Channel
@bluechipcoins
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
106,515subscribers
-292 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002123201906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bluechipcoins |
| Description | Provide analysis and advice on potential coins and the development of the crypto market. For Marketing: @bigwhalecrypto1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bluechipcoins |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 106,515 | -135 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 106,650 | -151 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 106,801 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 106,807 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
253 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 116 | 45.8% | |
| ❤ | 85 | 33.6% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 4.35% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 4.35% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 3.56% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 3.56% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.98% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.58% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2024 to 22 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔼 Ethereum NFT Collections Drive Weekly Sales to $304 Million Sales of Ethereum-based NFTs surged to $304 million this week, driven by standout collections like Pudgy Penguins and Azuki, marking a 76% increase compared to the previous week.
👍52❤40🔥10👎5👏4🤔3
💸 Today, ETH ETFs saw a net outflow of $75 million: 🟢 A significant ETH sell-off occurred, with more than $100 million worth of ETH offloaded. 🟢 Other funds, meanwhile, bought ETH, albeit modestly, with inflows totaling only a few tens of millions of USD
❤18👍15👎6👏4🤔3😁2
💵 Today, BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of $277 million: 🟢 BlackRock sold $72 million worth of BTC. 🟢 Other funds also reduced their BTC holdings, led by ARKB with $87 million in sales. 🟢 Total BTC sales by funds today reached nearly $290 million.
👍6🤔3❤1👏1
🔼 According to CryptoQuant, Bitcoin demand is surging. 🟢 OTC exchanges are experiencing the largest monthly inventory decline in 2024, with a reduction of 26K BTC. Total reserves have dropped by 40K BTC since November 20, indicating a significant increase in market momentum.
🍾3👍3❤2
The Bitcoin Dominance (BTC.D) on the 1W timeframe suggests that altcoins might not have to endure prolonged stagnation anymore. A retest of the bottom (or near the bottom) from December 20th is likely the scenario.
👍4❤3😁2
🔒 Token Unlocks this week are worth over $843 million USD 🟢 Large unlocks over $5 million this week include $ARB, $MRS, $ID, $APE, etc. 🟢 Linear unlocks this week include $WLD, $SOL, $TIA, $DOGE, etc.
👍11❤7
MicroStrategy has made a profit of over $20 billion from the total $BTC it holds 😁 This season truly seems like an uptrend for Bitcoin to rally.
❤1👍1
BTC has confirmed an uptrend. The short-term target is 114K - 115K.
😁1
The Bitcoin Dominance (BTC.D) rate continues to rise. As BTC’s price also increases alongside the dominance rate, altcoins are not suffering too much, but they face challenges in gaining momentum. If BTC.D reverses downward at the 58.17% zone, altcoins will have a chance. However, if it breaks above this level, altcoins will face significant pressure.
❤2
MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Purchases for the 6th Consecutive Week: • Nov 11: 27,200 BTC (~$2.03B) at an average price of ~$74,463/BTC • Nov 18: 51,780 BTC (~$4.6B) at an average price of ~$88,627/BTC • Nov 25: 55,500 BTC (~$5.4B) at an average price of ~$97,862/BTC • Dec 2: 15,400 BTC (~$1.5B) at an average price of ~$95,976/BTC • Dec 9: 21,550 BTC (~$2.1B) at an average price of ~$98,783/BTC • Dec 16: 15,350 BTC …
❤4👍2
Is Bitcoin about to break its ATH? 😁
❤1👍1
⏸ On-chain Report - Glassnode W50 🟢 To date, miners have earned a total of $71.49 billion, highlighting the network’s strong security and robust economic incentives. 🟢 The network has processed a total of 1.12 billion transactions and settled $131.25 trillion in transfer volume. Entity-adjusted metrics provide a clearer view of real economic activities. ➡️ Read the full report for more details: Glassnode W50
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bluechipcoins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coin Insider” (@bluechipcoins), 106,515 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bluechipcoins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.