Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -801. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,173–35,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:00
34,325
-84
17 Sept 2026, 01:39
34,409
-93
15 Sept 2026, 06:18
34,502
-42
13 Sept 2026, 16:18
34,544
-86
11 Sept 2026, 18:58
34,630
+20
9 Sept 2026, 08:57
34,610
-107
6 Sept 2026, 00:57
34,717
-67
3 Sept 2026, 23:02
34,784
-50
2 Sept 2026, 16:05
34,834
-21
1 Sept 2026, 15:13
34,855
-38
31 Aug 2026, 14:32
34,893
-29
30 Aug 2026, 13:16
34,922
-24
29 Aug 2026, 11:25
34,946
-35
28 Aug 2026, 09:03
34,981
-7
27 Aug 2026, 12:14
34,988
-16
26 Aug 2026, 11:34
35,004
-44
25 Aug 2026, 10:21
35,048
-37
24 Aug 2026, 09:54
35,085
-72
22 Aug 2026, 14:37
35,157
+36
21 Aug 2026, 08:08
35,121
first reading
Engagement
185 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 34,325 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,700
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 185 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
185 (27 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
403,370
Reactions total
9,866
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 05:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,590
Videos
≈451
Links
≈255
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 30m
Average length
5m 02s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,725 reactions across 184 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,904
59.4%
🤣
2,240
10.3%
🔥
1,652
7.60%
❤🔥
1,561
7.19%
🙏
604
2.78%
🤩
495
2.28%
👍
355
1.63%
💘
322
1.48%
🎉
251
1.16%
💯
248
1.14%
😭
199
0.916%
🕊
143
0.658%
😍
139
0.64%
🤓
120
0.552%
⚡
113
0.52%
💔
57
0.262%
🆒
41
0.189%
😘
41
0.189%
😎
37
0.17%
🙈
37
0.17%
10 further kinds
166
0.764%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 184 of the 185 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,725 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 185 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
47
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 184 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @barnomukimova_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 185 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Yaqinda bir hamkasbim so'radilar
Ilgari faqat IELTS edi endi shukr haqida gapiryapsiz deb...
Shogirdlarimi hozir kursam tanimayman- bo'yligi cho'zilgan, oilali bola-chaqali, katta lavozimlarda ishlashyapti
Vaqt o'tadi, talabalar katta bo'ladi. Ustoz katta bo'ladi, endi shogirdlarim yosh bolalar emas... meni kuzatadiganlarni 90% 25+, ular uje katta insonlar
Men ham endi faqat IELTS dan dars beruvchi inson emasman…
Ko'zi ko'radigan shogirdlarim endi motivatsiya so'rasa so'kvorsam hafa bo'mela
Qanchali noshukrmiz
Motivatsiya sizi sog' ekanligiz, qogan hamasi 100% etoliman- b a h o n a
Dangasa bo'lib o'tirmoqchi bo'lsangiz marhamat
Lekin bahona qimela, vaqtim yo'q bahona, qilomayoman bahona, bolam borde bahona, ishim borde bahona
Hursand bo'ling- farzandiz bor, nechta odam bolaga zor, hursand bo'ling ishingiz bor, nechta inso…
Nechta ko'zi ojiz inson
Uzbekistonda IELTS topshirgan deb o'ylaysiz?
Ularni o'quv qo'llanmasi qanday bo'ladi?
Qay uslubda o'rganishadi?
Men ham AIFU dan (men ishlaydigan University) bunday savollar haqida o'ylab ko'rmagan edim....
Hullas Salima Ona somsalari nomer Adin
All roads lead to Mum🤍
Bugun 2 hafta deganda endi dam oldim🤝
Reklama at dushi, mahalamizi boshidagi joy, ayniqsa qovoq somsasi zor
Showing the 12 most recent of 185 posts we hold for @barnomukimova_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Linguabarno @linguabarno · 57,834 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
Muxtasar | ENGLISH @muxtasar_english · 61,405 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
Englify @englifyschool · 54,686 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Shoxruxbek Olimov @shoxruxbekolimov · 47,043 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
IELTS ZONE 9.0 @ieltszone_uz · 43,422 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Anvarov’s blog @anvarovsblog · 43,398 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
Multi-Level Record (C2 Level Teacher) @MultiLevelRecord · 206,618 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
Abdurazzoq | Archive @Abdurazzoq_IELTS · 25,480 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
ARTICLES 365 | Muratovich @articles365 · 85,063 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Speaking for IELTS | Lifestyle @Khusan57 · 98,973 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Dietolog Tursunboyeva🌿 @dietolog_tursunboyeva · 279,159 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
Mustafa | Study More 🇬🇧 @Ieltswithmustaffa · 61,954 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 August 2026
Ibragim Mansurov @ibragimmansurov_blog · 60,135 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
ustozation @ustozation · 36,501 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
Murphy by Mr.English @MurphyMrENGLISH · 24,025 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Jakhongir IELTS 9.0 💊 @jakhongir_ielts_9 · 41,756 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
BM | IELTS 9.0 @BekzodMirahmedov · 43,728 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog @otaboyevblog · 37,254 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
MULTILEVEL ZONE @Multilevel_zone · 185,925 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 25 August 2026
Sirojiddin's blog @RS_IELTS · 102,101 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 16 August 2026
Recent MultiLevel @RecentMultiLevel · 27,338 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
LINK @aslanovs_library · 16 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Thematic IELTS Listening Tests™ @ielts_thematic_tests · 62,551 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
Teacher Sardor | Writing 8.5 (T2) @teacheersardor · 21,392 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 80 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Barno Mukimova Official” (@barnomukimova_official), 34,325 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barnomukimova_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.