and vote in x https://x.com/thekuchh/status/2086391218297352218

Channel
Kuch (vibecoding arc)
@thekuchh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,089subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001983059407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thekuchh |
| Created | 12 June 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thekuchh |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 4,089 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 4,097 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 4,105 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 4,114 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 4,114 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 12 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.74%
- avg views ÷ 4,089 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 194
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.95%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (12 June 2023 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 776 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 42.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2023 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
what do you usually use ai for?
- content / social29%
- code / dev48%
- design0%
- business ops24%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
before i call anything an "agent" it has to clear 5 checks: 1. equipment: real tools, with descriptions and skills that tell it how to use them 2. a loop: it can act, observe, and repeat without me in the middle 3. access: read-only or read/write, decided on purpose, not by accident 4. context: it lives in the file system, not the chat window 5. a stuck path: something actually happens when the loop breaks miss one…
👍4⚡1
there is a Tier 1 agency, kottolle, currently actively recruiting creators 🔗 https://creator.doomers.ai/join?ref=THEKUC813 1. sign up 2. enter your bids for posts 3. apply for campaigns 4. post 5. receive payment p.s. currently 4 companies are expected for August
🔥4
if i was to help you with one specific problem, which solution sounds the most suitable to you?
- how to use AI to maker your product & get your first 10 customers61%
- how to scale your app to 6-figures with AI marketing45%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👀1
FULL CONFIGURATION AND DETAILED SETUP: HOW TO SET UP OPENCLAW FOR $0 (INSTEAD OF $100–$200): LAYER 1: LOCAL MODEL (FREE, ALWAYS ON) > runs on your machine via ollama > no api, no limits, zero costs > handles reading, summaries, basic coding > covers ~70% of real usage install Ollama curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh pull model # best option ollama pull qwen3.5:27b # mid hardware ollama pull qwen3.5:3…
❤🔥5👍4
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @thekuchh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
what do you usually use ai for?
- content / social29%
- code / dev48%
- design0%
- business ops24%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
if i was to help you with one specific problem, which solution sounds the most suitable to you?
- how to use AI to maker your product & get your first 10 customers61%
- how to scale your app to 6-figures with AI marketing45%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2023 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rektfencer_threads · 78,780
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@CryptoNobler · 51,054
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kuch (vibecoding arc)” (@thekuchh), 4,089 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thekuchh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.