Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ALBINALAND

@albinalands

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,357subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002115947874
TypeChannel
Username@albinalands
DescriptionПространство для красивого ума Книги, искусство и визуальная культура Ведущая книжного клуба Для связи: Менеджер Инна @pr_albinaland
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/albinalands

Growth

7,3577,3707,363.56 August 2026 — 7,370 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,366 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,357 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,355–7,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:257,357-9
7 Aug 2026, 11:247,366-4
6 Aug 2026, 22:477,370first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.69%
avg views ÷ 7,357 subscribers
Avg views / post
566
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total13,577
Reactions total1,709
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,010
Videos
1,030
Links
507

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 51s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,709 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
72542.4%
🔥50729.7%
🕊20211.8%
🤣1689.83%
💯663.86%
281.64%
🙈130.761%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,709reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC85 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Давно не было видео-одевашек! Мне кажется, выбор мемов слишком очевидно выдает мой возраст… Дофаминовая сумка от Befree — пожалуйста, свяжитесь со мной!

🔥1511🤣8

12 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC328 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Почему женская жестокость в мифах никогда не рождается на пустом месте? ❗️Лиззи Тиффин ❗️Плохие девчонки Древней Греции Помните мою рубрику из книжных магазинов с обложками книг, которые я не куплю? Там была эта книга. Так вот, официально заявляю — я купила! Ну потому, что после «Цирцеи» тема античности никак не отпускала. И я вообще не пожалела! Эта книга — идеальная, легкая «перебивка» между чем-то сложным и сер

24🔥1812

11 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC592 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хочется, как в 19 веке: уехать на воды лечить нервы, читать романы принимая солнечные ванны, закрутить роман с отставным офицером, вечерами раскладывать пасьянс и есть спелые абрикосы, а не это всё...

52🤣32🔥24

11 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC577 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Немедленно. Возьмите. Мои. Деньги.

🔥4122💯20

11 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC572 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

На какую книгу делать обзор?

  1. Франсуаза Саган — Сигнал капитуляции8%
  2. Alison Espach — The Wedding People11%
  3. Лиззи Тиффин — Плохие девчонки Древней Греции32%
  4. Адриана Трижиани — Жена башмачника24%
  5. Анджело Лонгони — Принц Модильяни7%
  6. Гомер — Одиссея18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC532 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

За последние пару месяцев я прочитала немало книг, но отзывы на них написать так и не успела. Прошу понять, простить и не казнить! Но предлагаю компромисс: вы выбираете книгу, на которую я выпущу привычный текстовый отзыв, а на остальные запишу короткое видео-ревью. Как раз сейчас развиваю свой нельзяграм и ТикТок, так что буду обкатывать этот формат

34🔥23🕊17

10 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC580 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У меня есть пару книг, откуда вываливаются страницы… теперь считаю, что этот метод хозяйке на заметку!

38🔥23🕊17

10 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC656 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вчера газета Telegraph опубликовала список 50 величайших книг за всё время — звучит очень амбициозно, учитывая, что шедевров очевидно больше. Список получился очень англоцентричным. Что, впрочем, логично, учитывая происхождение издания Составлять топы — дело неблагодарное. По факту набросать перечень имен очень просто, но это всегда исключительно субъективная история. А вот выдержать потом напор недовольных, коих бу

32🤣20🙈13

9 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC657 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Оплата у психолога не прошла

🤣4036💯25

9 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC668 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пятые чтения в тишине официально состоялись! Несмотря на то, что по прогнозу сегодня было обещано солнце, дождь мы все-таки вызвали. В какой-то момент поднялся сильный ветер, капли забили в окна, мы все дружно переглянулись, посмеялись и с продолжили читать Искренне спасибо всем, кто пришел в наш кофейный домик и разделил это время со мной. Из забавного мне сегодня подарили кабачок. Это как в той известной шутке: е

41🔥31🕊16

9 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC630 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сходила с подругами в новый питерский ресторан Joli. Красивый, с идеальным светом и лаконичным дизайном Брала бедро с перцем рамиро — так уж вышло, что перец мне понравился больше курицы. И это не в минус, а скорее в плюс! Представьте, насколько вкусно приготовлено блюдо, если яркий и нежный вкус перца выиграл у птицы. Вообще всё, что было на нашем столе, включая комплиментарный хлеб, было прям хорошо. Всё, кроме во

32🔥23🕊14

8 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC489 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Нежное напоминание — завтра в 13:00 буду всех ждать в кофейне Цензура Ин1:1 на нашу Silence Reading Party! Из важно: взять свою книгу и прийти на 15 минут пораньше. Адрес и все детали тут P.S. Наконец-то дождались и не будет дождя. Сможем читать как внутри кофейного домика, так и снаружи!

16🔥14🕊14

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @albinalands. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTCAnonymous Poll190 voters

На какую книгу делать обзор?

  1. Франсуаза Саган — Сигнал капитуляции8%
  2. Alison Espach — The Wedding People11%
  3. Лиззи Тиффин — Плохие девчонки Древней Греции32%
  4. Адриана Трижиани — Жена башмачника24%
  5. Анджело Лонгони — Принц Модильяни7%
  6. Гомер — Одиссея18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 84,692 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ALBINALAND” (@albinalands), 7,357 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/albinalands.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.