор в перьях
@redaktorvperyah · 4,972
#2
Твою ж мать!
@kakdelarodila · 5,383
#3
Коза с чемоданом
@travelprofi2 · 3,654
#4
Вошла в роль
@voshlavrol · 394
#5
Алтарь шопоголизма
@fashionebelnaya · 263
#6
BreefStyle
@lanabrif · 426
#7
Очень модные дела
@in_style_we_trust · 1,793
#8
Женская солянка
@womensolyanka · 8,130
#9
Выпало из шкафа
@felloutofthecloset · 395
#10
Стильный сноб
@stilny_snob · 2,936
#11
Как жить после 40?
@after40yo · 13,809
#12
Это мы сохраняем!
@mamkibanki · 12,768
#13
Женская обитель
@womensmonastery · 1,942
#14
Главная по тарелочкам
@nelzyaotkladivat · 12,213
#15
БЕРЕГАСЕБЯ
@beregasebya · 6,153
#16
Губёшки Матрёшки
@naturolacosmetics · 11,577
#17
Право на женственность
@pravonazenstvenost · 1,347
#18
Девочки, это база!
@ice_crem74 · 10,296
#19
Проявляю выдержку
@sokollovskayaa · 971
#20
Культурная сорока
@pie_with_magpie · 826
#21
Молчать бессильна!
@yes_itwas · 1,525
#22
От Невы до Амура
@FromNevaToAmur · 5,352
#23
Чекап избушки
@checkupizbushki · 5,713
#24
Решительно на шпильках
@powethree · 439
#25
невинное феминное
@nevinnoefeminnoe · 12,662
#26
Натянуто за уши
@dr_amisurgery · 2,983
#27
Кот-де-Вин
@cotesdevin · 12,614
#28
Рина Тарантиновна
@mamkinochtivo · 410
#29
Зазожники красоты
@zazozhniki · 944
#30
Милфунья
@laskaet_glaz · 579
#31
Девица в платьице
@Maidfashion · 11,250 (as read 19 September 2026)
#32
Принципы принцессы
@principled_princess · 282
#33
Создаю в них уют
@today_weareyoung · 9,349
#34
Намажь это немедленно
@namazh_eto_nemedlenno · 11,953
#35
Всем чин-чин
@iren_champ · 897
#36
Мне нечего надеть!
@netodezdi · 8,384
#37
Саша Суралмаша
@sashasuralmashaaa · 12,571
#38
dudovamind | Дарья Дудова
@coach_for_tech · 294
#39
Настя без границ
@bulkityping · 6,919
#40
Что с вами так
@svamivsetak · 5,288
#41
Министерство фэшн дел
@olia_lebe · 12,663
#42
Философия гедонистки
@philosophy_of_a_hedonist · 6,223
#43
ALBINALAND
@albinalands · 7,154
#44
На перевоспитании у сына
@na_perevospitanii · 7,405
#45
Богини не стареют
@bogininestareut · 11,303
#46
За контурок? Ок!
@zakonturok · 2,937
#47
мне вон те булки
@MneVonTeBulki · 10,995
#48
Будни душнилы
@dushnilacom · 305
#49
жопа луковичкой
@dash_kupi_garazh · 31,299
#50
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 281,654
#51
Кружок кройки бытия
@Kruzhok_kroyki_bytiya · 6,175
#52
манера держаться
@viktoriahey · 16,386
#53
Бездонные траты
@kudriashdash · 5,946
#54
Доспехи женщины
@truedevochka · 17,480
#55
Дневник Бриджет Жорс
@MrsBridgetJors · 4,917
#56
Гедонизм и реализм
@nasvobodnuytemy · 10,180
#57
В женской шкуре
@elya_bulochka · 49,281
#58
Патч на все лицо
@po_krassote · 19,938
#59
давай попробуем
@davaipoprobuemm · 18,769
#60
Сначала крем, потом поем
@snachalakrem · 21,740
#61
Короче, слушай!
@koroche_slushay · 8,712
#62
Максимально наша
@maximalno_nasha · 25,803
#63
Чувствуй и размышляй | Валерия Кучерова
@feelandreflect · 1,470
#64
Сорокалетние подростки
@krupchat · 20,933
#65
Бабка-дворянка
@babka_dvoryanka · 10,252
#66
Стиль с акцентом
@vseprostyl · 523
#67
Закаленная стилем
@zakalennaya_stilem · 1,455
#68
ЗОЖ и кутеж
@fitness_binge · 126
#69
куры не клюют
@tamara_prosto · 1,373
#70
Навигатор стиля | Елена Мильман
@milenvibe · 1,032
#71
Беру не глядя
@beru_ne_glyadya · 1,852
#72
Женщина, которая строит | Лира Дюваль
@Museforamillion · 1,167
#73
Бутерброд и культпоход
@kultbuter · 1,895
#74
Виноваты гормоны
@gorm_sboy · 10,587
#75
Поперчить стилем
@poperchitstilem · 10,878
#76
Модная скумбрия
@fashion_skumbria · 12,108
#77
Культурный силуэт
@fashion_deciphered · 10,484
#78
в гостях у марики
@marika_pataki · 176
#79
Модный сарафан
@alenamorozowa · 757
#80
Пломбируйтесь
@plombiruites · 217
#81
Модная скряга
@fashionscrooge · 21,990
#82
Бескультурье
@unculterdland · 152
#83
Достань свой липстик
@and_kri · 83
#84
Визуальная манка
@storiesMKramer · 28,345
#85
Полетели? ✈️
@Polletelli · 2,017
#86
нателеграмил(а)
@vamvtg · 15,626
#87
Жизнь после 40
@zhizn_posle40 · 13,582
#88
Без принципов, но с сумкой
@kudriashovaa · 23,354
#89

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Умный Брокколь | Грамотность
@brokoledu · 43,033
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Я люблю русский язык
@rus_yaz_tg · 22,723
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Модная скряга
@fashionscrooge · 21,990
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Словарный жопас” (@nasty_notes), 21,809 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasty_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.