Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Натянуто за уши

Channel

Натянуто за уши

@dr_amisurgery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,084subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002139170931
TypeChannel
Username@dr_amisurgery
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_amisurgery

Growth

3,0843,0993,091.56 August 2026 — 3,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,093 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,089 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,084 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,082–3,101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:243,084-5
12 Aug 2026, 21:063,089-4
9 Aug 2026, 22:113,093-6
6 Aug 2026, 11:023,099no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:023,099first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,168 reactions across 13 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣42736.6%
😁23920.5%
19516.7%
🥴584.97%
🤪574.88%
🔥383.25%
🥰262.23%
👏211.80%
🙈211.80%
👍181.54%
😱181.54%
🤔121.03%
🙏110.942%
🌚60.514%
👀60.514%
😡40.342%
❤‍🔥30.257%
🤯30.257%
🗿20.171%
😐20.171%
1 further kind10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 06:19 UTC895 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

— Алло, не могу говорить, я на обучении. — … — Но ты же сама позвонила. — Все, пока! Мама на бизике!

🥰2623🔥11😁9

10 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,890 views147 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скелет кавказца А теперь, когда я привлекла ваше внимание, перейдем к насущному. За прошлый год я как-то незаметно собрала небольшую коллекцию. Два защемления шеи. Четыре подворота одного и того же левого голеностопа. Причём не настолько серьёзные, чтобы отменять работу. Но достаточно мерзкие, чтобы ползти к пациентам с походкой хромой скотины. Приходилось ездить в травмпункты. Каждый раз в разные. Во-первых, та

🤣102😁2817

7 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,770 views113 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Памятка по эксплуатации новых имплантов Чтобы новая грудь радовала, а не становилась поводом для паники, соблюдаем простые правила. Первый месяц: 💗спим только на спине; 💗не поднимаем руки выше уровня плеч; ⭐️не носим больше 2,5–3 кг; 💚не занимаемся активным спортом; 💗честно носим компрессионное бельё. Почему именно месяц? Именно в это время организм формирует капсулу вокруг импланта. Кажется слишком просто? Тог

🤣81😱1814

6 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,580 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Сюр достойный понедельника

🤣49🙈18😁8🤯31

30 Jun 2026, 06:55 UTC≈2,180 views115 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Простите

🤣86😁18🤪9😡2

10 Jun 2026, 05:38 UTC≈2,660 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

С любовью, Ваш хирург 💙

😁6023🌚6😡1

9 Jun 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,360 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

О верхней границе возраста Дядя Филя напомнил мне важную тему, которую обсуждали на прошлогоднем Балтийском конгрессе. Ваш хирург везде поспел: и на мастер-классы по подтяжкам лица, и лекции послушать успел! Разбирали примеры пациентов, которые делали первые подтяжки в возрасте 75+. Что важно помнить: 💗Отек у таких пациентов будет сходить дольше из-за особенностей микроциркуляции и уменьшения лимфодренажной функ

55👍18🔥12🙏2

8 Jun 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,740 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все уже успели обсудить новый нос Филиппа Бедросовича, а мы еще нет. Непорядок. Операция явно свежая, помимо очевидной ринопластики также видно шов от булхорна. Как хирургу мне интересно, стали ли оперировать нос из того же доступа. Обывателям другое: останется нос таким же через год или все-таки надежда есть? Как думаете?

🥴48🤔12🤪9👀61

7 Jun 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,780 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть у меня одна отвратительная профессиональная привычка. Некоторые хирурги отпускают операцию после того, как сняли перчатки. Я — нет. Я могу неделями ходить и мысленно докапываться до результатов, которые никто, кроме меня, даже проблемой не считает. Вот правда. Пациент счастлив. Коллеги говорят, что всё отлично. Реабилитация идёт по плану. А я смотрю на отёк и думаю: — Ну, падла, чего стоим? Нельзя быстрее??

🤣5629😁14

2 Jun 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,780 views101 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вчерашняя пациентка перед операцией выложила сторис: — Иду на операцию. Очень боюсь. Без уточнений. Без контекста. Просто ушла под наркоз и оставила подписчиков седеть. А через полчаса после пробуждения появилась новая сторис: — Я жива. Выкусите. И это, девочки и мальчики, уровень драматичности к которому я стремлюсь!

😁7014🥴10🔥4😐2👻1

1 Jun 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,910 views111 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ботокс Голливуд и губы Мерседес остались в прошлом! Встречаем нового покемона:

🤣53🤪39😁14🙈3🗿2

31 May 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,810 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Alicefox (@alicefox25) 2. Дарья Раевская✨ Дизайн ✨ (@Damodaralila167) 3. А (@remolif) ✔️Проверить результаты

👏21🔥114❤‍🔥3😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dr_amisurgery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 906,348 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Натянуто за уши” (@dr_amisurgery), 3,084 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_amisurgery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.