Channel
@xodimga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,456subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003002980010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xodimga |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xodimga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 1,456 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,460 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 1,457 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 1,455 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 1,455 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 February 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,150 |
| Reactions total | 51 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Aybdor qidirma. Mas’uliyatni bo‘yningga ol. Yaqinda intervyuda bir yigitdan oldingi ishidan ketish sababini so‘raganimda: - Oxirgi ish joyimdan ketishimga sabab - menejerim juda qattiq tanqid qilib, so‘kib bergani bo‘ldi. - Nima sababdan? - Ozgina vaqtga kechga qolganim uchun. - Birinchi marta kech qolishingga shunaqa so’kdimi? - Yo‘q, uchinchisi edi. - Birinichi ikkitasida nima degan? - Xonasiga chaqirib, chiroyli…
Kelishuv turlari Ish beruvchi va xodim o‘rtasidagi kelishuv - bu shunchaki gap yoki qog‘oz emas, bu ikkala tomonning bir-biriga bo‘lgan mas’uliyati. Uni qanaqa turlari bor? Asosiy 2ta turi haqida: 1. Vazifa kelishuvi: "Ish bitsa, tamom». Sen qancha vaqt ishlashing muhim emas, muhimi - sifatli natija. Xodim uchun: Sen o‘z vaqtingni o‘zing boshqarasan. Ishingni 2 soatda qilib tugatsang, qolgan vaqt seniki. 2. Vaqt …
Solishtirish tuzog‘i O’zingni boshqalar bilan solishtirish - bu komplekslar va ego o‘yini. O‘zingni o‘zing bilan solishtirish - bu o‘sish va taraqqiyot strategiyasi. 1. O’zingni boshqalar bilan solishtirish noto‘g‘ri. Chunki sen boshqalarning faqat «senga ko‘rinadigan natijasi"ni (sahna ortini bilmasdan) o‘z "ichki dunyoying" bilan solishtirasan. Bu adolatsiz kurash. Natijada: Boshqalardan yaxshiroq bo‘lsang - kek…
Muhim bo‘lmagan kasb yo‘q Ba'zan bir kasbni boshqasidan muhimroq deb baholaymiz. Masalan, «shifokorning xatosi odam hayotini hal qiladi» deymiz. Bu to‘g‘ri. Lekin bir oz chuqurroq o‘ylab ko‘rsak, deyarli har bir kasb odamlar hayotiga ta'sir qiladi. Masalan, avtobus haydovchisini olaylik. U faqat mashina boshqarmaydi. Uning e'tibori va mas'uliyati bir vaqtning o’zida 40-50 yo‘lovchining to’g’ridan to’g’ri hayoti bil…
Seni har safar qutqarishlari - seni o’sishdan to’xtatishlaridir. Ko‘pchiligimiz o‘z xatolarinimizni to‘g‘rilab beradigan, muammolarimizni yechib tashlaydigan odamlarni "do‘st" yoki "mehribon rahbar" deb o‘ylaymiz. Aslida esa, ular sening rivojlanishingni to‘sib turgan "to‘siq"lardir. Agar sen xato qilsang-u, kimdir uni doim to‘g‘rilab qo‘yaversa, seni o‘smasliging aniq. Nega? Chunki: • «Og‘riq» bo‘lmasa, xulosa yo…
Ishga kirish va topshirishdagi qo‘rquvlar: Sen yolg‘iz emassan Ish qidirish yoki yangi loyihaga o‘tish - bu qulaylik zonadan chiqib, noma’lumlikka qadam bosish. "Meni qabul qilisharmikan?", "Eplay olarmikanman?" degan savollar ich-etingni yeyishi tabiiy. Lekin eslab qol: ishga topshirish - bu faqatgina imtihon emas, bu hamkorlik taklifi. Nega qo‘rquvlaring asossiz? 1. "Rad etilish" qo‘rquvi. Rad etilish - bu seni …
Bu his hammamizga tanish. Bahslashayotgan paytingda qarshingdagi odamning mantiqsizligi seni hayratga soladi, g‘azabingni keltiradi va ich-ichingdan: «Nahotki shuni tushunish shunchalik qiyin bo‘lsa? oddiy narsa-ku» degan savol o‘tadi. Lekin shu o‘rinda to‘xtab, bir narsani eslab olish kerak: tushunmovchilik - bu ko‘pincha aql darajasidagi farq emas, balki "ko‘rish burchagi"dagi farqdir. Nega ular seni tushunmaya…
Bog’cha ochish bo’yicha savollar so’rab turishadi. Eng ko’p takrorlanadiganlarini yig’ib do’stimiz Jasurbek bilan darslik yozdik. Bog’cha ochmoqchi bo’lganlarga foydali bo’ladi. Ancha xatolardan saqlab qoladi.
Oxirgi paytlar bitta narsaga ko‘p duch kelyapman Xabar keladi: “Faylni jo’natib yuboring. Yig‘ilish nechida bo‘ladi? yoki yana nimadirlar. Oxirida: Assalomu alaykum.” Maqsad aytilib bo‘lingan. Oxirida salom qo‘shilgan. Bu menga: “tez-tez ishni aytib, oxirida: ie salom berish kerak a, kel mayli salom berib qo‘yaman” degandek his beradi. Do‘stim, qarshingdagi ham sen kabi odam. Robot emas. Uning ham: kayfiyati bo…
"Menga yetarli oylik to‘lashmayapti" Bu fikr miyangda aylana boshladimi, demak, sen "xavfli hudud"ga qadam qo‘yibsan. Nega xavfli? Chunki bu his insonni ich-etidan yeydi, ishga bo‘lgan g‘ayratini so‘ndiradi va oxir-oqibat uni "shunchaki oylik kutib o‘tiradigan robot"ga aylantiradi. Lekin kel, arazlashni chetga surib, vaziyatni tahlil qilamiz: 1. Bozordagi narxingni bilasanmi? Aytaylik, sen 5 million olyapsan va bu…
Qanday dam olsak, haqiqiy dam olamiz? Dam olish - bu shunchaki divanda yotish yoki yangi joylarga borib, rasmga tushish degani emas. Ba’zan sayohatdan qaytgach, odam ishdagidan ko‘ra ko‘proq charchaganini his qiladi. Dam olishdan keyin chindan tiklanish uchun amal qilishimiz kerak bo‘lgan 3 ta asosiy tamoyil bor ekan: 1. Maksimal darajada boshqalar uchun javobgarlikni unutish: Haqiqiy hordiq - qachonki sen hech ki…
#boshqaruvchiga Do‘stim, sen "Yong‘indan xabar beruvchi signalizatsiya" emassan!!! “Nega xatoga yo‘l qo‘yding?” “Hisobot nega kechikdi?” Agar seni xodimlaring bilan muloqoting faqat mana shunday gaplardan iborat bo‘lsa, to‘xta. Sen rahbar emassan, sen ular uchun shunchaki "yong‘in signalizatsiyasi"ga aylanib qolibsan. Ya’ni, faqat muammo chiqqandagina ovoz chiqaradigan apparatsan. Tushun. Agar xodimlaring seni te…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xodimga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 11,643 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Xodimga” (@xodimga), 1,456 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xodimga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.