Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,318–9,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 20:58
9,447
+4
13 Sept 2026, 02:19
9,443
+20
9 Sept 2026, 10:55
9,423
-11
4 Sept 2026, 09:56
9,434
+24
1 Sept 2026, 07:13
9,410
-2
28 Aug 2026, 23:16
9,412
+72
26 Aug 2026, 00:16
9,340
+5
23 Aug 2026, 01:51
9,335
-17
19 Aug 2026, 06:52
9,352
-9
16 Aug 2026, 16:22
9,361
-9
13 Aug 2026, 05:47
9,370
-11
10 Aug 2026, 02:52
9,381
+3
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
9,378
-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:15
9,381
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:42
9,381
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
56.6%
avg views ÷ 9,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,350
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
22 (28 December 2025 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
5,350
Reactions total
322
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5,268 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,544
29.3%
👍
1,235
23.4%
😁
1,127
21.4%
❤
401
7.61%
🤣
301
5.71%
⚡
146
2.77%
💯
141
2.68%
😢
131
2.49%
❤🔥
81
1.54%
🤯
33
0.626%
🍾
25
0.475%
👏
24
0.456%
🤩
22
0.418%
💔
14
0.266%
🍌
13
0.247%
🏆
10
0.19%
🌚
8
0.152%
🤔
6
0.114%
😱
3
0.057%
👌
2
0.038%
1 further kind
1
0.019%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 22 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jakhonrakhmonov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 December 2025 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Dasturchi sifatida tanlov qilish vaqti keldi
It is time to make a bet
Oxirgi bir necha yillarda dasturchilar hayoti tubdan o‘zgarib ketdi. Ishimizning kattagina qismini AI agentlar qilib bermoqda. Biz kundalik qiladigan ish esa shu AI agentlar bilan gaplashish bo‘lib qoldi.
Bu esa quyidagi narsalarni keltirib chiqarmoqda:
1. Brainrot: dasturlash qobiliyatimiz kundan kunga yomonlashib bormoqda. Bu tabiiy. Biror ish…
Ish xonada eng muhim narsalardan biri bu hamkasblar o'rtasidagi muloqot va ishonch. Chunki katta va sifatli loyihalarni bir kishi qurmaydi. Jamoa quradi.
Agar siz hamkasbingiz yozgan gaplarni LLM ga tashlab, uning javobini hamkasbingizga yuborayotgan bo'lsangiz siz o'sha ishonchni buzayotgan bo'lasiz. Qo'shimchasiga bu narsa yaqqol ko'rinib turadi.
Bu esa yaxshilik bilan tugamaydi.
@jakhonrakhmonov
Google ga ishonib serverlarini ishlatsang-u tag-tugi bilan o‘chirib yuborsa
Australianing eng katta nafaqa fondlaridan biri bo‘lgan UniSuper kompaniyasi Google ning Private Cloud serverlaridan foydalanar ekan. Ya’ni o‘zlari uchun alohida muhit. Google ning boshqa mijozlari bu muhitni ishlata olmaydilar.
2024 chi yilda bir qiziq insident bo‘lib o‘tibdi. Milliardlab dollar boshqarib turgan UniSuper kompaniyasining mu…
Juda yomon ish qilib qo’ydim.
Bu vaziyatdan qanday chiqib ketishni bilmayapman.
Agar odamlar bilib qolsa nima deydi? Hamkasblarim bilsa nima deydi?
Managerim bilib qolsaku haydab yuborsa kerak.
Uyatdaman. Uydagilarga ham hali aytganim yo’q.
Ichimga sig’mayapti. Shuning uchun sizlar bilan bo’lishmasam bo’lmaydi.
Kecha….
Bir ishni qilish uchun….
Kodni o’z qo’llarim bilan yozdim 😱
AI ishlatmadim 😱
Endi oda…
Suniy intellektni yangi narsalar o'rganishda ko'p ishlatyapman ohirgi paytlar.
Ayniqsa Claude artifactlar yarata olgani uchun undan "custom tutorial" lar qilib berishini so'rayapman.
Odatda biror kishi blog post yoki tutorial yozganda siz, ya'ni reader, haqida hech qanday ma'lumotga ega emas. Tahmin qilishi mumkin holos.
U degani postlar/tutoriallar siz uchun to'g'ri kelmasligi mumkin. O'ta qiyin yoki o'ta oson bo…
Har bir dasturchi bilishi shart bo'lgan xavfsizlik asoslari.
Encryption, Hashing, TLS, etc.
Stream. 18:30 da.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsIyJPR-XFE
O'zbek dasturchilariga qiyin
Ko'pchiligimiz hammaga "ho'p aka, bo'ldi aka" deb o'rganib qolganmiz. "Yo'q" deyishga qiynalamiz. Men ham shunday bo'lganman.
Manager kelib "mana bu ishni qilib bera olasanmi?" desa "ha qilib beraman" deb ko'p aytar edim. "Qancha vaqt ketadi?" deb so'rasa 1 hafta deyishni o'rniga "2 kun ketadi aka" der edim.
Natijada nima bo'lgan? Charchab qolganman.
Hozir esa birinchi aytadigan gapim…
Urush va Amazon
Yaqin sharqda nimalar bo'layotganidan xabaringiz bor. Raketalar uyoqdan buyoqqa uchib yuribdi afsuski.
Ularning biri AWS ning bir data-centeriga ham yetib borgan ko'rinadi.
Eslatib o'tish kerak AWSda regionlar mavjud. Har bir region esa Availability Zone larga bo'lingan.
Aynan shu holatda biror bomba yoki raketa AWSning Middle East regionidagi mec1-az2 Availability Zone data-centeriga tushgan ko'r…
Nvidia da ish boshlaganimda jamoada AI skeptik lar ko‘p edi. Hozir esa ularning soni...
O‘tgan yilning Avgust oyida Nvidia da ish boshlaganimda jamoamizdagi eng tajribali dasturchilar orasida AI skeptiklar yetarlicha edi. Ularni Linkedinda kuzatar ekanman "AI instrumentlarni ishlatish yaxshilikka olib kelmaydi" degan ma’nodagi postlar yoki kommentlarni ko‘p ko‘rar edim.
Oradan mana yarim yildan sal ko‘proq vaqt o‘t…
Microsoft AI boshlig’i 1.5 yil ichida AI ko’pchilik, balki xatto barcha, white-collar ishlarini avtomatlashtiradi debdi yaqinda.
Bilmadim.
Yoki men qanaqadir bubble da yashayman yoki bular.
Balki men AI ga qiziqmaydigan joyda (Nvidia) ishlarman? Balki oldin ishlagan joylarim (AWS) AI ga qiziqmagan?
Ishimizni to'liq avtomatlashtirishga yaqin ham kelmagan bu instrumentlar.
@jakhonrakhmonov
🔴 Stream - 30 daqiqalardan so'ng 🔴
https://www.youtube.com/live/XnHCTB31nvg
Oldingi streamlarda "Claude Code" ga o'xshash "Shrek Code" agentini yozishni boshlagan edik.
Agentimiz fayllar bilan ishlashni biladi, kod yoza oladi. Lekin unda ichki "yashirin" ma'lumotlar haqida ma'lumot yo'q.
Bugun ichki ma'lumotlar bilan context qurib berishni, zamonaviy so'zlar bilan aytganda RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) qo…
🔥47👍14😁3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @jakhonrakhmonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Yetim dasturchi kundaligi @yetimdasturchi · 35,358 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Aziz Rahimov @azizrakhimov_blog · 59,831 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Abdusattor @abdusattor · 59,489 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Bek Olimjon @DrBekOlimjon · 28,760 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
ustozation @ustozation · 36,501 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
AI | DigiTech @DigiTechAI · 55,965 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 August 2026
IT Masters @ITMastersUz · 36,406 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Murphy by Mr.English @MurphyMrENGLISH · 24,025 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
Ustoz-Shogird @UstozShogird · 23,083 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
Muhammad Ali | Rasmiy Blog @Muhammadali_Eshonqulov · 58,024 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Kitob nuri @kitob_nuri · 28,734 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
UDEMY FREE ️| Coursevania @Udemy4 · 252,226 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 2 September 2026
. @MubashshirAhmad · 30,901 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Ingliz tilini o'rganamiz @ingliz_tiliuz · 32,419 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
TATU | Rasmiy kanali @tuituz_official · 36,567 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
ilmnuri | Расмий канал @ilmnuri · 51,378 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
Xayrulla HAMIDOV ijodi /official @Xayrulla_Hamidov_adabiyot · 28,739 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
Islom.uz @islomuz · 123,129 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
Najot Ta'lim @najottalim · 39,531 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
Joblink.uz | Vakansiya @joblinkuz · 23,905 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
UzAutoJobs | Бўш иш ўринлари (расмий) @uzautojobs_uz · 47,793 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
Audio kitob | Huda uz @audiokitoblar_islom · 54,210 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
Hasanxon Yahyo Abdulmajid | Rasmiy @hasanxondomlauz · 56,306 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Foydali Moliya @foydali_moliya · 53,015 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jakhongir Rakhmonov - IT” (@jakhonrakhmonov), 9,447 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jakhonrakhmonov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.