Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Muallim Muhammad

Channel

Muallim Muhammad

@MuallimMuhammad

Not marked by Telegram, checked 21 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,089subscribers

+4,029 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002182722487
TypeChannel
Username@MuallimMuhammad
Description“Zamonaviy pedagog” kursi hammuassisi Uralov Muhammad • Qanday qilib o’rgatishni o’rgataman. • Ta’lim, tarbiya va biz ta’sir o’tkaza oladigan omillar haqida gaplashamiz. • Kurslarimizda 1000+ ustozlar o’qib foyda olishdi. Admin: @MuhammadUralovv
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MuallimMuhammad

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10614,2907,1986 August 2026 — 9,060 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,060 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,056 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,997 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,977 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,971 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,953 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,884 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,859 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,968 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,947 subscribers2 September 2026 — 106 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,012 subscribers13 September 2026 — 112 subscribers27 September 2026 — 14,290 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,013 subscribers9 October 2026 — 13,860 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,726 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,676 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,657 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,625 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,582 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,546 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,523 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,477 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,432 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,400 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,369 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,342 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,330 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,321 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,303 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,272 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,248 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,225 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,197 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,165 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,144 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,116 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,089 subscribers13,0896 August 20265 November 2026
40 measurements spanning 91 days, net +4,029. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 20:5813,089-27
4 Nov 2026, 17:3513,116-28
3 Nov 2026, 14:2613,144-21
2 Nov 2026, 12:1113,165-32
1 Nov 2026, 10:5613,197-28
31 Oct 2026, 07:5013,225-23
30 Oct 2026, 10:0413,248-24
29 Oct 2026, 06:4913,272-31
28 Oct 2026, 07:1813,303-18
27 Oct 2026, 09:4613,321-9
26 Oct 2026, 10:5813,330-12
25 Oct 2026, 09:4413,342-27
24 Oct 2026, 09:5613,369-31
23 Oct 2026, 06:4513,400-32
22 Oct 2026, 09:0413,432-45
20 Oct 2026, 22:5113,477-46
19 Oct 2026, 22:1613,523-23
18 Oct 2026, 19:1813,546-36
17 Oct 2026, 20:5013,582-43
16 Oct 2026, 22:3113,625first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 13,089 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,950
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held59 (26 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total75,140
Reactions total1,161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
66
Videos
43
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
39m 43s
Average length
9m 56s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,217 reactions across 58 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,43834.1%
🔥96823.0%
👍72217.1%
💯3959.37%
😁3047.21%
⚡1994.72%
🤣1754.15%
🤔160.379%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,217 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 58 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MuallimMuhammad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (31.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,180 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

⚡7❤4🔥4

5 Nov 2026, 05:49 UTC≈1,330 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ustozim va tog’am Shohrux Tursunmurodov milliy sertifikatga tayyorlanadigan va tayyorlaydiganlar uchun qo’llanma tayyorlabdilar. O’zim o’qib ko’rmadim, lekin 10 yildan oshiq tajribalari, men va men kabi minglab odamlarni o’qishga kirishiga sababchi bo’lganlaridan bilaman-ki ona-tili, adabiyot ustozlari uchun foydali bo’ladi.

🔥13👍8⚡7❤4

5 Nov 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,330 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 📚 “Badiiyat kaliti” 36 asar — 36 sirli olam sari! Adabiyot olamiga chuqurroq kirib borish, asarlarning mazmun-mohiyatini anglash va badiiy tahlil sirlarini o‘rganishni istaganlar uchun ajoyib qo‘llanma! Kitobda: ✅ Syujet va kompozitsiya ✅ Obrazlar tizimi ✅ Asarlarning g‘oyaviy-badiiy talqini Ushbu qo‘llanma milliy sertifikat imtihoniga tayyorlanayotganlar uchun ham foydali manba bo‘la oladi.…

❤4🔥3⚡2👍2

2 Nov 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,270 views94 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Bizda qachon mutaxassislar ko’payadi? Bir do’stim aytyapti, bir ustaga 2-3 marta bir xil narsani tuzatishga olib bordim. Har safar pul oladi, lekin ishi sifatli emas, qayta-qayta muammo bo’laveradi, dedi. Men: “Bir narsani 2-3 marta tuzattirgan bo’lsang, keyingilarida pul bermasdan, ‘Qilgan ishingiz sifatsiz chiqdi, shuni tuzatib bering’ deb qattiqroq talab qildingmi?” desam. “Yo’q, bunga asabimni ketkazmadim, mayl…

❤42💯28👍14🔥10

31 Oct 2026, 16:07 UTC≈3,050 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Bugun zamonaviy pedagog kursimizda offline darsimiz bo’lib o’tdi. Ustozlar bilan amaliyot darsi qildik. Karyerada o’sish va daromadni oshirish haqida gaplashdik. Shunday qilib darsimizni 6-darsi ham tugatib oldik. Bugun ham Mudarris maktabimizda ham kursimizda dars o’tib haftani yakunlab oldim.

❤39🔥8⚡4

28 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈4,380 views118 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Nomsiz post Qishloqqa kelsam o’zimni yomon his qila boshlayman oxirgi vaqtlar, yoshligimda eng sevimli joyim hozir o’zgargandek. Sababini o’ylab ko’rsam, joy emas men o’zgarganman. Ulg’ayibman! Bu yerda maqsadsizman, foydasizman. Hamma dalada, fermada foydali ishlar bilan band. Men esa shunchaki yuraman. Bu yerda qo’limdan bir ish kelmaydi. Eng yoqtirgan joyim maktab. Bolalarga ilm berayotganimdan, foydali inson b…

❤74👍22💯14⚡8

27 Oct 2026, 10:52 UTC≈4,630 views51 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Zulfiya opa bilan podcast kecha chiqdi. O’zim olgan eng zo’rlaridan biri bo’ldi shubhasiz. Bir kunda 4 ming odam ko’rib bo’libdi. Sizni ham taklif etamiz👇 Link: https://youtu.be/jUtP63hrT14?si=X5hYe1VTldotH4TL @MuallimMuhammad

🔥25❤14👍10⚡2

27 Oct 2026, 08:39 UTC≈5,020 views127 reactionsread 6 November 2026

O’yinlar o’ynamang Nobel, Oscar, Oltin to‘p, maktabning eng sevimli o‘qituvchisi — ajoyib mukofotlar. Insonlarni ruhlantiradi, o‘z ustida ishlashga undaydi. Ammo har bir mukofot manipulyatsiya qiladi, o‘z qolipiga solishga, insonlarni jamiyat fikriga moslashishga va ba’zan qadriyatlarini o‘zgartirishga majbur qiladi. Yuqoridagi mukofotlarni yutmoqchi bo‘lganlar Falastin-Isroil mojarosi, Xitoydagi uyg‘urlar qirg‘in…

🔥73❤25⚡11💯11👍6🤔1

25 Oct 2026, 16:44 UTC≈6,630 views114 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Meni oxirgi vaqtlarda o’ylantirayotgan savollar Oradan 10-15 yillar o’tib hozir o’qitayotgan o’quvchilarimizni ko’chada ko’rib qolsak. Bemalol, xijolat bo’lmasdan, vijdon qiynalmasdan gaplasha olamizmi? Ularning oldida yuzimiz yorug’ bo’ladigan darajada dars o’tyapmizmi? Darslarga tayyorlanib boryapmizmi? Tushunishga harakat qilyapmizmi? Agar ularning ichida yaxshi o’qituvchilari chiqsachi? Bizni yaxshi xotiralar …

💯59❤24👍16🔥13🤔2

21 Oct 2026, 15:34 UTC≈4,860 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Har doim kurslarimiz yakunlanganidan keyin kichik bir tadqiqot o'tkazamiz. Ya'ni bitiruvchilarimizdan kelganlaridagi holat va 2 oylik o'zgarishlar so'raladi. Dastur haqidagi ijobiy fikrlari va ularga yoqmagan jihatlarni ham bilish uchun so'rovnomalar tashkil qilamiz. Bu o'sishimiz, keyingi kurslarimizni puxtaroq tayyorlashimiz uchun judayam zarur. Xullas, yuqorida o'quvchilarimizning A va B nuqtalardagi o'zgarishla…

👍15🔥5⚡4❤3

21 Oct 2026, 08:14 UTC≈4,760 views98 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Obro'li ko’rinasiz Birinchi maqola yozganlarimda ingliz va rus tillaridagi so’zlarni qo’shishga harakat qilardim. Bu meni tashqaridan olifta (krutoy) ko’rsatadigandek tuyulardi. O’quvchilarimga tanqidiy fikrlashini oshirish uchun insho beraman, ichiga boshqa tillardagi so’zlarni ham yozishadi, nega deb so’rasam, chiroyliroq ko’rinadi ustoz deyishadi. Bunaqa insonlar ko’pmiz, 2-3 ta tilda gapirsak, yozsak, chet til…

⚡44❤33🔥10👍7💯4

20 Oct 2026, 15:00 UTC≈4,200 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Bugundan “Zamonaviy pedagog”da darslarni boshlaymiz. Qabul oxiriga kelganda so’rovlar judayam ko’payib ketdi. Hali aloqaga chiqolmagan 500+ ustozimiz bor. Agar sizga ham aloqaga chiqolmagan bo’lsak tashvishlanmang, qolib ketmaysiz. Nasib qilsa 2-3 kun ichida hamma bilan bog'lanib guruhlarga qo'shamiz. O'tkazib yuborgan darsingiz esa o'tib beriladi. Agar dasturdan bexabar qolgan bo'lsangiz, hozir ro'yxatdan o'ting…

🔥7❤5⚡1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @MuallimMuhammad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @MuallimMuhammad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
26 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ustoz Kundaligi
@Ustoz_kundaligi · 18,861
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 September 2026
Muhammad Ali | Rasmiy Blog
@Muhammadali_Eshonqulov · 56,363
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Aziz Rahimov
@azizrakhimov_blog · 59,971
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Muallim Muhammad” (@MuallimMuhammad), 13,089 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MuallimMuhammad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.