Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ToON News

Channel

ToON News

@toonorgnews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

86,258subscribers

-1,043 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002021897095
TypeChannel
Username@toonorgnews
Description✨ Welcome to the ToON News channel ToON App: @toonorgbot ToON Chat: @toonorgchat ToON Support: @toon_support X (Twitter): x.com/toonorgbot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/toonorgnews

Growth

86,25887,30186,779.56 August 2026 — 87,301 subscribers6 August 2026 — 87,301 subscribers6 August 2026 — 87,232 subscribers7 August 2026 — 87,116 subscribers8 August 2026 — 87,000 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 86,798 subscribers11 August 2026 — 86,665 subscribers12 August 2026 — 86,542 subscribers14 August 2026 — 86,396 subscribers15 August 2026 — 86,258 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1,043. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86,102–87,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:1886,258-138
14 Aug 2026, 07:4786,396-146
12 Aug 2026, 21:5986,542-123
11 Aug 2026, 18:3786,665-133
10 Aug 2026, 19:2386,798-104
9 Aug 2026, 18:1286,902-98
8 Aug 2026, 15:2587,000-116
7 Aug 2026, 13:5087,116-116
6 Aug 2026, 12:2187,232-69
6 Aug 2026, 01:3487,301no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4887,301first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.97%
avg views ÷ 86,258 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,700
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held20 (19 April 202619 July 2026)
Views total1,700
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
197
Videos
24
Links
192

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

738 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22230.1%
🔥20728.0%
👍8511.5%
🎉557.45%
🤩476.37%
😍395.28%
👏202.71%
🥰172.30%
👀121.63%
🤝121.63%
🆒70.949%
🌚60.813%
40.542%
🦄30.407%
🤪20.271%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 738reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @toonorgnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,700 views67 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Veronica from ToON Novels’ story "For All Your Money" is at the 2026 World Cup Final ⚽️🏆 Who will you be supporting today? 😈 ❤️ — Argentina 🔥 — Spain

35🔥31🎉1

12 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,280 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Happy weekend, ToONsters! 💛 The poll results don't show a clear community choice yet, so please vote if you haven't already — we need to decide on the theme for the next Style Contest 😎

23🎉10👍8🤝2

9 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈2,760 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Something new in ToON: stories that talk back! 💫 As an expansion of the ToON ecosystem, we're happy to present ToON Novels, a gaming division focused on developing visual novels that combine interactive storytelling, great visuals, and the power of AI 🔥 Meet "For All Your Money", our first neo-noir story about a con artist Veronica who lives off deceiving wealthy men. Until the game turns dangerous. You make her ch

👍21🔥106😍4🥰2

8 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,240 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

WHAT STYLE CONTEST SHOULD BE NEXT? 🤩

  1. SUMMER VIBES 🏝54%
  2. CRINGE & FAILED STYLES 🤪24%
  3. PET FRIENDS 🐶47%
  4. Something else — tell us in the comments! 😎22%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥18🤩5🦄3🆒3

6 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC≈3,390 views71 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

CONTEST WINNERS ANNOUNCED! 🎉 The Cartoon Styles Contest with a MIND-BLOWING NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS is officially over, and we’re excited to announce and REWARD the WINNERS 🤩 Guys, this is literally our BIGGEST record in recent times! We received MORE THAN 800 SUBMISSIONS from 270 AUTHORS in just 3 weeks of the contest! 🔥 That’s why we decided to INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PRIZE SPOTS FROM 5 TO 13 🤌 But even with that,

🎉4116🤩7🆒4😍3

1 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC≈3,130 views34 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

The contest has ended. Thanks everyone who participated! ✨ Now, we need to choose the winners, and it’s not going to be an easy task — there were more than 800 submissions 🔥 Expect the results in the coming days 🎉

14🔥9🤝8🎉3

20 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC≈3,770 views18 reactionsread 16 August 2026

THE CONTEST HAS BEEN EXTENDED AT OUR COMMUNITY’S REQUEST 🔥 1 MORE WEEK. 3 MORE PRIZES! 🎉 Deadline: June 28, 23:59 UTC Results: after July 3 🤩 Need TP to participate? DM @toon_support! Want to know more about the contest? Check THIS out! 👈🏻

🔥9🤩5🥰31

19 Jun 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,290 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Our friends at Romansi are giving everyone a chance to become a character of their visual novels 🤩 Romansi is a new mobile app with visual novels, featuring no in-game currency and no ads at all. Every choice is completely FREE for players ✨ The release of Romansi is planned for this summer, but while we’re waiting, the app’s developers are giving everyone a chance to become characters in their stories! To partici

🔥754👀3🤩2

15 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,830 views32 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

It’s been just one week since we announced the Cartoon Style Contest, and you’ve already sent us more than 500 amazing Cartoon Styles! 🎨 The creativity is honestly insane. Thank you to everyone who has joined so far 💜 Quick reminder if you haven’t participated yet: 🏆 5 prize spots, $10 USDT each ⚡️ Need TP to generate Styles? Request it from @toon_support 💬 Send your works here in the chat ✅ Turn on the contest par

17🔥9🤩6

8 Jun 2026, 13:33 UTC≈3,000 views37 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

A new contest is here, and this one is all about cartoons! 🎨 Create your best Cartoon Style the way you imagine it: a nod to your favorite toon series, a childhood fairy tale, a famous painting reimagined in cartoon form — anything goes! 🌈 🏆 This time we have 5 winners, each getting $10 USDT. More chances to win for everyone! 😎 Here’s how to participate: → Open @toonorgbot → Create a cartoon-themed Style → Optiona

🔥1910😍5🤩3

1 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,970 views33 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Next contest starts soon 😎 If you need TP to participate, feel free to DM @toon_support 👈🏻

🔥177🤩5🤪2😍2

22 May 2026, 05:27 UTC≈4,810 views32 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Poll

WHAT CONTEST SHOULD WE RUN NEXT? 👀

  1. BEST CARTOON STYLE 🧚‍♀️47%
  2. BEST ANIMAL STYLE 🦊33%
  3. BEST HORROR STYLE 🧟‍♂️32%
  4. CRINGIEST STYLE EVER 🤪23%
  5. SOMETHING ELSE, I WILL WRITE IN THE COMMENTS 💬24%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍18🔥95

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @toonorgnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll92 voters

WHAT STYLE CONTEST SHOULD BE NEXT? 🤩

  1. SUMMER VIBES 🏝54%
  2. CRINGE & FAILED STYLES 🤪24%
  3. PET FRIENDS 🐶47%
  4. Something else — tell us in the comments! 😎22%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 May 2026, 05:27 UTCAnonymous Poll113 voters

WHAT CONTEST SHOULD WE RUN NEXT? 👀

  1. BEST CARTOON STYLE 🧚‍♀️47%
  2. BEST ANIMAL STYLE 🦊33%
  3. BEST HORROR STYLE 🧟‍♂️32%
  4. CRINGIEST STYLE EVER 🤪23%
  5. SOMETHING ELSE, I WILL WRITE IN THE COMMENTS 💬24%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Apr 2026, 19:05 UTCAnonymous Poll98 voters

🎁 WHAT CONTEST SHOULD WE HOST NEXT? 👀

  1. 🤪 THE WEIRDEST STYLES — when AI generation's gone completely wrong42%
  2. 📸 THE MOST FASHIONABLE STYLES — the ones worthy of being published in the most iconic magazines41%
  3. 👾 VIRAL MEME REPRESENTATIONS — the best Styles based on the funniest viral memes worldwide47%
  4. 👀 YOUR OWN THEME — let us know in the comments!31%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 355,720 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ToON News” (@toonorgnews), 86,258 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toonorgnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.