Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Shelpid.WI3M

@shelpidwi3m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,045subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002020954687
TypeChannel
Username@shelpidwi3m
DescriptionBringing you the latest trends in #crypto 🔊 Twitter: https://twitter.com/Shelpid_WI3M Сooperation: https://twitter.com/Shelpid_WI3M
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shelpidwi3m

Growth

11,04511,09311,0697 August 2026 — 11,093 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,089 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,085 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,081 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,067 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,060 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,053 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,045 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,038–11,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:2911,045-8
13 Aug 2026, 01:3411,053-7
12 Aug 2026, 01:3211,060-7
10 Aug 2026, 22:2811,067-14
9 Aug 2026, 19:1111,081-4
8 Aug 2026, 18:2711,085-4
7 Aug 2026, 19:4411,089-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:1911,093first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
813
Videos
9
Links
834

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
115100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC726 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 A BIG STORM IS COMING FOR BITCOIN!! https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2070176305677545635?s=20

25 Jun 2026, 11:31 UTC749 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ATTENTION EUROPE: This changes everything. MiCA is now the law for crypto across the EU and most platforms still aren't ready for it. Some are scrambling. Some are quietly pulling out. And you deserve to know where your money actually stands. @OKX is ready. Fully compliant. Fully regulated. Built to meet Europe's strictest crypto standards from day one. Your crypto, finally safe. Ready whenever you are. https

24 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC667 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 I WARNED YOU. THE 2026 BUBBLE IS ABOUT TO POP!!! https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2069755548300423626

5 Jun 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 15 August 2026

A guy is quietly making $10K/month from faceless kids cartoons… all from his phone. No team. No studio. Just ChatGPT + simple tools. Full breakdown 👇 https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2062894209703526423

5 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC949 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026

One trader. One Mac Mini. A research system that generated $240k in 8 months. Full breakdown👇 https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2062824325451833808

4 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC904 viewsread 15 August 2026

Most developers are still renting AI. Some are buying it once. A $699 Mac Mini can replace hundreds in monthly AI subscriptions. Full breakdown👇 https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2062535149674226071

15 Apr 2026, 22:26 UTC≈1,450 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026

USDT Giveaway 💸 $3 for 50 people SEND A SCREENSHOT OF THIS MESSAGE IN THE COMMENTS • Like this post • Retweet it • Bookmark it

12

15 Apr 2026, 22:25 UTC≈1,200 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Everyone’s chasing the next AI narrative… But here’s something different: a $6B physical market going digital. @BRAVOREADYGAMES is unlocking Pokémon collectibles in a whole new way. And they’re not alone 👇 @MagicEden @phantom @bonk_inu @SolanaVentures This is the kind of play people notice late. I’m paying attention. https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2044541846928380273

1

14 Apr 2026, 17:34 UTC981 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Claude turned $500 → $36,600 in 14 days. No manual trades. Fully automated. Here's what most people get wrong about Polymarket. https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2044106293950955821

1

14 Apr 2026, 12:17 UTC897 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

At 4:07 AM, my phone buzzed. Not a message. A notification. +$3.87 captured +$6.42 captured +$12.71 captured I checked the terminal. $1,311. https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2044026338198106528

13 Apr 2026, 20:03 UTC741 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

My Girlfriend asked why I was smiling at 5 AM. Showed her the terminal. "What are all those green numbers?" $1,237. Made while she slept. "Doing what?" https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2043781433660240205

12 Apr 2026, 10:41 UTC750 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

IT WORKED… I didn’t build a bot. Claude built one for me. https://x.com/Shelpid_WI3M/status/2043277518988304534

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shelpidwi3m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shelpid.WI3M” (@shelpidwi3m), 11,045 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shelpidwi3m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.