Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paiziev24

Channel

Paiziev24

@paiziev24

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,196subscribers

+120 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430610689
TypeChannel
Username@paiziev24
DescriptionAkmal Paiziev — MyTaxi, Express24, Workly, Maxtrack asoschisi va hozirda Numeo.ai ustida ishlayapman.
Created24 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/paiziev24

Growth

12,07612,20512,140.56 August 2026 — 12,076 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,096 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,123 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,124 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,158 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,183 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,205 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,194 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,196 subscribers12,1966 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +120. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,057–12,224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:1612,196+2
16 Aug 2026, 07:5612,194-11
14 Aug 2026, 18:2512,205+22
13 Aug 2026, 07:4412,183+25
12 Aug 2026, 08:3212,158+34
11 Aug 2026, 06:3112,124+1
10 Aug 2026, 03:1112,123+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:0212,122-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:1312,123+27
7 Aug 2026, 02:3112,096+20
6 Aug 2026, 03:1712,076first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.0%
avg views ÷ 12,196 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,320
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held40 (16 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total248,770
Reactions total3,507
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,030
Videos
232
Links
530

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 13s
Average length
1m 37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,934 reactions across 37 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,19730.4%
😁1,18030.0%
🔥46011.7%
41910.7%
💯2947.47%
852.16%
🤣571.45%
🤔421.07%
🥴370.941%
😢270.686%
❤‍🔥240.61%
👀150.381%
🤯140.356%
😐100.254%
👏90.229%
🤨90.229%
🥱90.229%
😭80.203%
😱70.178%
🆒50.127%
11 further kinds260.661%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,062reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 39 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @paiziev24. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈3,520 views86 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Kuch haqida post. @paiziev24

👍45😁23🤔6😐53👏21🕊1

15 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC≈4,020 views22 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Menga a16z’ning Travis Kalanickning yangi Atoms startapiga $1.7 milliard investitsiya kiritgani juda qiziq tuyuldi. Travisning bir nechta chiqishlarini ko‘rdim - gaplari juda falsafiy (balandparvoz). U oxirgi 8 yil davomida CloudKitchens, ya’ni industrial oshxonalar biznesi bilan shug‘ullanib kelayotgan edi. Endi esa birdaniga food yoniga mining va transportni ham qo‘shib, Atoms Food, Atoms Mining va Atoms Transport

👍1191😁1

14 Aug 2026, 21:29 UTC≈4,140 views141 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Toshkentdaligimda yangi qurilayotgan binolarni ko‘rib, ayniqsa Piramit Towerni, zamonaviy arxitektura haqida yozaman deb yurgandim, lekin qo‘lim tegmagan edi. Men magistraturani “Environmental Science” (Atrof-muhit ilmi) yo‘nalishida o‘qiganman. Bizga darslarda Sustainable Development (barqaror rivojlanish) tushunchasini ko‘p o‘rgatishgan. Zamonaviy katta oynali arxitektura bizning iqlimimizga mos kelmaydi. Qishda

👍10019💯11🔥10🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC≈3,910 views55 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Uyimizda Xfinity kompaniyasi internetidan foydalanamiz. Xfinity yaqindan boshlab wi-fi to’lqinlari orqali uyda kimdir bor yoki yo’qligini aniqlovchi servis taqdim etdi. Kamerasiz, faqat wi-fi radio to’lqinlari qaytishini o’zgarishini aniqlash hisobiga odam harakatini aniqlash texnologiyasi. Bu texnologiya xonaga kirmasdan turib, uning ichidagi harakatni radio to’lqinlari orqali ko’ra oladi. https://www.xfinity.com/

👍43😱64👏1🆒1

14 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈4,400 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Stop building AI apps. https://youtu.be/9uxGXRvH7IY @paiziev24

🔥172

13 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈4,630 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Numeo’da yangi pozitsiyalar ochildi. Topshirishga ulguring: https://numeo.ai/careers @paiziev24

11👍4

13 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈4,620 views71 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Limonlar bozori: nega dispetcherlikda rostgo‘y bo‘lish qiyin (AQSh logostikasi) 1970-yilda iqtisodchi George Akerlof “The Market for Lemons” degan maqola yozadi. G‘oya oddiy: sotuvchi mahsulotining sifatini biladi, xaridor esa bilmaydi. Masalan, yaxshi mashina $2,000, nosozi $1,000 turadi. Xaridor qaysi biri yaxshi ekanini ajrata olmagani uchun o‘rtacha $1,500 taklif qiladi. Natijada yaxshi mashina egasi bozorni ta

👍5510😁3🤣2💯1

11 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTCviews —

Paiziev24 pinned «🚀 Hiring — Software Engineer Numeo AI is redefining logistics in the US. We're building tech that powers supply chains at scale. Growing fast—really fast. Looking for people who thrive in high-intensity environments. Who we're looking for: • Deep technical…»

10 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC≈7,110 views226 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Yoshlar bilan suhbat: — UzAcceleratorga qabul qilindik! — So what? — Alchemist Silkroad’ga qabul qilindik! — So what? — Men O‘zbekiston va Qozog‘istondagi 3 ta venchur fonddan investitsiya oldim. — So what? — $10,000 MRR qilyapmiz. — So what? — 8 ta mijozimiz 5 oydan beri biz bilan. — Can you tell me more? @paiziev24

😁173🔥24💯128👍63

10 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC≈6,640 views58 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Startaplarni tashqaridan kuzatadigan odamlardan ko‘pincha: "Bu kompaniya yaxshi g‘oya topibdi, mahsulotni ishga tushiribdi va o‘zi yurib ketibdi", degan fikrlarni eshitaman. Aslida esa bunday emas. Biz avvalgi kompaniyalarimizda ham o‘zimiz bilmagan holda turli eksperimentlar o‘tkazib kelganmiz. Express24 davridan boshlab esa growth eksperimentlariga tizimli yondasha boshladik. Buni bizga Seedstars akseleratorida o‘

37🔥97👍4🦄1

10 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC≈6,570 views222 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Facebook eslatdi. 5 yil avval shu kuni biz velosipedda yetkazish uchun kur’erlarni tizimga qo’shgan edik. Undan avval ovqatlar faqat mashinada tashilar edi. Velosipedda tashish tan narhi arzon bo’lgani bilan unday kontseptsiya hali rivojlanmagan edi. Rivojlantirish uchun 300 ga yaqin velosipedlar sotib olib tarqatganmiz. Buyurtmalar avval velo kur’erlarga ko’rinadigan qilganmiz. Har bir yetkazib berish ustiga pul to

👍148🔥5316😁3👏1💯1

9 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC≈6,270 views185 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Toshkentda yosh dasturchilar bilan gaplashganimda qiziq bir fikr eshitdim. Yoshlar dasturlashda AI ishlatmaydigan tashkilotlarga ishga kirishni xohlamayotgan ekan. Agar davlat tashkilotlari va banklar o‘z siyosatini o‘zgartirmasa, kelajakda yaxshi xodimlarni topishga qiynalishi mumkin. Sababi yosh dasturchilar orasidagi xavotir bor, agar AI bilan ishlamaydigan tashkilotda bir necha yil ishlasam, ertaga u yerdan bo

👍110🔥30😁20💯164🤣3👨‍💻2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @paiziev24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,153 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Маргулан Сейсембай
@MargulanSeissembai · 211,394
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paiziev24” (@paiziev24), 12,196 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paiziev24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.