Константин Симонов за кадром «Своей правды» прокомментировал ситуацию с топливом в стране. Следующий эпизод – завтра. Подписаться на «Свою правду» | MAX
👍15🤔3👎1

Channel
@svoyapravdantv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,028subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001652345717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @svoyapravdantv |
| Description | Официальный канал программы «Своя правда» с Романом Бабаяном на НТВ. Мы ВКонтакте: https://vk.com/svoya_pravda_ntv Роман Бабаян: 🔗 https://t.me/robabayan 🔗 https://vk.com/babayan.official 🔗 https://zen.yandex.ru/id/622f835d940c234438ff71aa |
| Created | 2 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/svoyapravdantv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 10,028 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 10,025 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 10,013 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 10,018 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 10,017 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 10,020 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 10,017 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 10,016 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 10,024 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 10,031 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 10,031 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (11 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 62,393 |
| Reactions total | 1,205 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,481 reactions across 38 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 774 | 52.3% | |
| ❤ | 426 | 28.8% | |
| 🔥 | 121 | 8.17% | |
| 🤔 | 63 | 4.25% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 1.82% | |
| 😢 | 22 | 1.49% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 1.28% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 0.878% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 0.54% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.203% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.203% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.068% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.068% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,481reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Константин Симонов за кадром «Своей правды» прокомментировал ситуацию с топливом в стране. Следующий эпизод – завтра. Подписаться на «Свою правду» | MAX
👍15🤔3👎1
▪ВС РФ освободили Новосолошино в Запорожской области и Андреевскую Общину в ДНР. ▪Верховный суд отклонил апелляцию «Яблока» и оставил в силе решение о снятии партии с выборов. ▪ФСБ задержала жителя Севастополя, который собирал для СБУ информацию об объектах Минобороны. ▪СВР: Запад планирует обвинить РФ в поставках оружия для ОПГ в Латинской Америке. ▪Зампредседателя псковского «Яблока» иноагента Шлосберга* пригов…
👍19❤2👎2🔥2
Новая тактика российских ударов фактически лишила Украину выхода к Чёрному морю, а это блокирует военную логистику и рушит экономику киевского режима, заявил ведущий «Своей правды» Роман Бабаян. «Нужно просто продолжать и делать то, что мы делаем». 🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
❤16👍8👎1
«Начиналось с касок, а дошло до ударов вглубь территории». Журналист Андрей Сидорчик — о том, что конструктивные переговоры по Украине невозможны, поскольку Запад лишь усиливает давление на Россию. 🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
👍21😁1
«Ему не жалко Украину, не жалко сограждан». Позиция Зеленского, который отказывается от мира, останется неизменной, несмотря на мощные удары возмездия ВС РФ и продвижение наших войск, поскольку его действия зависят от приказов из Лондона, заявил публицист Николай Стариков. 🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
❤8👍6👎1🤬1
Почему Трамп не передает Украине ракеты-перехватчики для комплексов Patriot или лицензии на их производство? Американский журналист Майкл Бом говорит, что есть две причины: дефицит запасов и дефицит доверия. Ведущий «Своей правды» Роман Бабаян не согласен — он считает это лишь отмазками. 🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
❤11👍8👎1
Зеленский с помощью терактов хочет «убедить русских, что они проиграли», считает журналист Андрей Сидорчик. По его словам, именно для этого Киев массово бьет по гражданским объектам, но не стоит говорить, что Вашингтон не имеет отношения к этим атакам: «Мы прекрасно знаем, кто наводит, кто планирует, кто обеспечивает». 🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
👍10❤9😁1
Вашингтон ошибается, думая, что Россию можно принудить к миру на условиях Запада, заявил американский журналист Майкл Бом. «Трамп и его советники плохо понимают Россию, ее историю и менталитет. Объяснили бы им, что значит выражение „За ценой не постоим“». 🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
❤9👍8👎1
По следам прошедшей программы (14.08.26). Полный выпуск — https://clck.ru/3VEeLv
👍27❤3
Или слушайте аудиоверсию.
👍36❤4👎1
В студии «Своей правды» обсудили визит нашего президента на Итуруп, реакцию Японии и обстановку на Дальнем Востоке в целом, а также пиратство против российских судов, ситуацию с ракетами Patriot, наши отношения с США и прогнозы по дальнейшему течению СВО. Смотрите, где вам удобно: ВКонтакте Telegram МАХ Rutube Сайт НТВ
👍45❤5👎2
Моя правда #138 📌 Опять наш? 📌 Заскулил о перемирии? 📌 Помощи не будет? Смотрите ВКонтакте: https://vkvideo.ru/video-124911520_456240207?t=3m29s Смотрите на RuTube: https://rutube.ru/video/5e7f18fbc2067eb688b9dd063c900f15/
❤31👍31👎1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @svoyapravdantv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 911,033 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@svoyapravdantv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Своя правда» с Романом Бабаяном” (@svoyapravdantv), 10,028 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svoyapravdantv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.