Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lily Aspen

Channel

Lily Aspen

@lilyAspen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

79,238subscribers

+453 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594888214
TypeChannel
Username@lilyAspen
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lilyAspen

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

78,48779,23878,862.57 August 2026 — 78,785 subscribers8 August 2026 — 78,789 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78,766 subscribers10 August 2026 — 78,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 78,654 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,655 subscribers13 August 2026 — 78,582 subscribers14 August 2026 — 78,542 subscribers16 August 2026 — 78,510 subscribers17 August 2026 — 78,487 subscribers18 August 2026 — 78,575 subscribers19 August 2026 — 78,670 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,673 subscribers21 August 2026 — 78,731 subscribers22 August 2026 — 78,792 subscribers24 August 2026 — 78,811 subscribers25 August 2026 — 78,815 subscribers26 August 2026 — 78,865 subscribers27 August 2026 — 78,906 subscribers28 August 2026 — 78,944 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78,985 subscribers30 August 2026 — 79,014 subscribers31 August 2026 — 79,037 subscribers1 September 2026 — 79,020 subscribers2 September 2026 — 79,057 subscribers3 September 2026 — 79,051 subscribers5 September 2026 — 79,191 subscribers8 September 2026 — 79,115 subscribers11 September 2026 — 79,111 subscribers13 September 2026 — 79,122 subscribers14 September 2026 — 79,211 subscribers16 September 2026 — 79,204 subscribers19 September 2026 — 79,227 subscribers25 September 2026 — 79,238 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +453. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,374–79,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 20:1979,238+11
19 Sept 2026, 07:2079,227+23
16 Sept 2026, 18:2279,204-7
14 Sept 2026, 23:4279,211+89
13 Sept 2026, 07:3879,122+11
11 Sept 2026, 13:1979,111-4
8 Sept 2026, 20:2079,115-76
5 Sept 2026, 15:3879,191+140
3 Sept 2026, 13:4179,051-6
2 Sept 2026, 10:1379,057+37
1 Sept 2026, 08:4479,020-17
31 Aug 2026, 10:0779,037+23
30 Aug 2026, 06:3679,014+29
29 Aug 2026, 09:4678,985+41
28 Aug 2026, 12:0678,944+38
27 Aug 2026, 12:4278,906+41
26 Aug 2026, 12:3478,865+50
25 Aug 2026, 13:3878,815+4
24 Aug 2026, 13:0378,811+19
22 Aug 2026, 23:3878,792first reading

Engagement

338 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.26%
avg views ÷ 79,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,760
218 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
244
of 338 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held338 (5 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total1,254,600
Reactions total27,971
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,910
Videos
≈468
Links
≈1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 16m
Average length
39m 33s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

42,258 reactions across 305 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19,54246.2%
❤‍🔥6,48415.3%
🔥6,12614.5%
😁3,9659.38%
💯1,8944.48%
👍1,0232.42%
😱7641.81%
🥰6271.48%
😢4471.06%
👀3590.85%
🗿2070.49%
🎉1870.443%
👏1850.438%
🤩1740.412%
🤯1280.303%
🤬650.154%
🌚640.151%
🤔170.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 306 of the 338 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 338 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
218
across the posts below
Posts paid on
65
of 306 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
104
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lilyAspen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 338 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 06:13 UTC≈4,310 views91 reactionsread 30 September 2026
File

Ребят, напоминаю, что продолжаю формировать группу на Аспен метод, которая стартует уже через 2 дня, и предлагаю послушать серию подкастов о том как продавать без кринжа, не чувствовать себя прилипалой, попрошайкой и барыгой, продавать без стыда и уверенно Обязательно слушать специалистам помогающих профессий: психологам, астрологам, тарологам, астропсихологам, коучам, менторам и др. Полезно будет и тем, кто просто …

❤68❤‍🔥10👍7🥰4🔥2

27 Sept 2026, 13:28 UTC≈6,810 views260 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Кому актуально про тему границ, о чем говорили в эфире - соберу и пришлю вам подборку подкастов 😘

❤162🔥54❤‍🔥33👍11

27 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC≈4,300 views54 reactionsread 30 September 2026
File

Пока я лечу зубы, вот вам несколько шикарных подкастов для принятия решения идти ли на Аспен метод Если дослушав до конца, вы поняли, что хотите не просто разобраться с собой, а РАБОТАТЬ С ЭТИМ, то программа и условия тут: https://lilyaspenacademy.pro/aspen-method-autumn Рассрочки есть — банковские и внутренняя. По всем вопросам пишите 😘 [email protected]

❤54

27 Sept 2026, 12:03 UTC≈6,970 views83 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Прямой Эфир сейчас: Про Джигана и Оксану - Тирана и Терпилу, финал.

❤56🔥20❤‍🔥7

27 Sept 2026, 11:51 UTC≈7,500 views296 reactions2 Starsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Если вам лень смотреть все три части интервью Собчак с Самойловой, то вот краткий пересказ:

😁159😢71❤39👍14💯9❤‍🔥4

27 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC≈7,160 views107 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Досмотрю, приду в эфир, если хотите

❤67❤‍🔥23💯13🥰4

27 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC≈7,170 views228 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Смотрю третью часть, на рассказе Ариэлла про батю с автоматом и на моменте когда зачитывали ее смски маме про то, что «он идет нас убивать» я чуть не разрыдалась… Понятно, что из этого инфоповода они выжимают максимум и делают так, чтобы Джигана было максимально сложно вернуться в РФ и забрать детей, но я совсем не думаю, что эта история сфабрикована…

❤131🤯53😢32💯7❤‍🔥3🗿2

26 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈9,310 views388 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Я досмотрела вторую часть интервью Оксаны Собчак … Жду третью, там Ариэлла будет говорить, но пока могу сказать, что все что я говорила о них в предыдущих разборах, о том, что эпизоды с передозом и насилием за закрытыми дверями происходили не раз, про созависимость и про то, что несмотря на развод они по прежнему созависимы - все подтверждается

❤210💯125👀50❤‍🔥3

25 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC≈10,100 views101 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Прямой Эфир. Болтаем про Оксану и Джигана и ту дичь что произошла

❤64❤‍🔥19🔥18

Showing the 12 most recent of 338 posts we hold for @lilyAspen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анастасия ko_sha
@koshechkiklub · 26,570
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
💭Инсайтовская форточка
@garikovainsight · 23,823
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Римма Карамова
@karamova_fm · 31,182
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Наталья Касарина
@kasarinan · 28,979
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
Андреященко Евгения. Aevgeniya
@aevgeniya_offical · 21,832
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
Мария Солодар | Интернет-маркетинг и фриланс
@marketing_Solodar · 22,142
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Alina Shpak
@alishka_shpak · 28,175
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Зинануёбтвоюмать
@zinanuebtvoumatt · 30,661
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Боровская | Академия Нейрофитнеса
@kanalsvoboden · 21,833
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
БЕЛАЯ КОМНАТА (Whiteroom)
@belajakomnata · 26,266
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Артем Репецкий
@artemrepetskyi · 25,346
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 29,377
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Михаил Фатеев
@mihailfateev · 22,871
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
Канал Елизаветы Устюговой
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 25,191
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 576,732
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Миллион на недвижимости
@million_na_nedvijke · 29,375
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
неНумерология с Перцевой
@ne_numerolog · 21,199
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Валера Гут | Ψ и AQ
@gutvaleriy · 29,373
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Записки Василиски
@vasilisa_delicia · 23,861
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Алина Корнева она же Вселенная
@korneva_life · 20,591
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 September 2026
O svidaniyah 🖤
@o_svidaniyah_tg · 28,101
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Дневник Аминема
@aminanewss · 22,808
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Ольга Чебыкина
@chebykina_o · 26,773
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Наташа Жукова.Рядом 🫂
@zhukova_ryadom · 28,084
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lily Aspen” (@lilyAspen), 79,238 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilyAspen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.