Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FarmercistJournal

Channel

FarmercistJournal

@farmercistjournal0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,470subscribers

-125 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001995645465
TypeChannel
Username@farmercistjournal0
DescriptionAnyone that DMs you from here is trying to scam you… I don’t help trade, double money or chat you in DMs/ for collaborations confirm thru 𝕏 Farmercist’s alpha channel 𝕏: https://farmercist Blog: coming soon Collaborations: reach out on X
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/farmercistjournal0

Growth

41,47041,59541,532.57 August 2026 — 41,595 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,592 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,565 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,548 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,539 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,548 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,546 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,516 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41,490 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,470 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -125. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,451–41,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 22:0741,470-20
15 Aug 2026, 15:5341,490-26
14 Aug 2026, 03:2841,516-30
12 Aug 2026, 21:5541,546-2
11 Aug 2026, 23:5241,548+9
10 Aug 2026, 20:3541,539-9
9 Aug 2026, 17:0241,548-17
8 Aug 2026, 14:2341,565-27
7 Aug 2026, 13:3041,592-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:1541,595first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.06%
avg views ÷ 41,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,930
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held37 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total108,260
Reactions total1,234
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,120
Videos
356
Links
1,590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
2m 25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,234 reactions across 37 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
81165.7%
🔥977.86%
👍846.81%
🤣645.19%
👏524.21%
😱403.24%
😁362.92%
💔282.27%
80.648%
🫡60.486%
🏆40.324%
🥰20.162%
🌚10.081%
🍌10.081%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 37 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @farmercistjournal0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,390 views42 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

What a week… CYS risky all in short 🚀🦅 Looking to long at 1.2 again lol

42

Signed Farmercist Michael

11 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC≈3,110 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

proof that i deserve every single bit of the good things that happen to me 7 days consecutive interaction... to those keeping up, make sure to get your discord roles too

52👏2

Signed Farmercist 👨‍🌾 🦴

11 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC≈3,010 views34 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

You can’t follow Farmercist and not get rich as fuck ✌️ Dropped 4 trade and pixel 4 is up and pixel still consolidating… 4/usd winner https://x.com/farmercist/status/2087289681905844675

22👍8🏆4

Signed Farmercist Michael

11 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈2,960 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

I changed the meta from train your robot to earn into skit to earn 🤣 What can’t Farmercist do https://x.com/farmercist/status/2087253026193203285 Now more than ever, I’m convinced that we are going to make it out of this trenches. Put all my energy into this. Watch and interact.

15

Signed Farmercist Michael

11 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,680 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Pixel is on the move 🫡…

17

Signed Farmercist Michael

11 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC≈2,460 views18 reactionsread 17 August 2026

4 trade activated at 0.0103 and it’s up at 0.0108 now 🦅🫶 Pixel activated too but showing signs of weakness Showing..,

18

Signed Farmercist Michael

10 Aug 2026, 22:11 UTC≈2,630 views31 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

GRVT approaching our 0.25 buy entry 🤭🤭🤭 We just need another -21% from current price

24😁7

Signed Farmercist Michael

10 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈3,030 views32 reactionsread 17 August 2026

I just set a new long at 0.34 againnnnnnnnn 😂 We perish on this… or we make life changing money

32

Signed Farmercist Michael

10 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈2,980 views39 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Got in again, milked another $2900 When you see a crime, make sure you partake 🫶 2900+1600=4,500 today

286😁3👍2

Signed Farmercist Michael

10 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,770 views36 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🙏🙏🙏 Winnnnn on this one

🔥305👍1

Signed Farmercist Michael

10 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,800 views35 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

i am so sad... extremely sad

😱22💔6🫡61

Signed Farmercist 👨‍🌾 🦴

10 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,720 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Funny how on TGE some will say it’s because he is an influencer 😗 Look below and you’ll see that I’m 4 pages in, soon 10 pages and so forth Regardless the truth will reveal itself soon… keep working chat 🚀

37

Signed Farmercist Michael

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @farmercistjournal0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 584,431 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Crypto With Shola
@cryptowithshola · 108,013
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Instablog9ja
@Instablog9jaofficial · 394,362
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 11 August 2026
Mr Bayo Space
@mrbayospace · 97,119
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Mr Banks Free Channel
@MrBanksFreeChannel · 442,654
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
XM Trading Academy
@ahmedfreesignals · 302,567
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
FirePips Forex Academy (Jeffforex)
@firepipsignals · 233,714
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
High Stakers Lounge
@AAAAAFAiLCAXY7KeFnyei · 181,752
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
BOOKIES NIGHTMARE 😱
@Ekiti1 · 199,753
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
THISSDAX KITCHEN👨‍🍳
@thedaxbrand · 95,970
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
BIG LOUIE 🧏🏾‍♂️💯
@biglouie13 · 96,374
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
THE FLASH ⚡⚽️🏀
@the_flash101 · 182,277
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
HABBY fOREX ACAdEMy
@habbyforex · 301,800
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
KOJOFOREX
@kojoforextrades · 274,725
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
KING OF ALL SPORTS (KOAS)
@KOASOFFICIAL · 94,716
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Amber 😘💋
@amberlicious7 · 114,742
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FarmercistJournal” (@farmercistjournal0), 41,470 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farmercistjournal0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.