Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ravshan Komilovich

Channel

Ravshan Komilovich

@ravshan_komilovich

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,458subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001834510663
TypeChannel
Username@ravshan_komilovich
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ravshan_komilovich

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4511,4731,4627 August 2026 — 1,451 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,451 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,454 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,458 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,453 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,462 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,472 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,473 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,464 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,462 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,458 subscribers1,4587 August 202612 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 36 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,448–1,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 07:591,458-4
8 Sept 2026, 05:391,462-2
2 Sept 2026, 18:171,464-9
30 Aug 2026, 14:131,473+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:451,472+10
20 Aug 2026, 20:321,462+9
17 Aug 2026, 16:081,453-5
14 Aug 2026, 06:491,458+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:201,454+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:451,451no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:331,451first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 14 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ravshan_komilovich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC185 viewsread 7 August 2026

Baxt nimada oʻlchanyapti? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi postlar bilanmi? Har bir yaxshi narsani ommaga ko’rsatish majburiyat emas. Ba’zi narsalar shaxsiyligicha qolgani qadrlidir. Muammo baxtli vaziyatni ulashishda emas, balki uni boshqalarga nimanidir isbotlash uchun ulashishda. Baxt isbot talab qilmaydi. Lekin uni boshqalar bilan bo’lishish ham uni soxtalashtirmaydi. Muhimi nima uchun ulashayotganing. Agar “haqiqatan

5 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC334 viewsread 7 August 2026

Shaxsiyatingiz kuchsiz boʻlsa gpt yozib bergan ssenariy bilan “shaxsiy brend qurib” uzoqqa bora olmaysiz. Xuddi shunday marketologlarga ham. Shaxsiyati kuchsiz boʻlgan insonlarni loyihasini olsangiz, zerikarli va bosimi kuchli, natija chiqarishingiz qiyin boʻladi.

5 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC390 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gapini isbotlash uchun boshqa bir insonning gapirgan gapini ko'rsatib "mana, qara men nima degandim", demasdan o'zingizni fikringizni to'g'ri ifodalashni o'rganing.

4 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC463 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2021-yil aksessuar biznesini qilib koʻrgandim. Lekin doimgidek boshlab oxirigacha olib ketolmagandim. Nostalgiya…

3 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC519 views0 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Runnerlar klubiga 1-5 km yugurish uchun borish ahmoqlik. Shu vaqtgacha asosan bunday klublarda ko'rganim, 25 yoshdan past yoshdagilar borishadi ular bilan tanish-bilish bo'lishni esa foydasi yo'q. +30 yoshdagilar va hayotda rostan ham nimagadir erishgan, keyingi bosqichda shunchaki kayf uchun sport bilan shug'ullanadiganlar krugiga qo'shilaverish kerak, netvorking yaxshi ishlaydi.

3 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC547 views0 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Kechasi o'zingdan rozi bo'lib uxlashing uchun bu 3 ta narsani albatta bajar. 1. Kun davomida reja tuz va o'lib qolsang ham rejadagi ishlarni yopishga harakat qil. 2. Ertalab yoki kechasi hech bo'lmasa 1km yugur. 3. Kimgadir va'da bergan bo'lsang uni bajar.

2 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC670 views0 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Hech qachon kech emas. Sizni maʼlum bir qolipga solib qoʻymoqchi boʻlgan odamlarga quloq solmang... Oʻzingiz boʻling. Eshitmang. Men sal kam 2 yilimni atrofimdagi internetdagi turli xil odamlarni eshitish orqali sarf qildim, evaziga esa odamlarni eshitmaslikka faqat oʻzingni bilganingni qilib bilmagan joyingdagina kerakli narsani kerakli mutaxassisdan soʻrashni oʻrgandim. Chaynamang. Siz oʻzingizga raqobatchi qili

31 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTC747 viewsread 7 August 2026

Odamlar faqat uchta narsaga pul sarflashadi, faqatgina shu uchta. Birinchisi: bu yechim. Odamlar muammoni, ogʻriq, stress, qarzdorlik, yolgʻizlikni yoʻqotish uchun deyarli har qanday narsani toʻlashga tayyor. Shuning uchun ham odamlar shifokorga ikkilanmay pul toʻlashadi. Ikkinchisi: qulaylik. Dunyodagi eng boy kompaniyalar insonlarning ishini yengillashtirayotganlardir. Ular shunchaki nimadir narsani tezroq, s

27 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 7 August 2026

Qiziq tajriba 35 sekundgacha boʻlgan reelslarni ertalab 7-8 atrofida posting qilsangiz yaxshiroq ketadi +45 sekundlik videolarni esa kechasi 11 dan keyin qoʻsangiz yaxshi ketadi

26 Jul 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 7 August 2026

Kimdir, koʻp pul topish haqida gapiryaptimi shunchaki oʻtkazib yuboring. Bu shunchaki pulga muhtojlardan pul shilish varonkasini bir uchi. Siz usha varonkaga ilinib qolmang. Haqiqiy mutaxassis koʻp pul topasan demaydi. U beradigan yagona narsa bu ishlatishingiz kerak boʻlgan instrumentlar. Siz koʻp pul topishni oʻrgatadigan “ekspertchalarni” emas, sohangizdagi oʻzingiz oqsoqlanib turgan jihatingizni kuchaytirishga

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ravshan_komilovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Asror Iskandarov | Shaxsiy Brend Qurish
@asroriskandarovshb · 23,668
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 September 2026
Abdusattor
@abdusattor · 59,489
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Aziz Rahimov
@azizrakhimov_blog · 59,831
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Ibrahim Gulyamov
@ibrahimGulyamov · 25,582
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Звуки для видео
@sounds_pack · 25,742
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
Rizqim.uz
@rizqimuz · 24,040
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 September 2026
Ishcom | Vakansiyalar
@ishcomuz · 36,742
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
Alisher Isaev blogi
@AlisherIsaev_blogi · 42,346
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Ustoz AI
@ustozai · 54,465
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Freelancer Uz 🌐
@freelancer_Uzbek · 21,523
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
Najot Ta'lim
@najottalim · 39,531
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ravshan Komilovich” (@ravshan_komilovich), 1,458 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ravshan_komilovich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.