Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Відсіч

Channel

Відсіч

@vidsichu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50,034subscribers

-5,833 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001538558451
TypeChannel
Username@vidsichu
DescriptionНебайдужі громадяни.
Created29 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vidsichu

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

49,28259,70454,49350,0346 August 20269 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 96 days, net -5,833. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,719–61,267 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:3650,034-108
8 Nov 2026, 09:5950,142-71
7 Nov 2026, 07:5450,213-68
6 Nov 2026, 04:5750,281+999
5 Nov 2026, 05:0949,282-59
4 Nov 2026, 01:0649,341-97
2 Nov 2026, 23:3449,438-51
1 Nov 2026, 21:0949,489-97
31 Oct 2026, 20:5649,586-55
30 Oct 2026, 20:5449,641-107
29 Oct 2026, 19:1149,748-53
28 Oct 2026, 15:5549,801-57
27 Oct 2026, 16:4849,858-53
26 Oct 2026, 18:1849,911-58
25 Oct 2026, 19:0949,969-91
24 Oct 2026, 16:4850,060-66
23 Oct 2026, 16:4850,126-46
22 Oct 2026, 19:2150,172-80
21 Oct 2026, 14:1750,252-40
20 Oct 2026, 12:4950,292first reading

Engagement

240 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.2%
avg views ÷ 50,034 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,590
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 240 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held240 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total642,230
Reactions total8,528
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 00:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,680
Videos
≈1,520
Links
≈2,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 23m
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

32,222 reactions across 238 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬8,29625.7%
😁4,91115.2%
🤡4,52314.0%
👍3,33810.4%
❤2,8638.89%
🤮2,2647.03%
💯2,1236.59%
👀1,6475.11%
🔥1,1623.61%
👏4711.46%
😢3611.12%
🫡2040.633%
🤝590.183%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 240 of the 240 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,383 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 240 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,110 views115 reactionsread 11 November 2026

НАБУ каже, що «Карфаген» має бути зруйнований. Але «імператор-прокурор» Руслан Кравченко не отримав підозру. Чому? І чому антикорупціонерів-активістів це влаштовує?

💯103😁9🤡2😢1

10 Nov 2026, 12:43 UTC≈2,150 views108 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Христина Ільницька, відома, як співмешканка скандального експрокурора Дмитра Вербицького, стала помічницею нардепа від «Батьківщини» Михайла Соколова. Підпишись

🤬81😁15🤡11❤1

10 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈2,400 views154 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Твоє лице, коли втік з України в Канаду, через 2 роки вернувся і спокійно «працюєш» депутатом. 🫠🫠🫠

🤮85🤬52😁10🤡5❤2

9 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,620 views85 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @teleTKACH

Тепер і так можна, виявляється. Ваш варіант? - закінчились гроші - закінчились гроші - закінчились гроші https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2026/11/09/8061947/

🤬78💯7

9 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,910 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

На «Українській правді» вийшла стаття про земельну комісію Київради. У ній журналісти чомусь протиставляють «корупціонера» Михайла Терентьєва і «депутата-антикорупціонера» Дмитра Білоцерковця. Враховуючи бекграунд Білоцерковця, це виглядає як мінімум дивно. Боротьба за земельну комісію — це боротьба київських кланів. Де Дмитро Білоцерковець представляє інтереси київського «смотрящего» Юрія Горового («Рижий»). Білоц…

👀33👍10❤5😢3👏1

9 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈2,740 views132 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @politbavovnaVideo

Блд 🙈 діда поплавило ПІДПИСАТИСЬ 📥

🤡86🤮38👍5❤3

7 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC≈3,320 views130 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @sbronikPhoto

На своїй сторінці у постах ЦПК обурюється тим, що фігуранти справи зливали дані з бази "Безпечне місто" виконавцям побиття людей. А це тоді що? 4 листопада (в день проведення обшуків і вручення підозр) о 12.43 год, тобто лише за кілька годин після початку слідчих дій, ЦПК у себе в телеграм виставили фото фігурантів справи - співробітників СБУ Ковальчука, Кравчука і Дуки. А що це якщо не злив? Ці фото - не просто …

💯68🤡43😁8❤4🤬4🤝2👀1

6 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC≈3,960 views107 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У росіянина Сергія Токарєва (Cosmolot) починає текти «дах». Всі поважні журналісти і активісти, яких купив Токарєв, можуть готуватись до «а ми ж не знали…». Насправді ж історія як з «Хімпромом» — всі все знають, просто Токарєв теж всіх купив. Так само як і Максим Кріппа доречі.

❤50💯40👀13👍4

6 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC≈3,810 views76 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Коли довго знаходишся в певному середовищі, то з часом стаєш частиною цього середовища. Поліцейський Володимир Ценов (він же Прайс) з ДСР яскраве цьому підтвердження. На суд Ценов прийшов у типовому луці київських офісників — штани C.P. Company (18 тис грн), светр C.P. Company (15 тис грн).

👀48😁20👍5❤3

5 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC≈3,960 views72 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @bihusinfoVideo

🗣 Денис про кислоту, Домінікану та нові плівки НАБУ А повне відео з розбором другої частини операції «Карфаген» уже на нашому каналі.

❤48👍17😁5😢2

5 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC≈4,750 views176 reactionsread 11 November 2026

За нашою інформацією, НАБУ затримало набагато більше людей, ніж було публічно повідомлено. Серед них є і дуже відомі люди. Чекаємо підтвердження і деталей.

👀92👍61🔥18❤5

5 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC≈4,730 views115 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ось так «5 канал» Петра Порошенко брав гроші в бариг і рекламував лідера наркосиндикату «Хімпром». «Бізнесмен і меценат», ага.

😁72🤬32🤮8❤1👀1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 240 posts we hold for @vidsichu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Відсіч” (@vidsichu), 50,034 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vidsichu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.