Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Time of Transition (Bernhard Guenther & Laura Matsue)

@timeoftransition

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,779subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299657682
TypeChannel
Username@timeoftransition
Created8 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/timeoftransition

Growth

10,77910,80510,7926 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,804 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,805 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,799 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,796 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,791 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,787 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,788 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 8 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,775–10,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:1410,779-5
13 Aug 2026, 07:3610,784-4
12 Aug 2026, 10:3310,788+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:4810,787-4
10 Aug 2026, 11:5410,791-5
9 Aug 2026, 10:0110,796-3
8 Aug 2026, 10:2110,799-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:4810,805+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:2410,804-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:1510,805no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5110,805first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.27%
avg views ÷ 10,779 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (15 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total21,992
Reactions total463
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

489 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35773.0%
🔥7214.7%
👍255.11%
🙏255.11%
👏71.43%
🤔10.204%
🤯10.204%
🥰10.204%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 489reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC378 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“August ​contains ​two ​very ​different ​eclipse ​stories. First, we have ​this ​south ​node ​solar ​eclipse ​in ​Leo. ​This ​is ​about the release ​of ​an ​old ​identity, ​an ​old ​way ​of ​seeking ​validation, ​an ​old ​role, ​maybe ​an ​old ​way ​you ​learned ​to ​dim ​yourself, ​or ​a ​way ​that ​you ​feel ​like ​you’re ​still ​needing ​attention ​or ​approval ​to ​feel ​safe ​expressing ​who ​you ​actually ​are.

12🔥2🙏1

Signed Angela D

11 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC589 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“You ​will ​feel ​the ​eclipse ​energy ​right ​now. ​This is not just a single-day event; it’s ​a ​whole season we are in. ​One ​of ​the ​primary ​themes ​of ​eclipses ​is ​they ​tend ​to ​bring ​radical ​and ​irrevocable ​change. ​They ​don’t ​just ​ease ​you ​into ​the ​changes ​they ​bring ​into ​your ​life; instead, ​it ​feels ​like ​the ​rug ​has ​been ​pulled ​out ​from ​underneath ​you. They tend to be turnin

19🔥6

Signed Angela D

10 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC695 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026

August 2026 brings a powerful eclipse season, with a total solar eclipse in Leo on August 12 followed by a lunar eclipse in Pisces on August 27/28. Eclipses have long been associated with accelerated change, major beginnings and endings, unexpected developments, revelations, and turning points that can alter the direction of our lives. What makes this month especially interesting is that two larger eclipse events a

9🙏1

Signed Bernhard Guenther

7 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,290 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“A shame-based personality is always monitoring itself, continuously asking, “Am I good enough? Am I too much? Do they approve of me?” So many people do this all the time. Life becomes less about authentic expression and more about impression management, which destroys spontaneity. One of John Bradshaw’s central insights is that toxic shame destroys spontaneity completely because the playful, curious, creative child

13👍4🔥2

Signed Angela D

5 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC≈1,110 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“After World War II, Jung said that the greatest danger facing humanity was not the atom bomb; it was human beings’ inability to recognize their own shadow, and that a nation convinced of its own righteousness is unable to see its own darkness and will always try to find somewhere to put it. They’ll find a group, a leader, an ideology, and an enemy out there to pursue with the full force of everything they refuse to

17🔥6🙏2👍1

Signed Angela D

4 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,050 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“One of the biggest realizations I've had to face and accept is that not everyone is "ready" to wake up, nor will there be a collective awakening anytime soon, for there are vastly different levels of being and soul potential among 8+ billion people on this planet and that there is also nothing wrong with it in light of the evolution of consciousness. We are all one, but we're not all the same. As the esoteric axiom

17🔥5

Signed Angela D

3 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC874 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“The idea that your thoughts completely create your reality is based on the false premise that your conscious waking mind is in itself the master of the universe. While our thoughts do affect how we perceive reality and those perceptions shape our actions, there is a deeper guiding intelligence to life that goes beyond the mind alone. There are things that you did not think of that will happen, and there are many c

22🔥5🙏5

Signed Angela D

31 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,110 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

What we are living through is not merely another political, social, or economic crisis, but the end of an age and a profound spiritual transition. New video: The Time of Transition - The End of an Age and the Birth of a New Humanity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxn8tuhN_uE This is the first installment in a new series of audiovisual narrated essays for those who prefer listening rather than reading. In this p

23

Signed Bernhard Guenther

31 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,130 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“We need to differentiate between guilt and shame. Healthy guilt says, I did something wrong, my behavior violated my values; I need to make amends. But toxic shame says, I am wrong, or there’s something fundamentally wrong with me because I made a mistake. The person becomes shame-based, and then they organize their entire personality around hiding this imagined defect. Shame then becomes the core identity of the p

15🔥2👍1🤯1

Signed Angela D

30 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC976 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“When people age, and their hearts have closed and hardened from the decades of suppressed emotions in their bodies, their shadows will become denser, uglier, and more hostile with time. Their unhealed pain is like a black cloud that follows them silently, that they’re waiting to offload onto anyone they meet who triggers them. When people age and do so with grace and an open heart, you can see in their eyes a ligh

26🔥3

Signed Angela D

29 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC903 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“The ​False ​Self ​is ​not ​who ​you ​truly ​are, ​it ​is ​the ​personality ​that ​you ​unconsciously ​constructed ​as ​a ​survival ​strategy. If ​you want to use Jung’s language, ​we can compare the False Self to what he calls the Persona, ​which ​is ​the ​social ​mask ​worn ​by ​the ​ego, ​the ​little “​I” ​as it relates to the outside world. Having ​a ​Persona ​or ​a ​mask ​is ​not ​the ​problem; every ​healthy

13👍2

Signed Angela D

28 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC844 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

“If we have unresolved trauma or a major shadow part we haven't looked at and integrated, it has a lot of pull and energy. It's full of emotion and very instinctual and impulsive, with a lot of control over us. ​There is a psychic gravity to it. Since it has so much energy, gravity, and psychic draw, we subconsciously identify with those parts and don't even realize it. We become identified with the trauma and live

17👍2🔥2🙏2

Signed Angela D

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @timeoftransition. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 156,535 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Time of Transition (Bernhard Guenther & Laura Matsue)” (@timeoftransition), 10,779 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timeoftransition.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.