https://youtu.be/efeH9QlBO3U?si=eSxE6kLTjIFM9YRz
💔100🙏42❤5😢4🔥2

Channel
@platsdarmslavyansk2022
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,850subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001587930135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @platsdarmslavyansk2022 |
| Description | Пошук загиблих | |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/platsdarmslavyansk2022 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
28,800 average views per post against 24,850 subscribers — an engagement rate of 115.8%. Across the 1,153 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,257–31,590 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 9.98% and 26.6%, with a median of 16.7%.
| Window | 30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 374,030 |
| Mature posts only | 124.1% over 12 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 24,850 measured 25 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:ukr · 1,153 channels · p10 5.98% · p25 9.98% · p50 16.7% · p75 26.6% · p90 38.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.566th percentile · 6.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.023% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Ukrainian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 24,850 | -109 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 24,959 | -17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 24,976 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 24,981 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 24,997 | -31 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 25,028 | -21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 25,049 | +30 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 25,019 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 25,011 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 25,019 | +20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 24,999 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 25,009 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 25,029 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 25,026 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 25,029 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 25,024 | +35 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 24,989 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 24,993 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 24,992 | +12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 24,980 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (15 May 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 386,720 |
| Reactions total | 6,639 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22,905 reactions across 41 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 7,976 | 34.8% | |
| 🙏 | 6,459 | 28.2% | |
| 💔 | 4,746 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 2,476 | 10.8% | |
| 🫡 | 747 | 3.26% | |
| 🕊 | 166 | 0.725% | |
| 🤬 | 159 | 0.694% | |
| 🤝 | 87 | 0.38% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 0.135% | |
| 😨 | 16 | 0.07% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 0.048% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 0.048% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 0.039% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 0.017% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.017% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.009% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.004% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,905 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/efeH9QlBO3U?si=eSxE6kLTjIFM9YRz
💔100🙏42❤5😢4🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
😢327🙏79🫡28💔23🕊12❤3🤝2👍1
РЕПОСТ ПАМ’ЯТІ Максим Ігнатенко. 34 роки. Воїн. Сапер. Людина, яка вміла працювати руками й любила землю, по якій ходила. 11 вересня 2026 року в районі міста Лиман Краматорського району загинув наш земляк - житель Билбасівки, солдат Максим Ігнатенко, старший сапер інженерно-саперного відділення батальйону безпілотних авіаційних комплексів військової частини А5175. Максим народився 13 лютого 1992 року. Його життя б…
😢224🙏68💔20🫡14❤6
Video, posted without a caption
🙏249😢99🫡14❤11🕊3🤝2
АДВІС «ПЛАЦДАРМ» ПРОДОВЖУЄ ПОШУК ЗАГИБЛИХ ТА ЗНИКЛИХ БЕЗВІСТИ «Співпрацюємо з бригадами. Завдяки спільним діям нам вдається евакуювати тіла загиблих, адже є ділянки, до яких дуже важко дістатися. Там заміновані території, постійно працюють ворожі дрони, які моніторять небо. Ми повинні розуміти, що кожен вихід може бути останнім. Але завдяки спільній роботі нам вдається забирати загиблих. Їхня задача - забезпечити бе…
❤110🙏101💔19🫡5
19 вересня 2022 року, під час проведення пошукової місії, керівник ГО «Асоціація дослідників військової історичної спадщини “Плацдарм”» Олексій Юков підірвався на міні та отримав важкі поранення. Поранення Олексій отримав під час пошукової роботи в зоні, де раніше відбувалися активні бойові дії. Місія була спрямована на встановлення місця знаходження та повернення загиблого військовослужбовця. Це була робота, пов’яза…
😢346💔112🙏64❤20🫡5
Повернуто ще 252 душі з горніла війни. «Це совість нашої країни. Це найкращі з найкращих, які ціною власного життя дають нам можливість проживати кожен день, прокидатися вранці, бачити вечірні зорі, обіймати своїх дітей і рідних. Саме вони стримували ворога. Саме вони - хлопці й дівчата, які щохвилини продовжують боронити спокій наших дітей. Це вони - наш щит і меч! Тому ми робимо все можливе для їхнього повернення.…
💔331🙏191😢57❤23🫡4
СЬОГОДНІ - ДЕНЬ НАРОДЖЕННЯ ОЛЕКСІЯ ЮКОВА «Друзі у меня сьогодні день Народження! Пошуком загиблих та безвісти зниклих я займаюся вже 28 років. Із 13 років повертаю душі з горнила війни. Скільки їх уже повернуто - страшно навіть думати. Стільки життів було забрано злом - людським злом… Із самого дитинства я бачив різні речі, яких не бачили інші люди, та відчував те, чого не міг пояснити. Світ потойбіччя набагато ближ…
💔730😢263🙏95❤43🫡33🕊16
06.09.2001 - 24.01.2023 Сьогодні - земний День народження нашого пошуковця Дениса Сосненко (@denic16). Хлопця, який, ризикуючи власним життям, шукав загиблих воїнів у зоні бойових дій. Стільки всього зроблено разом із тобою… Денис із самого початку повномасштабного вторгнення був у нашій групі. Разом ми пройшли небезпечні ділянки, пережили безліч моментів і повернули додому тих, кого вже чекали рідні. Сьогодні ми зг…
❤337🙏289💔129😢67🫡20
Video, posted without a caption
🙏161😢67❤7🫡7🤝3
Ще одне тіло… На сьогодні це вже 6-й росіянин. Будемо забирати й рухатись далі, бо тут ще багато має бути. Під час штурму цієї посадки їх загинуло чимало. Їх посилали в бій, знаючи, що шансів зайти сюди й вийти назад - фактично немає. Ось так вони й лежать - загиблі, нікому не потрібні, на чужій землі. Це дурість… Безглузда й страшна. Ось ще два тіла лежать у кущах. Вони, скоріш за все, намагалися тут сховатися. Їх з…
🙏173❤95🫡15🔥1
30 СЕРПНЯ - ДЕНЬ ЗНИКЛИХ БЕЗВІСТИ «Друзі, знайшли ще одного нашого хлопця. Скоріш за все, загинув унаслідок влучання FPV. Ось так ми працюємо… Я завжди обираю пошук загиблих та безвісти зниклих. Тому рідні, будь ласка, не ображайтеся на те, що ми можемо не відповідати на повідомлення. Тут часто стоїть вибір: відповідати на повідомлення чи продовжувати пошук. Ми обираємо пошук. Якщо є можливість - обов’язково відпові…
💔378🙏213❤47😢39🫡8🕊3🤯2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @platsdarmslavyansk2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@platsdarmslavyansk2022 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@platsdarmslavyansk2022 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алексей Юков | Плацдарм” (@platsdarmslavyansk2022), 24,850 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/platsdarmslavyansk2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.