Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 93 days, net -461. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,334–40,933 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 10:56
40,403
-5
6 Nov 2026, 08:38
40,408
-6
5 Nov 2026, 09:27
40,414
-5
4 Nov 2026, 08:56
40,419
-6
3 Nov 2026, 10:00
40,425
-5
2 Nov 2026, 12:55
40,430
-11
1 Nov 2026, 09:28
40,441
-5
31 Oct 2026, 09:36
40,446
-3
30 Oct 2026, 12:56
40,449
-5
29 Oct 2026, 11:00
40,454
-4
28 Oct 2026, 06:27
40,458
-11
27 Oct 2026, 02:41
40,469
-8
26 Oct 2026, 03:18
40,477
-12
25 Oct 2026, 04:07
40,489
-12
24 Oct 2026, 04:10
40,501
-1
23 Oct 2026, 02:29
40,502
-4
22 Oct 2026, 01:37
40,506
-8
20 Oct 2026, 17:28
40,514
-5
19 Oct 2026, 17:28
40,519
-2
18 Oct 2026, 15:16
40,521
first reading
Engagement
359 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 177 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.92%
avg views ÷ 40,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 359 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
359 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
202,960
Reactions total
4,018
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
51m 32s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 110 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,570 reactions across 359 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,950
51.2%
🤔
4,078
30.1%
🔥
877
6.46%
❤
690
5.08%
🤣
614
4.52%
👎
361
2.66%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 359 of the 359 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,570 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 359 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 359 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DrygaiIstoria. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 359 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 102 posts held from the last 30 days (1.96%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В Пакистане обнаружен объект, получивший название «Второй Сфинкс». Некоторые считают его природным образованием, но форма головы, напоминающая портрет фараона, и следы обработки на скале под ним — симметричные колонны и ступенчатые ниши — ставят это под сомнение. Два рядом расположенных объекта с признаками искусственной обработки трудно считать простым совпадением. Теперь остаётся убедить в этом научное сообщество, …
Статуя рептилии из Японского храма Хорю-дзи.
Статуя рептилии из Японского храма Хорю-дзи, основанного 607 году, до недавнего времени хранил этот странный артефакт.
К сожалению, сейчас увидеть его невозможно. Артефакт приобретен неизвестным лицом и отправлена в закрытый частный музей.
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Древняя дорога обнаружена в Чехии.
Чешские археологи из Восточно-чешского музея обнаружили фрагмент средневековой дороги, датируемой XIV веком в Пардубице.
Древняя дорога была обнаружена на современной улице Зеленобранская: ее обнаружили во время раскопок для ремонта ворот. Средневековая дорога была примерно на полтора метра ниже сегодняшнего уровня улицы.
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Перед вами – маугли в реальной жизни.
Прототип Маугли из сказки Киплинга не обладал такой же обаятельной внешностью, как в советском мультфильме, созданном по мотивам этой истории.
Дина Саничар, обнаруженный охотниками в джунглях в 1867 году, в первые годы своей жизни считал себя волком и провел многие годы пытаясь приспособиться к человеческой жизни.
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Зубчатый шпиль 500-летнего индуистского храма вновь появился из-под воды в реке Маханади в Одише, Индия. Построенный в XVI–XVII веках, храм оказался затоплен после наводнения и изменения русла реки в XIX веке. Позже его местоположение было утрачено из-за строительства плотины Хиракуд, затопившей около 50 храмов. Сейчас шпиль вновь стал видим, но основная часть здания остаётся занесённой песком. Археологи не планируют…
На фото изображен артефакт, который похож на гигантскую сковородку, найденный 31 августа 2021 года случайно во время дорожного строительства в Бантуле, Индонезия.
На нижнем фото запечатлен барельеф со стен Кармы-вибханга в храме Боробудур, Центральная Ява. Полная панель состоит из 3 полей. На средней панели изображены люди, готовящиеся на больших пламенных казанах, а рядом стоят гиганты.
Расстояние между расположен…
Будто города на старинных гравюрах после какой-то катастрофы. Что же могло произойти, что всё оказалось разрушено и засыпано глиной?
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Археологическая сенсация в центре города!
Во время проведения строительных работ был обнаружен засыпанный первый этаж старого здания. Оказалось, что в далёком прошлом уровень земли был значительно ниже, а современные улицы скрывают под собой целые слои истории!
Были ли здесь когда-то подвалы, улицы или даже целые здания? Пока остаётся загадкой…
Как думаете, сколько ещё таких «забытых этажей» скрывает городская поч…
В 1891 году в долине округа Су, штат Небраска, было обнаружено удивительное подземное образование, поражающее своей необычностью и загадочной формой. Его назвали «Штопором дьявола» — Daemonelix. Эти структуры выглядели как гигантские штопоры, точно и аккуратно ввинченные в земную толщу какой-то неведомой силой. Геометрия спиралей была столь совершенной, что трудно было поверить в их природное происхождение — казалось…
До начала 20 века в США родители спокойно могли отправить ребёнка по почте. В те времена они практически не переживали за сохранность своего чада.
Формальный присмотр за ребёнком на момент транспортировки возлагался на сотрудника почты. Этой услугой родители обычно пользовались, когда нужно было отправить дитя к бабушке с дедушкой.
ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ➙ ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
Представляем вам прозрачное подводное создание — Cystisoma.
Это необычный креветкоподобный житель, обитающий в океане на глубине 600-1000м, почти полностью прозрачно. Размер взрослой особи - до 12 см.
Уникальные анатомические особенности этого ракообразного позволяют ему сохранять почти полную невидимость и успешно защищаться от хищников.
Уникально и очень странно для нашего мира. Быть может, среди животных есть н…
👍21🤔11❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 359 posts we hold for @DrygaiIstoria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Разгадки истории @razgadki · 20,689 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
X-Files | Секретные материалы 👽 @X_Files_sekretnyye · 23,709 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 September 2026
Хистори.Эко @history_eco · 21,640 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 September 2026
НЕОБЪЯСНИМО, НО ФАКТ @neobyasnimofact · 22,116 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Председатель СНТ @predsedatelprav · 43,883 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Глубина @thedeepsee · 41,505 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
Забытые руины @narniyantik · 25,095 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
ЭТОТ ПРЕКРАСНЫЙ И ТАИНСТВЕННЫЙ МИР @mir_krasoti_i_tain · 26,160 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Наука дня | Факты @sciensday · 55,623 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
Наше здоровье | Блог Алексеева @nasche_zdor · 18,677 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 October 2026
история пи @istoriapioficial · 19,933 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
АНТИУТОПИЯ @utopiyaproject · 30,551 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Строитель @stroiteltut · 54,093 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026
Исторический Вольнодумец @istorvoln · 25,229 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДРУГАЯ ИСТОРИЯ” (@DrygaiIstoria), 40,403 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrygaiIstoria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.