10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,405–30,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:37
30,460
+47
14 Aug 2026, 00:55
30,413
-14
12 Aug 2026, 17:33
30,427
-8
11 Aug 2026, 20:14
30,435
-6
10 Aug 2026, 20:23
30,441
-11
8 Aug 2026, 22:12
30,452
-16
7 Aug 2026, 20:15
30,468
+5
6 Aug 2026, 23:44
30,463
+32
6 Aug 2026, 10:01
30,431
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:53
30,431
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.5%
avg views ÷ 30,460 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,900
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
35 (30 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
484,770
Reactions total
10,601
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,601 reactions across 35 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
3,782
35.7%
❤
2,377
22.4%
🔥
1,961
18.5%
👍
1,697
16.0%
🙈
206
1.94%
😢
177
1.67%
❤🔥
107
1.01%
🤯
99
0.934%
🌚
41
0.387%
🥰
41
0.387%
🤔
35
0.33%
🎉
34
0.321%
😱
34
0.321%
😍
10
0.094%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,601reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 35 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mubosharat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ovqatlanish va jinsiy hayot
To‘g‘ri ovqatlanish jinsiy hayotga ta’sir qiladi. Chunki miyada rohatlanish uchun mas’ul bo‘lgan tizimlar bor va ular mazali ovqatdan olinadigan zavq bilan ham, jinsiy lazzat bilan ham bog‘liq ishlaydi.
Sog‘lom ovqatlanish organizmda energiyani oshiradi, kayfiyatni yaxshilaydi va gormonal muvozanatga ijobiy ta’sir qiladi. Natijada inson o‘zini yengilroq, faolroq va xotirjamroq his qiladi…
Erkaklar orgazmining sirlari
Erkaklar orgazm cho‘qqisiga chiqqan paytda o‘z his-tuyg‘ularini jilovlay olmaydi.
Yaqinlik paytida erkaklarning 94 foizida jarayonni yana bir bor takrorlash istagi bo‘ladi, ammo orgazmdan so‘ng bu xohish birdaniga yo‘qoladi.
Ajralib chiqadigan urug‘ (sperma) miqdori erkakning kayfiyatiga ham bog‘liq.
Yangi jinsiy aloqaga tayyor bo‘lish uchun organizmning tiklanishiga o‘rtacha 18 daqiq…
Yotoqda erkak kishining hech qachon oshkor qilmaydigan eng katta qo‘rquvi
Keling, har qanday kuchli erkak million dollarlik seyf kodi kabi sir tutadigan narsalar haqida gaplashamiz.
Ayollar erkaklarga har doim jangovar filmlardagi o‘ziga ishongan superqahramonlardek qarashga o‘rganishgan. Go‘yo biz har doim, har qanday vaziyatda jasorat ko‘rsatishga shaydek tuyulamiz.
Lekin bu shunchaki xomxayol.
Erkak kishining …
Amallab bolalarni uxlatib olgandan keyin yoki kechasi bir uyg'onib ketganingizda bolalar uxlaganini bilib qolgach, darhol juftingizni turtib, uni aloqaga chorlamang.
Avvalo o'zingiz tayyorlaning: qovuqni bo'shating, yuz-qo'lingizni yuving va hokazo. Keyin uning yoniga kelib, sekin o'pib, quchish bilan unda aloqaga rag'bat uyg'oting.
Albatta, u ham o'ziga kelib olgach, tayyorgarlik ko'rib oladi, bundan g'ashingiz ke…
Muammoning yechimi
Koʻpgina muammolar janjal qilishga arzimaydi. Oilada turli xil kelishmovchiliklar boʻlib turishi tabiiy hol. Er-xotin bir-birini yanada yaxshiroq oʻrganib, tushunishga harakat qilsa, janjallar ham kamayib boradi. Aksariyat muammolar oʻzaro suhbat orqali yechiladi, faqatgina ikkala tomon ham bir-birlarini hurmat qilgan holda, boshqalarni aralashtirmasdan gaplashib olishi lozim.
📚Gʻiyosiddin Yus…
Tez bo'shanishdan shifo topgan o'n nafar o'quvchining fikri:
1. Mingdan ming roziman.
2. Yanada yaxshiroq hayot kechirish...
3. Tabiiy davo.
4. O‘zim nazorat qilaman.
5. Urologga borib ham...
6. Hayotimda haqiqiy o‘zgarish bo‘ldi.
7. Yurgan ekanman-da...
8. Endi ishondim.
9. 7-8-kunlarda o‘zgarish boshlandi.
10. 2-3 taga quvvatim yetyapti.
#tez #TOP10
Mahsulot haqida batafsil
Xarid qilish
Rustamjon domla yozibdilar:
Bilib qo‘ygan yaxshi.
Hazrati Payg‘ambarimiz sollallohu alayhi vasallam ummat uchun ota o‘rnida bo‘lganlar, har narsaning odobi, haq-huquqini o‘rgatganlar, hatto hojat va to‘shak odobigacha, masalan:
«Sizlardan biringiz xotini bilan jinsiy yaqinlik qilsa, u (xotini) ham o‘z ehtiyojini qondirmaguncha shoshilib chetga chiqib ketmasin. O‘zi qanday qilib ehtiyojini qondirishni xohlasa, xotin…
Ayollar ayollarga ham ko‘rsatishi mumkin bo‘lmagan tana a'zolari bor — kindikdan tizzagacha. Yozda, issiqda bemalol bo‘lib qolmanglar deb eslatyapman.
Xuddi shuningdek, erkaklar ham ayni shu hududlarini erkag-u ayolga ko‘rsatmasligi kerak — o‘rtoqlar bilan dachaga chiqqanda, saunaga tushganda ham!
Er-xotin orasida esa chegara yo‘q — xohalagan joyni, xohlagancha ko‘ravering!
Uyda farzandlar katta-kichikligiga ko‘ra…
Agar erkak kishi ko’chaga chiqqanda har xil ovqatga ko’zi tushaversa, ayniqsa, mazali, chiroyli taomlar e’tiborini tortsa, ayoli pazanda bo’lishga majbur bo’ladi.
#tushungan_tushundi
@Mubosharat
O‘ZINGIZNI ERKIN HIS QILING
Ishdan, ko'chadan uyga kelganingizda «zirh»ingizni yechib qo'ying. Ishda qattiqqo'l rahbar yoki jiddiy xodim bo‘lishingiz bo‘lishingiz mumkin. Lekin uy — bu dam olish, yengillik, halovat maskani.
Turmush o'rtog'ingiz va bolalaringiz bilan munosabatda jiddiy bo'lib olmang, uncha-muncha gaplarning ostidan gap topishdan tiyiling. Yengil sanaydigan, kengbag'ir bo'ling. Hazil-huzul qiling. O'…
Kanalimizning sodiq obunachilari, muntazam kuzatuvchilariga ma'lumki, biz bir necha oydan beri ixtiyoriy xayriya tashkil qilib kelyapmiz. Bizni qo'llab-quvvatlayotgan barchaga tashakkur. Foydangizga guvohlik beraman, inshaalloh.
Tushgan pullar faqat haqdor oilalarga ro'zg'orlik, dori-darmon, kiyim-kechak kabi kamlar uchun yetkazilmoqda. Bunga shaxsan o'zim mas'ulman.
Ushbu xabarni ko'rgan har bir kishini kamida 10 …
❤64👍22🔥21🙈2🎉1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Mubosharat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 681,055 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
FATVO.UZ | Расмий канал @diniysavollar · 201,001 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
AlQuranuz-Shayx Alijon qori @alquranuz · 133,136 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Islom.uz @islomuz · 124,443 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mubosharat” (@Mubosharat), 30,460 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mubosharat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.