Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto_Mama| MemeCoin, Defi & Airdrop

Channel

Crypto_Mama| MemeCoin, Defi & Airdrop

@Cryptomama100

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,136subscribers

-2,495 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611210988
TypeChannel
Username@Cryptomama100
DescriptionWe give you updates on future and ongoing DeFi, nft and airdrops to help you make money. WAGMI
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cryptomama100

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@wilson_space/113838 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC@Cryptomama100/9960 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@wilson_space/1159828 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC@Cryptomama100/10184 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@wilson_space/1183120 Sept 2026, 20:09 UTC@Cryptomama100/10404 · this entry20 Sept 2026, 20:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@wilson_space/119728 Oct 2026, 06:14 UTC@Cryptomama100/10508 · this entry8 Oct 2026, 06:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@wilson_space/1201416 Oct 2026, 17:27 UTC@Cryptomama100/10542 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC1.0072 seconds
@wilson_space/1208523 Oct 2026, 09:35 UTC@Cryptomama100/10591 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 09:35 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@wilson_space126 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@wilson_space (118–8)
@Digitekalphas62 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (38–24)
@DTCSIWEB38 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 141 of the 142 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 196 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @wilson_space. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

26,13628,63127,383.57 August 20269 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -2,495. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,762–29,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:0126,136-49
8 Nov 2026, 16:1726,185-39
7 Nov 2026, 10:5526,224-18
6 Nov 2026, 11:3426,242-41
5 Nov 2026, 08:2926,283-28
4 Nov 2026, 07:5626,311-37
3 Nov 2026, 06:3726,348-13
2 Nov 2026, 07:2626,361-22
1 Nov 2026, 06:4626,383-35
31 Oct 2026, 03:0826,418-24
30 Oct 2026, 06:1926,442-25
29 Oct 2026, 05:4826,467-31
28 Oct 2026, 01:4726,498-31
26 Oct 2026, 22:1126,529-27
26 Oct 2026, 00:1526,556-14
25 Oct 2026, 01:0826,570-23
24 Oct 2026, 03:2026,593-43
23 Oct 2026, 00:5726,636-23
21 Oct 2026, 20:5626,659-40
20 Oct 2026, 18:1126,699first reading

Engagement

651 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.983%
avg views ÷ 26,136 subscribers
Avg views / post
257
185 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
185
of 651 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 117 of 185 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held651 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total47,520
Reactions total446
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 05:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,110
Videos
≈21
Links
≈5,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,075 reactions across 340 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤50647.1%
🔥25924.1%
👍20519.1%
😁322.98%
🥰211.95%
👏181.67%
🤔121.12%
☃40.372%
🥱30.279%
😢20.186%
🙏20.186%
🌭10.093%
🎅10.093%
🎉10.093%
👀10.093%
👌10.093%
😍10.093%
😱10.093%
🤝10.093%
🤩10.093%
2 further kinds20.186%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 354 of the 651 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,075 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 651 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 649 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Cryptomama100. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 651 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 185 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 04:08 UTC43 viewsread 11 November 2026

If you are interested in daily signals in our community 👉sign up Bitunix and fund Trade and withdraw without kyc https://www.bitunix.com/register?vipCode=uwqq

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

11 Nov 2026, 04:04 UTC48 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Hot 🔥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Tp 0.6 Sl 0.09200 Don’t miss out

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

11 Nov 2026, 04:01 UTC47 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Gm 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Tp 2300 Sl 1940 Don’t miss out now

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 20:47 UTC123 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Push it up 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Tp 2300 Sl 1940 Don’t miss out

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC171 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Eth 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Long position Tp 2300 Sl 1940 Let’s go

🔥4

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 18:41 UTC161 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

330% hit 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Holding since 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Tp 0.6 Am the catalyst

🔥1

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC176 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

I need 1000 traders participate and repost Lets support https://x.com/cosmasanalyst/status/2120194098137059588?s=46

❤4

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Eth/usdt previous hit Sl after little movement 👉👉Long position Good entry currently Tp 2300 Sl 1930 Leverage 30x

❤3

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC274 views11 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Am inside Nysc camp But boys must eat

👍9❤1🤩1

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 07:38 UTC260 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

200% 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Morning food Tp 0.6 Am seeing something hot 🔥

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC228 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

My mission is we must win Tp 0.5 Motion 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

10 Nov 2026, 06:40 UTC222 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Boys and girls must eat 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Tp 0.5 Inside Nysc camp

❤1

Signed cosmas🐾 Catalyst 🐾

Showing the 12 most recent of 651 posts we hold for @Cryptomama100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Cryptomama100 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
16 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
26 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

BMS CRYPTO
@bloomstarbms · 24,633
#1
HEADBOY QUARTERS
@HBQuarters · 24,962
#2
FarmercistJournal
@farmercistjournal0 · 39,818
#3
(Pheyyi’s)Web3 Alpha /Airdrop
@PheyyiiAlphaChannel · 5,411
#4
DIGITEK DAO & ALPHA🔥
@Digitekalphas · 14,782
#5
CRYPTO COACH
@cryptocoachpro · 31,067
#6
MYRON: Airdrops.
@ChasetheChallenge · 18,851
#7
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 12,771,035
#8
Samtop crypto 👽
@samtopcrypto · 10,492
#9
explore: AI x Web3 Opportunities
@waleAlphaHub · 17,849
#10
THE ARENA ⚔️ 🌐
@erdfvj · 6,416
#11
Danny’s Tribe 🧸
@dannystribe · 25,919
#12
Bellick's Gallery
@BellickzGallery · 8,311
#13
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · 3,305,663
#14
🇺🇸 LAS VEGAS 🎰
@Lasvegazcity · 11,731
#15
Crypto Villa
@CryptoVillaCalls · 23,066
#16
Zero Gamblers
@zerogamblers · 13,671
#17
Smartecvitalik & Fam Alphas 🪂⚡
@smartecvitalikAlpha · 5,346
#18
Airdrop Official 🍥
@airdropofficial7 · 26,012
#19
Atoms Research
@atoms_research · 16,394
#20
Crypto4bailout Announcement/Ape&Pajeet
@Crypto4bailoutNews · 16,728
#21
Degen Den💰
@degendenn · 4,154
#22
FareaNFts
@FareaNFts · 12,511
#23
WILSON SPACE
@wilson_space · 33,910
#24
GA Crypto
@GaCryptOfficial · 36,134
#25
Pranjal | Airdrop Adventure 🧭
@AirdropAdventureYT · 21,627
#26
Brains Degens 🀄️
@brainsdegens · 16,467
#27
Catapult Extreme
@catapult_extreme · 7,596,342
#28
⚡️FastLife - Airdrop
@FastLife0x · 8,491
#29
🤑Maran's Crypto 💸
@maranscrypto · 16,968
#30
CRYPTO cUNTS
@RidingExtreme · 192,165
#31
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,046
#32
Fortizo DAO
@fortizodao · 4,093
#33
DeFi with InfoSpace_OG
@InfoSpaceOG · 13,309
#34
BEST INFO CHANNEL
@alsobalo · 531
#35
💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️
@cryptogg · 101,759
#36
SDX-TRADES & CHART COMMUNITY 📊📈📉
@sdxcrypto · 9,132
#37
Thisisnosa Drops
@thisisnosa · 4,650
#38
Alpha updates. 🪓
@Alpha_Updates · 18,644
#39
PRUDENTSAMMY UPDATE HUB
@PrudentDefiCalls · 4,726
#40
SLY ALPHA HUB
@leverageairdrops · 1,371
#41
exploring DeFi & web3
@alphawith_moh · 678
#42
I-MEDIA Gambles
@IMEDIA_ACADEMY · 3,217
#43
Liquidity Farmoors
@liquidityfarmoors · 2,111
#44
Plutos
@plutos_research · 8,865
#45
HottieBabeGem
@Hottie_Babe_Gem · 13,090
#46
The Void Academy
@TheVoidAcademy · 3,676 (as read 10 September 2026)
#47
Airdrop Cartel
@AirdrapCartel · 816
#48
NEW AIRDROPS VERIFIED
@new_airdropss · 40,512
#49
Feature earning
@feature_earning · 57,936
#50
Geek Channel
@oxgeekhub · 3,005
#51
Gustavo’s lair
@gustavo0499 · 1,086
#52
100KCRYPTO(Public Channel)
@I00kCryptoPublic · 2,450
#53
Rolling Dollars cartel
@rollingdollarscartel · 1,840
#54
Airdrop Finder
@airdropfind · 514,826
#55
DTCSI WEB3
@DTCSIWEB3 · 3,917
#56
DEETs ACADEMY
@Deetsacademy · 2,185
#57
Brawn of Crypto
@brawncrypto · 1,597
#58
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,423,087
#59
D LEGEND’S ALPHA
@LegendsAlphas · 19,324
#60
WGT DAO
@WGTDAO · 21,489
#61
HOT Updates
@hotonnear · 4,290,950
#62
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 7,833,486
#63
House Of Xeus📉📈
@HouseOfXeus · 24,553
#64
Alphas in Valhalla ⚔️
@AlphasnValhalla · 7,075
#65
Yescoin
@theyescoin · 5,148,896
#66
Brains Signals 𓃵
@brainssignals · 26,669
#67
Cupsy’s Diary
@cupsysdiary · 753
#68
Banana Announcement
@banana_update · 1,290,496
#69
Cryptogem Hub
@ctghub · 6,692
#70
SEED Updates
@seedupdates · 7,246,174
#71
Billionaires Playground 💹💚
@BillionairesPlayground · 7,950
#72
Blessed labs 𓃵
@Blessedmemecalls · 24,054
#73
CryptoRank Analytics
@cryptoranknews · 606,124
#74
KELVIN_TALENT TRADING ARENA
@kelvin_talent · 81,535
#75
Crypto With Shola
@cryptowithshola · 113,917
#76
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 632,289
#77
Big_Quiv Alpha plays
@Quivira_hub1 · 3,323
#78
RUMBLE💹
@Rumble001 · 3,810
#79
tallslimboy jnr!
@TSBHUB · 2,094
#80
Crypto Radar (EN)
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 705,687
#81
WATCoin
@watbird · 1,368,822
#82
PAUL GENIUS COMMUNITY 📈📉
@AmbassadorsHubCrytokademy · 3,603
#83
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,123
#84
UCHE CRYPT
@uchecrypto · 30,099
#85
TonNomads
@tonnomads · 23,882
#86
CHE$KY CALL 🎲
@CheskyCall · 14,405
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FarmercistJournal
@farmercistjournal0 · 39,818
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
BMS CRYPTO
@bloomstarbms · 24,633
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
HEADBOY QUARTERS
@HBQuarters · 24,962
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Modern Crypto calls
@moderncryptoanalyst · 25,522
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
MYRON: Airdrops.
@ChasetheChallenge · 18,851
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
Crypto Villa
@CryptoVillaCalls · 23,066
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
Danny’s Tribe 🧸
@dannystribe · 25,919
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
CRYPTO COACH
@cryptocoachpro · 31,067
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
GRINDER'S CORNER
@grinderscorner · 132,477
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
WILSON SPACE
@wilson_space · 33,910
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Airdrop Official 🍥
@airdropofficial7 · 26,012
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
Alpha updates. 🪓
@Alpha_Updates · 18,644
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
Sea of Satoshi 💧(CTO)
@sea_of_satoshi · 31,270
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
Skill Afrika
@LaptopLaivstyle · 43,320
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Alpha Farm
@alphapham · 32,745
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
XM Trading Academy
@ahmedfreesignals · 301,425
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Instablog9ja
@Instablog9jaofficial · 376,676
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 11 August 2026
House Of Xeus📉📈
@HouseOfXeus · 24,553
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Brains Signals 𓃵
@brainssignals · 26,669
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
Kagan & His Crypto Bestfriends
@kaganandhiscryptobestfriends · 51,614
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto With Shola
@cryptowithshola · 113,917
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
Techriz💯📈
@Techriztm · 47,095
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
UCHE CRYPT
@uchecrypto · 30,099
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Wimar.X
@WimarX · 40,121
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 61 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto_Mama| MemeCoin, Defi & Airdrop” (@Cryptomama100), 26,136 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptomama100.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.