International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104,117–104,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:22
104,230
-7
15 Sept 2026, 16:38
104,237
+29
13 Sept 2026, 23:36
104,208
+21
12 Sept 2026, 06:37
104,187
-20
10 Sept 2026, 00:20
104,207
-8
6 Sept 2026, 15:02
104,215
+8
4 Sept 2026, 01:17
104,207
-44
2 Sept 2026, 19:05
104,251
-95
1 Sept 2026, 18:13
104,346
-66
31 Aug 2026, 15:36
104,412
-24
30 Aug 2026, 18:58
104,436
+14
29 Aug 2026, 21:37
104,422
-20
28 Aug 2026, 23:36
104,442
-8
28 Aug 2026, 02:35
104,450
-7
27 Aug 2026, 01:42
104,457
-12
26 Aug 2026, 03:17
104,469
-32
25 Aug 2026, 04:48
104,501
-79
24 Aug 2026, 04:28
104,580
-3
22 Aug 2026, 15:05
104,583
-68
21 Aug 2026, 07:34
104,651
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 104,230 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,600
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
85 (22 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
504,320
Reactions total
16,396
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 22:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈421
Videos
≈1,630
Links
≈1,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 31m
Average length
1m 30s
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40,317 reactions across 80 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
17,035
42.3%
👍
13,866
34.4%
❤
6,846
17.0%
🫡
816
2.02%
😁
545
1.35%
👏
269
0.667%
💯
266
0.66%
🙏
134
0.332%
🤣
118
0.293%
🤩
86
0.213%
👎
65
0.161%
🥰
65
0.161%
❤🔥
47
0.117%
🎉
41
0.102%
👌
30
0.074%
🤝
26
0.064%
🤔
24
0.06%
😱
15
0.037%
🤬
6
0.015%
😭
5
0.012%
5 further kinds
12
0.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41,447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
283
across the posts below
Posts paid on
79
of 81 we hold a reading for · 98%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @terraops. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Палають вантажівки, танк і мотоцикли — привіт від СБУ!
Під час операції «Вівальді» Третього армійського корпусу FPV спецпідрозділу «Альфа» СБУ нищили піхоту противника, незважаючи на «антидронові» плащі, які тільки більше привертали увагу.
Вистежили і знищили бронетехніку та транспортні засоби росіян. Як ворог по частинах лягає в землю, на яку прийшов — у відео!
Третій армійський корпус | Instagram | Facebook | Yo…
💥 Екіпаж літака Ан-28 ПС ЗСУ вогнем з кулемета "Minigun" знищує російський дрон-камікадзе "Гербера-2".
☑️ Підписуйтесь на канал TERRA Розвідка Інфо - https://t.me/terraops
🫡 Корпус Білецького домінує за рахунок тактики застосування нової техніки. Воює не техніка, а люди.
🤝 Донатити на дрони для TERRA:
Moнобанка
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8BDHzcY5HV
5375 4112 0378 6111 (карта monobank)
- Інші способи донату:
terraops.info/donate
- YouTube підрозділу:
youtube.com/@TerraOpsUA
“Наше завдання - зробити так, щоб після українського "Вівальді" російська армія дедалі частіше чула "Реквієм" Моцарта”.
Обов’язково прочитайте цю колонку!
https://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2026/09/23/8054746/
👀 Шалена кількість українських FPV-ждунів на одній з доріг неподалік Лиману Донецької області в об'єктиві російського коптера👍
☑️ Підписуйтесь на канал TERRA Розвідка Інфо - https://t.me/terraops
☝️ Дізнавайтесь інформацію з фронту тільки через верифіковані джерела. Читайте соціальні мережі Третього Армійського Корпусу і його підрозділів. Там все про що можна говорити і потрібно знати.
🤝 Донатити на дрони для TERRA:
Moнобанка
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8BDHzcY5HV
5375 4112 0378 6111 (карта monobank)
- Інші способи донату:
terraops.info/donate
- YouTube підрозділу:
youtube.com/@TerraOpsUA
💥 Наш результат за літню кампанію - розширення “сірої зони”. Тобто маємо локальний відступ ворога.
🤝 Донатити на дрони для TERRA:
Moнобанка
https://send.monobank.ua/jar/8BDHzcY5HV
5375 4112 0378 6111 (карта monobank)
- Інші способи донату:
terraops.info/donate
- YouTube підрозділу:
youtube.com/@TerraOpsUA
Білецький: «Вівальді» триває і набирає обертів. Третій корпус звільнив Шандриголове, Дерилове і встановив повний контроль над Дробишевим
У 1 та 2 сезонах наступальної операції «Вівальді» Третій армійський корпус та придані підрозділи повернули під український контроль вже 125 км² територій, з яких 50 км² — деокуповали.
Знищено ще 800 солдатів противника. Загальні втрати рф за обидва сезони — понад 3000 о. с. Корпус…
«Вівальді» і ворожа логістика: траси забезпечення армії рф під ударом Трійки!
Кадри знищення ворожих вантажівок з БК, провізією, пальним і особовим складом за 120 км від ЛБЗ на Лиманському напрямку.
Чи буде що їсти окупантам на передовій — тепер вирішують розрахунки 3-го ОРБ корпусу, 21-го ОПБпС KRAKEN та ББС Третьої штурмової.
Третій армійський корпус | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube | Threads | ab3.army | TikTok…
Middle-strike дрони Трійки перерізали російську логістику на Лиманщині!
Під час операції «Вівальді» Третього армійського корпусу дрони ізолювали район бойових дій на глибину до 50 км, а згодом розширили зону ураження до 120 км.
Це створило суттєву кризу в системі матеріально-технічного забезпечення підрозділів 20-ї армії рф. Окупанти на передовій зіткнулися з перебоями у постачанні пального, боєприпасів і провізії.…
🔥319👍92❤37👎3😍3🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @terraops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
К-2 @k_2army · 157,147 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
110 ОМБр @ombr_110 · 32,552 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
AEROBOMBER_UA @aerobomber_ua · 30,023 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Алексей Юков | Плацдарм @platsdarmslavyansk2022 · 24,850 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 September 2026
UKRAINE WAR Video 🇺🇦🔞 @militarywarvideo · 38,074 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
Третій армійський корпус @ab3army · 278,691 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
ДОБРИК live @dobrik_live · 22,213 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
Strike Drone Company @strikedronescompany · 49,198 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
RFU News — Strategic Geopolitics @RFU_EN · 50,000 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
WarLife 18+ Украина Россия Война 18+ @Voyna18 · 197,990 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Ukrainian Witness | War in Ukraine @warinukraineua · 20,916 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 September 2026
Denys Davydov @pilotblog · 195,140 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Warriors Ukrainian🇺🇦 @warriorsukrainian · 40,875 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
KRAKEN | ПБС 3 Армійського Корпусу @kraken_ab3 · 71,771 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
KARYMAT @karymat · 73,150 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
1-й корпус НГУ «Азов» @azov_media · 237,844 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
47 окрема механізована бригада «Маґура» @brygada47 · 52,416 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
МАДЯР🇺🇦 @robert_magyar · 603,010 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TERRA Розвідка Інфо” (@terraops), 104,230 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terraops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.