5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,272–1,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 18:28
1,274
+1
13 Aug 2026, 09:59
1,273
-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:04
1,276
-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:16
1,278
+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:46
1,275
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
46.0%
avg views ÷ 1,274 subscribers
Avg views / post
587
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
11 (25 May 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
1,760
Reactions total
81
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
280 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
121
43.2%
❤
80
28.6%
⚡
37
13.2%
🏆
12
4.29%
👍
11
3.93%
❤🔥
6
2.14%
🤔
5
1.79%
👎
4
1.43%
👏
2
0.714%
😁
2
0.714%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yakuniy natijani nima ta'minlaydi?
• Bilim?
• G'oya?
• 24/7 ishlash?
Oxirgi kunlardagi ba'zi voqealardan keyin o'ylab qoldim
Nega ba'zi insonlarda g'oya juda ko'p, bilimi ham ko'p, lekin 24/7 ishlasa ham natija bo'lmaydi, yoki tan olinmaydi
Aynan shu savolim bor insonlarni uzoq kuzatish davomida olgan javobim juda oddiyligidan o'zim ham hayron qoldim
Mani xulosam bitta:
Mas'uliyatni olishdan qo'radi, boshini bo…
G'oya muhimmi yoki realizatsiyami?
Menimcha ikkinchisi muhimroq
Ideasi yoq lekin mavjud ideani amalga oshiroladigan odam bir kun kelib qanday qilib idea qilishni o'rgana oladi
Lekin ideasi bor, ammo amalga oshirmaydigan odam harakatga o'tishni o'rganish ehtimoli juda kam
Nega? Chunki g'oya qilishda risk yoq, amaliyotda esa risk bor
Kimki qo'rquvlarni yengib mas'uliyatni ola bilsa harakatga o'ta oladi
Harakatdan…
Bu hayotda menimcha o’zi hayollarida yoshligida ekilgan orzu / tasavvur urug’larini parvarishlab, umri davomida o’stiradi
Siz ekkan ekiningiz hosili juda uzoq yillardan so’ng keladi
Shunday ekan miyangizga har xil urug’larni ekib tashlamang🫱🏼🫲🏽
Qanday urug’ miyangizga ekilganini kimga havas qilayotganingiz, qanday maqsad tomon harakatlanayotganingizdan tahmin qilsa bo’ladi
@nasullaevblog
Haqiqatni tan olish = Yangi imkoniyat
O'tgan haftada man o'zim uchun kashf qilgan yangi instrument - Haqiqatni tan olish
Aynan shu instrument bilan bugun yana bir yangi insight oldim.
Insightni bo'lishishdan oldin "Haqiqatni tan olish" deganda nimani tushunayotganimni qisqacha ochib bersam:
Haqiqatni tan olgan odam qo'rqmaydi, risk qiloladi, ishlaridagi sabablarni maksimumda qilib, yakuniy natijani egasiga qo'yib…
🌊 Dengiz qancha chuqur bo'lsa u shuncha sokin bo'ladi
Inson qancha oqil bo'lsa shuncha bosiq bo'ladi
Og'ir, noqulay va stressli momentlarda insonlar o'zlarini qanday tutishlariga e'tibor qarating - bu ularning asl holatlari
Istalgan odam hammasi yaxshi va ularga mos bo'lgan holda o'zlarini yaxshi tuta olishadi
Og'ir vaziyat esa emotsiyalarni tizgindan chiqaradi, o'z-o'zini nazorat qilishga majbur qiladi
@nasulla…
May oyi eng band va samarali oylardan bo’ldi
1. Oyni Yangi O’zbekiston obyekti uchun online taqdimotdan boshladik
2. 4-may kuni esa Bosh Vazir va Savdo Sanoat Palatasi bilan birgalikda HongKong safariga ketdik
3. 7-may kuni Guanjouda safarimiz davom etdi va 11-may kuni Toshkentga qaytdik
4. 12-22 may kunlari China Housening yangi yirik loyihasi ustida jamoa bilan intensiv ishladik.
5. 23-26 may kunlari Navoiy safari…
⏰ Soat tungi 00:05
📆 28-maydan 29-mayga o’tish kechasi
Davlat 5 kunlik dam olish e’lon qilgan
2021-yildan beri o’z vaqtimni o’zim nazorat qiloladigan imkoniyatga egaman, lekin shunga qaramay hayotimning 80% qismi shu ko’rinishda o’tib keladi
Eng qizig’i, men tanigan o’nlab millionerlarning deyarli hammasi xuddi shu vaqtda aloqaga chiqsangiz ham siz bilan gaplashishadi (uyqusiragan ovozda emas!)
📌 Muhim to’ldiris…
Chumchuq inida ko'rganini qiladi
Bola uyida ko'rganini qiladi
Xodim rahbarida ko'rganini qiladi
Rahbar esa o'ziga o'xshagan xodim oladi
Atrofimizdagi hamma narsa aslida bizning ichki olamimizning aksi
Juda kichik qismi esa maqsadlarimiz yo'lida yengishimiz kerak bo'lgan muammolar
Muammolar aslida hayotimizning juda kichik foizini tashkil qiladi, ularga emotsional tus berish orqali ahamiyatini oshirib yuboramiz …
Keladigan keladi, ketadigan ketadi - 24 soat ichida bo’lgan 2 hayotiy voqea
24-may. Oilamizda to’y bo’ldi. To’yning yugur yugurlari bilan charchaganimiz aniq. Tungi soat 22:00 dan oshgandi.
Cho’ntagimdan pullarim tushib qolganini sezdim. Ular yo’qolganiga ichimdan 90% ga ishonib bo’lganman. Lekin baribir qidirdim. Aniqki topolmadim…
Ichimdagi bir fikr tinchlik bermayapti: “Halol bo’lsa topiladi…”
Pulim halol ekan…
❤31🔥14🤔4⚡3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nasullaevblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,448,666 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abdullo Nasullayev” (@nasullaevblog), 1,274 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasullaevblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.