Channel
@azizrakhimov_blog
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,831subscribers
+1,594 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001195756117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @azizrakhimov_blog |
| Description | Bog’lanish uchun: @rahimov_aziz Reklama olmaymiz. |
| Created | 17 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/azizrakhimov_blog |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
64,900 average views per post against 59,831 subscribers — an engagement rate of 108.4%. Across the 24,255 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.61% and 15.1%, with a median of 6.80%.
| Window | 30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 583,900 |
| Mature posts only | 108.4% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 59,831 measured 17 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623 · 24,255 channels · p10 0.801% · p25 2.61% · p50 6.80% · p75 15.1% · p90 27.7% |
| Position in cohort | 99.814th percentile · 16.0× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.015% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:16 | 59,831 | +94 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 59,737 | +50 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 59,687 | +363 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 59,324 | +237 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 59,087 | +371 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 58,716 | +202 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 58,514 | +41 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 58,473 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:34 | 58,480 | +23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 58,457 | +115 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 58,342 | +50 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 58,292 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 58,286 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 58,280 | +57 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 58,223 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 58,230 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 58,220 | +21 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 58,199 | +51 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 58,148 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 58,156 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (7 December 2025 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 583,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
eng foydali ixtirolar oldindan ma'lum bo'lmaydi. oldindan kutilganida, ularni kashf qilib bo'lishar edi. ishxonamizda kutilmagan odamlar yulduz(kuchli) bo'lib chiqadi. yulduz bo'lishi oldindan ma'lum bo'lganida, ular bizgacha yetib kelmas edi. hayotimizdagi katta musibatlar kutilmagan joydan (va vaqtda) keladi. kutilganida, musibatning zarbasi katta bo'lmas edi. bilganlarimizning aksar qismini ham kutilmagan joyda…
kibr tashqaridan kelgan fidbekni qabul qildirmaydi. fidbek kelmasa, o’zgarish kelmaydi. o’zgaradigan dunyoda o’zgara olmaslik, o’yindan chiqishga sabab bo’ladi. shuning uchun ham: rahbarni ulug’lash va u bilan bahslashmaslik – cho’kayotgan ishxonaning belgisi anchadan beri uzr so’ralmagan xonadon – baxtsiz oilaning belgisi kamchiliklar gaplashilmagan do’stlik – vaqtinchalik munosabat belgisi
fikrlarimizni yozmaguncha, sayoz tafakkurimizni ko‘rmaymiz. taymer bilan hisoblamaguncha, bekor yurganimizni bilmaymiz. eski rasmlarimizga qaramaguncha, qariganimizni sezmaymiz. xarajatlarimizni kiritmaguncha, o‘zimizni tejamkor hisoblaymiz. niyatlarimizni tahlil qilmaguncha, “yaxshi odamman” deb o‘ylaymiz. o'zgarish "o'lchash"dan boshlanadi.
double benefit ko‘proq ishlagan ham ko‘proq topadi, ham pul ishlatishga kamroq vaqti qoladi. kamroq yegan ham yeyishdan, ham hammomga qatnashdan vaqt tejaydi. instagramga kirmagan ham vaqti ortib qoladi, ham behuda istaklari kamayib ketadi.
mas’uliyatiga qarab uch xil xodimlarni ko‘rdim. 1. topshirilgan ishni to‘liq bajarmaydi. bo‘shab ketmaslik darajasida ishlaydi. bozor kadrga och bo‘lgan sohalarda uni rostdan ham bo‘shatib yuborishmaydi. “yo‘qdan ko‘ra”. 2. topshirilgan ishni to‘liq bajaradi. natijada bitta shirkatda yillab ishlaydi. bozorda ham doim ish topa oladi. 3. topshirilgan ishlardan tashqari, aytilmagan (lekin foydali bo‘lgan) ishlarni ha…
raqamli dunyomizga moslashgan maqollar: kuzatadigan beshta blogingni o'rtachasisan. instagramga yaqin yursang, istaklaring ko'payadi. brauzer(yoki gpt) tarixingni ko'rsat, kimligingni aytaman. do'st blog(fikr)ingga qarab, dushman instagram akkaunting (ya'ni ko'rinishing)ga qarab muomala qiladi. yaxshi qiz blogidan tashqariga chiqmaydi. yigit kishiga 40ta app kam. akkauntingdagi kabi bo'l, yoki akkauntingni asl…
mahsulot o’zgarishi uchun moddaning hammasi emas, bir qismi o’zgarishi ham yetarli bo’lishi mumkin. sut qatiqqa aylanishi uchun bir necha tomchi achitqi yetadi. mevali suvlarning aksarida sharbat yoki meva hidi 1% bo’ladi. xuddi shu tartibni odamlarda ham ko’ramiz. Prays-Lotka qonuniga ko'ra, sohadagi asosiy yangiliklarni bir nechtagina olim olib keladi. Dyurantlar yozadi: xalqni kam sonli avliyolar o’zgartiradi…
chanqoqning cho‘qqisi suvni rohatli qiladi ochlikning cho‘zilishi ovqatni shirin qiladi mehnatda charchash damda vijdonni tinch qo‘yadi yolg‘onsiz pul topish uyquni xotirjam qiladi uzoq muddatda erishish yutuqni qadrli qiladi hissiyotlarni tashqaridan qidiramiz asli ularning manbasi ichimizda bo‘ladi
Yarim doim ham o‘rtada emas. 70 yillik umrning yarmi 21 yoshda o‘tib ketgandek tuyuladi. Ishning yarim qiyinchiligi o‘rtasida emas, boshlab olishda bo‘ladi. 400 betlik kitobning yarim foydasi ilk 50 betida bo‘ladi. Million yig‘ishning yarim qiyinchiligi ilk 50-100k da bo‘ladi. Kunning yarmi peshinda emas, tonggi 9-10 larda o‘tib ketadi.
via negativa aqlli gap aytgan emas, ahmoqona gap aytmaydigangina - oqil. adolat qilib turadigan emas, adolatsizlik qilmaydigangina - odil. ilmdan gapiradigan emas, ilmsiz gapirmaydigangina - olim. rost gaplari ko’p bo’lgan emas, yolg’onlari yo’q odamgina - rostgo’y.
Mandat javoblari chiqdi. Talaba bo‘lganlarning ba’zilari hamma ishni tashlab o‘qiganlari yaxshi. Boshqalari esa, universitetga qatnab tursalar ham yetadi. Yana boshqalari esa, kirgan bo‘lsalar ham, o‘qishni davom ettirishmasa yutishadi. Bizga shularning qaysi biri mosroqligini bilish, Mandatdan keyingi hayot, Talabalik nasib qilmaganlarning yo‘l xaritasi va boshqa mavzular haqida do‘stlarimiz Abdusattor va Tem…
Yana bir o‘quv yili tugadi. Maktabimiz natijalari bilan bo‘lishamiz. Hozircha bitiruvchilarimizning 94 foizi talaba bo‘ldi. Lekin, faqatgina talaba bo‘lish bilan hozir kimni hayron qoldira olasiz? 104 ta bitiruvchimizdan: 28 tasi 100 foizlik (upd: 37ta bo'ldi) 44 tasi 50+ foizlik 10 tasi qisman grant bilan talaba bo‘lishdi. Qolganlari shartnomaga kirdi yoki javobini kutyapmiz. 104 ta bitiruvchimizning 99 tas…
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @azizrakhimov_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@azizrakhimov_blog edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 75 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 97 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@azizrakhimov_blog named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aziz Rahimov” (@azizrakhimov_blog), 59,831 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azizrakhimov_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.