Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Botir Ziyatov

Channel

Botir Ziyatov

@botirziyatov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,349subscribers

-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001351304253
TypeChannel
Username@botirziyatov
DescriptionShaxsiy blog va texnologiyalar haqida Hamkorlik: @giglink_admin
Created15 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/botirziyatov

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3498,4398,3946 August 2026 — 8,381 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,381 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,377 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,388 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,402 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,419 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,429 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,417 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,409 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,416 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,405 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,428 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,404 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,412 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,408 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,439 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,415 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,396 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,385 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,387 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,389 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,385 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,382 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,370 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,350 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,349 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 90 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,336–8,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 21:398,349-1
2 Nov 2026, 01:388,350-20
29 Oct 2026, 23:278,370-12
26 Oct 2026, 18:208,382-3
23 Oct 2026, 16:368,385-4
20 Oct 2026, 10:268,389+2
17 Oct 2026, 14:298,387+2
14 Oct 2026, 23:318,385-11
11 Oct 2026, 20:588,396-19
5 Oct 2026, 01:198,415-24
25 Sept 2026, 20:178,439+31
17 Sept 2026, 02:428,408-4
13 Sept 2026, 14:178,412+8
10 Sept 2026, 03:578,404-24
4 Sept 2026, 21:158,428+23
1 Sept 2026, 15:388,405-11
29 Aug 2026, 06:358,416+7
25 Aug 2026, 21:578,409-8
22 Aug 2026, 23:178,417-12
19 Aug 2026, 17:448,429first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.4%
avg views ÷ 8,349 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,880
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held59 (6 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total34,890
Reactions total591
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
618
Videos
106
Links
709

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,094 reactions across 59 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,85345.3%
😁79519.4%
💯58414.3%
😢2385.81%
🔥2265.52%
🫡1373.35%
👏852.08%
😱621.51%
🆒571.39%
🕊330.806%
🤔120.293%
🏆70.171%
👎50.122%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,094 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 59 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @botirziyatov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC≈1,590 views81 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Oldingi paytlar esimga tushib ketdi. Bitta funksiyani ishlatolmay kechasi bilan o‘tirardim. Kod to‘la breakpoint, qadam-qadam yuraman, kodga qarayverib ko‘z tinib ketardi. Stulga yopishib qolardim. Yechim topilsa, qiyinchiliklar darrov esdan chiqardi Hozir ham stulda o‘tiribman, lekin boshqacha. Qo‘lda telefon, agentlarga "ishla" deb push qilib turaman. @botirziyatov

😁70👍3💯3😢3👎1👏1

5 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,780 views119 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Hozir ishda qiziq bir holat bo‘lyapti. Ko‘p ishni Claude Code bilan qilaman. Ishlar ko‘p, hammasini eslab qolib bo‘lmaydi, ayniqsa oxirgi qilinganlarini. Kimdir "bu nima edi?" deb so‘rasa, darrov ayta olmayman. Claude'dan so‘rayman, javobini unga yuboraman. So‘ragan odam esa mening javobimni o‘z AI'siga tashlaydi. Uning AI'si ba'zida "rahmat" deydi, ba'zida shubha topib yangi savol beradi. Savol yana manga keladi,…

😁103👍9💯7

3 Nov 2026, 14:27 UTC≈2,230 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Analitiklar uchun ishda LLM va SI-agentlardan foydalanish Gipotezalarni tekshirish, maʼlumotlarni tayyorlash, hisobotlar tuzish, natijalarni talqin qilish... Avtomatlashtirish mumkin boʻlgan rutinaga qancha vaqt ketadi? AI Analytics Week intensivida LLM va SI-agentlar bu vazifalarni tezroq va sifat nazoratini yoʻqotmasdan hal qilishga qanday yordam berishini koʻrib chiqamiz. 2026-yil 23–27-noyabrda Yandex ekspertla…

🫡10👍3🆒1

3 Nov 2026, 04:41 UTC≈2,610 views67 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍44💯15🔥5😁2👏1

31 Oct 2026, 06:50 UTC≈3,700 views61 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁47👍7💯4😱3

25 Oct 2026, 15:38 UTC≈4,950 views82 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

💯55👍19👏5🏆2🔥1

25 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC≈6,660 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026

IFCB Shariat kengashi: Iman Invest'ga mablag‘ kiritish shariat nuqtai nazaridan tavsiya etilmaydi. Islom moliyasi bo‘yicha ilmli ulamolardan biri Mahmud Usmon IFCB Shariat kengashining xulosasini e'lon qildilar. Videoda aytilgan asosiy gaplar: - IFCB kengashi Iman Invest bilan hamkorlikni to‘xtatdi. - Kengash shu paytgacha kompaniya halolligi bo‘yicha yakuniy xulosa bermagan, faqat o‘rganib kelgan. - Iyul oyida…

😱46👍8😢4

21 Oct 2026, 04:50 UTC≈5,370 views49 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍37🔥8🕊2💯1🫡1

11 Oct 2026, 11:59 UTC≈6,000 views60 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Muammolar hech qachon tugamaydi, faqat o’zgaradi. Muhimi, sizda hozir qanaqa muammo borligi. muammolarni ham turi bor ekan: Past sifatli muammolar - faqat kuchingizni oladi. Ularni hal qilsangiz ham hech narsa yutmaysiz, ertaga yana shunga o’xshashi chiqadi. Yuqori sifatli muammolar - mustaqillik va kengayish hissini beradi, hal qilsangiz o‘sib borasiz Oylik va lavozim qachon oshishini kutish ham, yangi loyihani…

👍45🔥8💯3👏2🫡2

29 Sept 2026, 04:16 UTC≈7,320 views132 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Har kuni shu gapni o‘zimga aytib turishim kerak: Hayotda orqada qolish degan narsa yo‘q, chunki biz hech kim bilan poyga qilayotganimiz yo‘q @botirziyatov

💯86👍30🔥13🕊2🆒1

27 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC≈7,150 views92 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Yana bir ajoyib gap : Mening kuchim hech narsani mukammal qila olmasligimda. @botirziyatov

💯62👍14😁8🕊4🔥2🤔2

27 Sept 2026, 12:44 UTC≈6,760 views49 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍40👏4😱3🔥1🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @botirziyatov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Saud Abdulwahed
@saudabdulwahed · 18,994
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 October 2026
Azimjon's Fikrlog
@fikrlog · 19,729
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 September 2026
IT Masters
@ITMastersUz · 35,782
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
AI | DigiTech
@DigiTechAI · 51,847
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 August 2026
Yetim dasturchi kundaligi
@yetimdasturchi · 32,399
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Najot Ta'lim
@najottalim · 41,090
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
Foydali Moliya
@foydali_moliya · 50,613
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
Ustoz AI
@ustozai · 45,970
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Abdusattor
@abdusattor · 58,067
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Nizamoff
@nizamoff · 43,501
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 September 2026
Telegraph Uzbekistan
@TGraphUz · 39,206
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026
TATU | Rasmiy kanali
@tuituz_official · 35,439
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Aziz Rahimov
@azizrakhimov_blog · 59,971
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Shaha Dolimov
@shahadolimov · 19,955
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
Englify
@englifyschool · 55,944
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
UzDev Jobs – IT Jobs
@uzdev_jobs · 26,190
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Bek Olimjon
@DrBekOlimjon · 29,321
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
TATU | Ma'naviyat va ma'rifat markazi | Rasmiy kanal
@manaviyat_tuit_uz · 19,818
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
Mubosharat
@Mubosharat · 30,076
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 7 September 2026
Murphy by Mr.English
@MurphyMrENGLISH · 23,935
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
KINOCHi.net (Rasmiy)
@kinochi_net · 27,919
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 September 2026
ustozation
@ustozation · 35,648
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
Freelancer Uz 🌐
@freelancer_Uzbek · 21,954
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
MohirDev.uz
@mohirdev · 18,547
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Botir Ziyatov” (@botirziyatov), 8,349 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/botirziyatov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.