Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
40,900 average views per post against 46,576 subscribers — an engagement rate of 87.8%. Across the 7,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,961 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.93% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.4%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
18 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
736,300
Mature posts only
91.3% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1,397. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,197–47,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:27
46,804
+228
11 Aug 2026, 20:15
46,576
+223
10 Aug 2026, 22:54
46,353
+387
10 Aug 2026, 01:51
45,966
+306
8 Aug 2026, 23:03
45,660
+215
7 Aug 2026, 20:00
45,445
+38
7 Aug 2026, 15:31
45,407
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
82.0%
avg views ÷ 46,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
38,400
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
23 (13 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
767,700
Reactions total
19,448
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
104
Videos
4
Links
38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 52s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23,493 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,556
32.2%
custom 5992440763399539920
5,782
24.6%
custom 5960800074337359179
2,783
11.8%
custom 5961026285969871296
1,767
7.52%
custom 5978660425254834631
1,724
7.34%
custom 5217521207414369599
1,660
7.07%
custom 5850264052978159801
536
2.28%
custom 5954060342936998226
492
2.09%
custom 5780416859564150451
460
1.96%
custom 5911335270996775324
359
1.53%
custom 5188650445840591586
261
1.11%
🌭
113
0.481%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
149
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 22 we hold a reading for · 73%
Most on one post
74
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @claearly. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
8.70%
2 of 23 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
20,400
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
43,200
over 20 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGacNAV
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Зацените че нашел)
Мой канал каким-то образом попал в рейтинг ТРЕЙДЕРОВ 🤣
Обзор на мой канал от каких-то ребят. Там, в целом, много добрых и приятных слов, за это огромное спасибо 😊
Единственный доеб, что я кручу себе аудиторию в телеге)
Я бы с кайфом это как-то опроверг, но не знаю как. Никогда никого не крутил и даже не знаю как это делается. Если можно это как-то пруфануть, готов пруфануть. Напишите как.
Коллеги, отвлекитесь от рабочих задач!
Новый ролик на бусти.
Частенько звучат вопросы аля "А как какать?", поэтому ближайшие роликов 7 -10 там будут ответы для людей у которых появились первые деньги, а чего с ними делать понимания 0.
Первый - пошаговый алгоритм "Че делать?", который я сам хотел бы получить 8 лет назад.
Что внутри:
— когда вообще пора начинать, а когда не надо
— почему не надо сразу нести все на …
Мне много народу написало вопросы в личку про прошлый пост, поэтому сегодня будет незапланированная интеграция финуслуг.
Если вы всё ещё держите часть денег на вкладах (как и я) и по какой-то причине не слышали про них, то там можно открывать вклады (на самом деле еще много чего можно). Это вообще проект московской биржи.
Для новых клиентов они дают повышенный процент. Для вас это значит, что доходность у вас выше,…
Отчет за июль
Кешфлоу: 85 165 (все реинвест, как обычно)
Проинвестировал: пока 0, надо доехать до банкомата. Я перекидывал в замещайки наличную часть подушки, надо пополнить. Будет +-200к, мб 300, пока не решил, сейчас просто на карте лежит.
Капитал: 138 651$ (считал по 79,46)
1) 800к подвиснет на какой-то срок. Прилеты по ВБ создали ребятам серьезные финансовые проблемы. Увы, хуйня случается. Я пока не решил, в ка…
За прошлый месяц потратил 64 000 рублей на подарки
Это абсолютный рекорд, за весь прошлый год потратил 67 000.
За июль посетил 3 свадьбы, 2 мальчишника, 4 дня рождения.
Соответственно вопрос:
Сколько надо дарить на свадьбу?
Моя позиция: десятка с человека - это самый минимум. Меньше десятки - зашквар.
Ваше мнение 👇
Где государство прячет от вас 10 000 000р за ребенка?
Или
Льготы на ребенка, о которых не знает ни одна мама (и папа).
Вторая часть демографии крч
Приятного просмотра
ССЫЛКА НА РОЛИК
ССЫЛКА НА РОЛИК
ССЫЛКА НА РОЛИК
⚔️👁⚔️
Доброй ночи
Только что доделали 2 часть "Демографии"
Завтра в 16:00 дроп
Во вложении вам на затравочку то, что с рофлами делает авторское право
Как будто, стало даже лучше. Смотреть со звуком и до конца.
Я спать 🐹
Ориг на несколько сообщений выше, если кто не видел
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @claearly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 516,392 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коротко и внятно” (@claearly), 46,804 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/claearly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
