Channel
@Discover_0x
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,461subscribers
-654 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002143672781 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Discover_0x |
| Created | Between 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Discover_0x |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 13,461 | -44 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 13,505 | -145 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 13,650 | -23 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 13,673 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 13,697 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 13,712 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 13,725 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 13,751 | -40 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 13,791 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:48 | 13,815 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 13,833 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 13,844 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 13,851 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 13,860 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 13,871 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 13,879 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 13,889 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 13,899 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 13,915 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 13,935 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 54.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 21.2% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 21.2% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
THERE IS ZERO CHANCE BITCOIN HITS $100K THIS YEAR People are buying $BTC at $78K expecting six figures. I think they’re about to get destroyed. Every major Bitcoin bear market has followed the same script: → 350+ days of pain → 350D MA gets tested before the real bottom → Every rally before that becomes exit liquidity → The final flush goes deeper than almost everyone expects And right now there’s one massive p…
BITCOIN IS ABOUT TO REPEAT THE SAME BRUTAL TRAP FOR THE 4TH TIME At this point, the pattern is getting ridiculous. Lower high → rejection → breakdown → new low. It happened once. Then again. Then a third time. And now $BTC is walking straight into the same setup for the FOURTH time. The level that matters: $78K–$80K. If Bitcoin pushes into that zone and gets rejected, this is my roadmap: $80K → $70K → $63K…
❤1
🚨 GOLD JUST FIRED A WARNING THAT COULD BREAK THIS ENTIRE MARKET Forget the gold dump. What it may be signaling next is far more dangerous. I warned about the gold selloff before it happened. Now the setup behind it is starting to spread into the one place nobody wants to question: AI stocks. The chain is brutal: War → Oil → Inflation → Higher yields → Gold gets crushed → Cost of capital stays high → AI valuatio…
BITCOIN’S $80K BREAKOUT IS STARTING TO LOOK LIKE A MASSIVE TRAP Everyone is buying $BTC like the correction is over. I’m watching the exact opposite. The structure is starting to look like a textbook advance → distribution → decline setup. And that $78K–$80K push? It looks more like the final bull trap than the start of a new bull run. My base case: $80K → $64K → $52K–$55K → READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discove…
BITCOIN’S REAL CRASH HASN’T EVEN STARTED YET Everyone celebrating this bounce is about to get trapped. If Bitcoin closes the month below $83K, the bearish structure stays intact. And the next move is the one nobody wants to hear: $83K → $72K → $64K → $54K READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2093805111059665396
🔥1
BITCOIN’S NEXT MOVE COULD MAKE THIS ENTIRE CYCLE LOOK SMALL Everyone is obsessing over the next $5K move. I’m looking at where Bitcoin could be 3 years from now. If the 4-year cycle repeats, the roadmap is brutal: → October 2026: cycle bottom below $50K → 2029: cycle peak around $200K–$210K Buy here and that’s roughly 2.5x–2.6x. READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2093413587964330265
❤2
$SPCX COULD BE ABOUT TO DESTROY EVERYONE WHO BOUGHT THE HYPE $SPCX is already down 50% from its ATH. More shares are hitting the market, early buyers are getting crushed, and the worst part is most people still have no idea what they’re looking at. I’ve seen this movie before. Look at $TSLA: → IPO at $17 in June 2010 → Ripped to ~$35 within months → Then crashed 40%+ READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/20…
BITCOIN IS REPEATING THE SAME TRAP THAT WIPED OUT TRADERS IN 2022 And almost nobody sees what comes next. 2022: Top 1 → correction → Top 2 → 120-day range → bull trap → dump → manipulation → accumulation. 2026: Top 1 → correction → Top 2 → 120-day range → bull trap → dump → manipulation → accumulation. READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2092633436083118313
🚨 WARNING: BITCOIN’S FINAL BULL TRAP MAY HAVE JUST SNAPPED SHUT Everyone celebrating this pump might be about to learn the hard way. Bitcoin slammed into $80K and failed to break through. If that rejection holds, the relief rally is done - and the next leg could get brutal. My roadmap hasn’t changed: $80K → $65K → $57K → READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2092315505822429301
👍1
🚨 BITCOIN JUST FLASHED A MASSIVE WARNING Everyone is celebrating the bounce. I think they’re about to get trapped. BTC failed to break $80K, and the final relief rally before the next major leg down may already be over. So far, the market is following my roadmap almost perfectly. Here’s what I’m watching next: $80K → $65K → $57K → READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2092177221729366362
🔥1
$BTC IS ABOUT TO DO IT FOR THE 4TH TIME This chart is almost too obvious now. Lower High → Breakdown → New Low. It happened once. Then twice. Then a third time. And now Bitcoin is building the EXACT SAME SETUP AGAIN. $78K–$80K is the zone I’m watching. If BTC gets rejected there, the roadmap is brutal: $80K → $70K → $63K → $56K READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2091941147270631551
❤2
SILVER BUYERS ARE ABOUT TO GET SLAUGHTERED AGAIN. Everyone keeps calling the bottom. They’ve been wrong every single time. February: $118 → “BREAKOUT” May: $89 → “THE BOTTOM” Now: $70 → “BUY THE DIP” Three pumps. Three lower highs. Three traps. This isn’t strength. It’s distribution. READ🫣⬇️ https://x.com/0x_Discover/status/2091625097391943895
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @Discover_0x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0x_Discover” (@Discover_0x), 13,461 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Discover_0x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.