Высокие люди прошлого! ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍6🤔6

Channel
@DrygaiIstoria
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,655subscribers
-209 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001170745783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrygaiIstoria |
| Description | О самых невероятных исторических фактах, которые скрывает наука. Купить рекламу - @GodSpeed8 Администрация не отвечает за рекламу. ❗Вся информация на канале - оценочное суждение и плод фантазии автора.❗ |
| Created | 20 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrygaiIstoria |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 40,655 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 40,664 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 40,675 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 40,683 | -16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 40,699 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 40,711 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 40,719 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:26 | 40,726 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 40,727 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 40,729 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 40,734 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 40,738 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 40,743 | -12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 40,755 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 40,761 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 40,770 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 40,778 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 40,780 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 40,786 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 40,795 | first reading |
197 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 197 (3 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 198,491 |
| Reactions total | 3,978 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,321 reactions across 197 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3,736 | 51.0% | |
| 🤔 | 2,071 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 523 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 340 | 4.64% | |
| ❤ | 329 | 4.49% | |
| 🤣 | 322 | 4.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Высокие люди прошлого! ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍6🤔6
Гигантская растительность близ вулканов. Гавайский остров Мауи. «Человеческая фигура дает четкое представление о размерах зеленого гиганта, произрастающего в узком ущелье на склоне потухшего вулкана Халеакала», – говорится в февральском номере National Geographic за 1924 год. ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍13🔥5🤔1
Еще один пример изобретения человечества, позаимствованного из далекого прошлого. По словам историков, туфли, показанные в кадре, на самом деле назывались «велосипедными туфлями», и они были в моде в Париже 1920-х годов. Удивительно, но история роликовых коньков уходит ещё дальше в прошлое: упоминания обуви в стиле роликовых коньков можно найти в записях уже в XVIII веке. ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍16🤔5
Чудо природы, нарушающее законы физики. Насыпь из вулканической породы, известная как инзельберг, выдержала стихию и осталась прочной и возвышающейся, в то время как окружающая местность стерлась. Термин «инзельберг» является синонимом слова «монаднок», которое происходит от названия горы Монаднок в Нью- Гэмпшире. ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🤔15👍6🤣3🔥2
Необычная гора уже многие годы вызывают споры людей. Существует группа лиц, которая считает что это рукотворная пирамида. Часть людей полагает, что оно осталось от древних цивилизаций. Глядя на эту гору легко поверить в такие теории. Рукотворная - 👍 Природное - 🤔 ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍40🤔6❤1
Почему в прошлом все строили в одном стиле? В прошлом мир якобы был неизвестен, и все жили на своих местах, а переплыть океан было невозможно, либо практически невозможно. Но как тогда объяснить одинаковые технологии, пирамиды, дольмены, различные изображения, и все это на разных континентах, и у разных народов, будто они обменивались знаниями. ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍14🤔6
Акустический эффект, называемый "хвост Кетцаля", возникает, когда кто-то издает импульсивный звук, аплодисменты или игру на ударном инструменте перед ступенью пирамиды. Если мы сделаем пощечину около 40 метров на перпендикуляре лестницы, мы услышим резкий звук, странный писк, звук, похожий на пение кетцаля, священной птицы майя. ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍17🤔7👎1
Древние египетские иероглифы на австралийских скалах. Не далеко от Сиднея, рядом с городком Карионг, есть живописное нагромождение скал, на их гладких стенах начертаны некие загадочные письмена. Вход в расселину со стороны почти незаметен. Об этих письменах более ста лет знали только местные жители. Однако, как выяснилось, наскальные знаки, ни что иное, как древнеегипетские иероглифы. Обе стены расселины густо ус…
👍9🤔9❤1
Издание OTAGO WITNESS в 1913г опубликовало потрясающую статью: "Замечательные открытия скрытых храмов внутри Сфинкса были сделаны профессором Г.Риснером, египтологом Гарвардского университета. Голова Сфинкса занята двумя маленькими камерами, одна над другой, а само тело Сфинкса также занято более крупным храмом с колоннами и проходами, ведущими в нескольких направлениях". Поудивлялись, повосхищались и... забыли. Лю…
🤔15👍6❤2🔥2
Нет, это не пришелец из фантастического фильма — это всего лишь плавунец под увеличением. ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍20🤔5🔥4❤1
В 1806-1815г, на территории, где находится Помпеи, начаты первые раскопки усилиями почти 700 рабочих На гравюре Пиранези 1788г "Вид на храм Исиды в городе Помпеи" есть небольшой, незаметный такой колодец с доступом к водоводу Фонтаны (к гравюре есть подписи). Вопрос, как на гравюре засыпанного города мог оказаться водовод, глубина которого 7м? Сам спросил и сам отвечу - это возможно только в случае, если город еще …
👍27🤔7🔥3
Расположено в Гаропабе, штат Санта-Катарина, Бразилия, на тропе Сфинксов. Что же создавали здесь? Была ли это лишь голова сфинкса — или нечто куда более грандиозное? ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
👍22🤔11❤4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @DrygaiIstoria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ” (@DrygaiIstoria), 40,655 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrygaiIstoria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.