Channel
@start_threads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,324subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001911889638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @start_threads |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/start_threads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 8,324 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 8,334 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 8,347 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 8,361 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 8,362 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 8,362 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 84.4% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2025 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Most people stay broke forever. Not because they are stupid. But because they never learn how money actually works. Read this if you refuse to live on repeat 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1998038275492327733?s=20
❤5
🚨 The next Fed Chair could be the most crypto-friendly power player in US history Trump wants Paul Atkins to run the Federal Reserve. This one move could change how money works in America. Here’s why everyone in crypto should pay attention 👇🧵 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1996619187641577701?s=20
❤1
Crypto is the only market bleeding in 2025 Stocks climbing to new highs Gold smashing records Everyone is scared but nobody understands why 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1995892020074975614?s=20
❤1
Everyone is confused why the market dumped so hard. Everyone thinks BlackRock is the villain behind the crash. But their real plan is way bigger than a simple sell-off. Read this if you want to understand what happens next for $BTC 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1995583031361593648?s=20
❤1
Everyone thinks crypto is dying again. But the chart is screaming the opposite. This is not the end of the bull run. It is the setup for the real one 👇🧵 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1994421085367071162?s=20
❤2
The charts look boring until they don’t One green candle and everything changes This is the last quiet moment of the cycle Here’s how I’m positioning before the fireworks 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1994109219822555411
❤1
Everyone sees fear on the charts right now But the smartest money sees a beginning Altcoins just flashed a signal that only shows up before the big runs If you miss this window you miss the entire cycle🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1993747247667007710?s=20
October 10 wasn’t a normal crash. Something much bigger snapped. Twenty billion vanished in seconds, and the real reason stayed hidden. Here’s what actually triggered the drop and why the market still can’t recover 👇🧵 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1993421545570762820?s=20
❤2
Most people lose money not because of the dip itself but because they buy it the wrong way every single time. Fear makes them act blindly while smart money builds positions. If you do not want to fall into the same trap again, read this 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1993045694391943362?s=20
❤1
Everyone thinks crypto is collapsing again but this is just the market clearing the table smart money is quietly loading up while retail panics here’s how I buy dips instead of fear them 👇🧵 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1992299912705499605?s=20
❤1🐳1
Nobody’s paying attention right now. But the same setup appeared before every major altseason in the last two cycles. Fear is peaking, liquidity is shifting, lowcaps are loading. Read this before the breakout starts 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1991981888517656764?s=20
🐳2❤1
Everyone thinks the market is dead again. But altcoins are quietly winding up for a huge move. I spent days going through charts and flows. The breakout starts now, not later. 🧵👇 https://x.com/0xStartt/status/1991531106169168378?s=20
❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @start_threads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,028,649 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JetStart Alpha ✈️” (@start_threads), 8,324 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/start_threads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.