Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Yet Another Analyst

@another_sa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,557subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494734302
TypeChannel
Username@another_sa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/another_sa

Growth

6,5576,5716,5646 August 2026 — 6,571 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,571 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,569 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,557 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,555–6,573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:066,557-12
9 Aug 2026, 13:016,569-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:196,571no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:206,571first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 6,557 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.838%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total22,871
Reactions total176
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9226.0%
🔥8724.6%
👍6819.2%
😁5214.7%
💯4211.9%
👎61.69%
🤔30.847%
🏆20.565%
👀10.282%
💩10.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
53
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @another_sa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC871 views10 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Есть кто на ит пикнике сегодня?

👍82

3 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,650 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Други, приходите порисовать стрелочки и квадратики на нашем архмитапе в «Школе 21» послезавтра в Москве. Регу завтра в 12:00 мск закрываем, не тяните. https://t.me/techanalyst_club/481

🔥7

3 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,610 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#API Не прошло и пяти лет, как в HTTP утвердили глагол QUERY. Вот теперь заживем! Краткая история: • сложные запросы плохо ложатся в query-параметры • 10 лет назад пытались пофиксить, разрешив слать тело в GET, но никто это особо не поддержал • сейчас решили вынести этот кейс в отдельный глагол Как это будет выглядеть: QUERY /contacts HTTP/1.1 Host: example.org Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Accept

😁2👍1

27 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,390 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет, есть кто из екб? Завтра делаем митап вместе с аналитиками Контура, будем говорить про иишечку и тусить у них на набережной. Инфа ниже, приходите. А еще буду там всю среду — пишите, можем собраться на чаек или еще что.

🔥7

27 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,600 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @techanalyst_clubPhoto

Привет, Екатеринбург! Через неделю делаем оффлайн митап вместе с аналитиками Контура. Обсудим, чем AI может помочь в работе, и как эффективно использовать LLM. Что в программе: • Андрей Бураков — У нас был контекст, мы им управляли? • Светлана Дергачева — AI-дизайн для аналитиков: design‑as‑code, работа с презентациями, кликабельные интерфейсы и генерация дизайн-системы • Сергей Петров — Как мы автоматизировали

4🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,950 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Год назад писал, как с помощью ChatGPT пробовал интегрироваться с разными публичными сервисами. Тогда были проблемы с интерпретацией пользовательских сценариев, маппингом на технические вызовы, проектированием асинхронных взаимодействий. Сейчас кинул ссылку на здоровую эквайринговую доку и надиктовал голосом, что хочу — Fable и Opus 4.8, задали правильные вопросы, построили схемы, задизайнили БД. В некоторых местах

👍148

21 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

На какой воркшоп сходили бы?

  1. Как обеспечить НФТ на этапе архитектуры52%
  2. Трейдоффы в архитекуре33%
  3. Никакой, оба неинтересны15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,860 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

И снова обращаюсь к коллективному разуму. Сейчас выбираю тему воркшопа на осенний Analyst Days 23. Ткните в опрос ниже, плз. Как обеспечить НФТ на этапе архитектуры Аналитики (и разрабы, чо уж) часто грешат тем, что выявляют и фиксируют значимые НФТ, отдают их в команду или архитектору... и забывают о них. На воркшопе возьмем архкейс, обсудим требования и посмотрим, какие конкретные решения позволяют их обеспечить

👍4

18 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC≈1,770 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Где слушаете подкасты?

  1. Youtube25%
  2. Яндекс.Музыка33%
  3. Apple Podcast9%
  4. VK Музыка3%
  5. Spotify6%
  6. Свой вариант в комментах1%
  7. Вообще не слушаю23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍21

17 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,730 views68 reactions53 Starsread 12 August 2026

Я вам тут послушать принес Тот самый подкаст с Русланом Сафиным, где обсуждаем развитие код-агентов, будущее индустрии, изменение ролей, чему нужно будет учиться дальше. Получилось философски и визионерски, с поразительным качеством и фантастическим пост-продакшеном. 🔥 Никаких манипуляций: накидаете 50 лайков — будет выпуск про Spec Driven Design глазами техдира и аналитика

54🔥14

16 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,670 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Если вы пробовали Claude Design, и немного в шоке от того, сколько токенов жрет эта тварь, то приходите вечером к нам в клуб: будем разбирать Pencil.dev — работает на вашей любимой модельке, результат ничуть не хуже, аппетиты куда скромнее.

👀1

15 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,820 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

2026 год. Тестируем в проде Прикручиваю известный экваринг к боту клуба, назовем его СР. Искренне считаю его одним из лучших, если не лучшими эквайрингом в РФ. Как минимум, самым удобным. Есть у них услуга облачной фискализации, чтобы не платить за собственную кассу. Гоняю финальные тесты, понимаю, что чек не приходит. Пишу в поддержку и узнаю, что фича работает только на проде, там и тестируйте. Инженер внутри н

👍20

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @another_sa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Poll204 voters

На какой воркшоп сходили бы?

  1. Как обеспечить НФТ на этапе архитектуры52%
  2. Трейдоффы в архитекуре33%
  3. Никакой, оба неинтересны15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTCAnonymous Poll330 voters

Где слушаете подкасты?

  1. Youtube25%
  2. Яндекс.Музыка33%
  3. Apple Podcast9%
  4. VK Музыка3%
  5. Spotify6%
  6. Свой вариант в комментах1%
  7. Вообще не слушаю23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 16,051 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Yet Another Analyst” (@another_sa), 6,557 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/another_sa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.