Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Килинкаров Спиридон

Channel

Килинкаров Спиридон

@KilinkarovSpiridon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

29,262subscribers

+178 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001695449611
TypeChannel
Username@KilinkarovSpiridon
Created23 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/KilinkarovSpiridon

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,08429,26229,1736 August 2026 — 29,084 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,084 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,089 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,097 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,104 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,106 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,120 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,123 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,133 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,170 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,172 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,159 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,158 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,134 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,158 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,142 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,140 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,145 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,141 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,174 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,217 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,214 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,203 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,206 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,199 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,204 subscribers6 September 2026 — 29,199 subscribers9 September 2026 — 29,224 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,219 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,205 subscribers15 September 2026 — 29,196 subscribers26 September 2026 — 29,262 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net +178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,057–29,289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 21:1529,262+66
15 Sept 2026, 06:4029,196-9
13 Sept 2026, 15:2129,205-14
11 Sept 2026, 21:3629,219-5
9 Sept 2026, 12:5629,224+25
6 Sept 2026, 06:2029,199-5
3 Sept 2026, 21:2029,204+5
2 Sept 2026, 09:3429,199-7
1 Sept 2026, 07:0429,206+3
31 Aug 2026, 05:0629,203-11
30 Aug 2026, 04:2529,214-3
29 Aug 2026, 07:2529,217+43
28 Aug 2026, 10:5729,174+33
27 Aug 2026, 10:1229,141-4
26 Aug 2026, 08:5529,145+5
25 Aug 2026, 09:5229,140-2
24 Aug 2026, 12:1229,142-16
22 Aug 2026, 20:5529,158+24
21 Aug 2026, 12:4229,134-24
20 Aug 2026, 12:3529,158first reading

Engagement

224 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 29,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,120
106 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
106
of 224 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held224 (2 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total542,562
Reactions total24,439
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Oct 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,650
Videos
≈3,810
Links
≈5,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
35m 37s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

52,387 reactions across 223 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁11,43621.8%
👍10,40019.9%
💯9,61618.4%
🤣5,74211.0%
🤡2,8005.34%
🤔1,4572.78%
🤬1,4272.72%
🔥1,3082.50%
❤1,2182.33%
🤮1,0632.03%
👏9381.79%
💩7741.48%
💊6371.22%
🙏5251.00%
🤯3550.678%
👎3530.674%
🤷‍♂2860.546%
😱2810.536%
🖕2620.5%
😢2420.462%
31 further kinds1,2672.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 224 of the 224 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52,648 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 224 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 224 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KilinkarovSpiridon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 224 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC802 views57 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Я просто ржу, когда украинские политические эксперты, всерьез обсуждают возможное покушение на Штилермана со стороны России, который сам опроверг эту информацию. И ведь ни у кого не вызывает сомнение, зачем России покушаться на Штилермана, который пи@дит деньги из оборонного бюджета Украины. 😂😂😂

😁44👍10💯3

1 Oct 2026, 11:35 UTC≈3,250 views201 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @legitimniy

#слухи Наш источник сообщает, что удары по ЛЭП, вышкам и южному мосту в Киеве - это некая демонстрация и тестирование новой стратегии. Такими ударами Кремль передает некое публичное послание Банковой, что если не пойдут на мир, то дальнейшая игра пойдет по новому более катастрофичному сценарию для Украины. Кремль сможет положить ЛЭПы и тогда вся работа энергетических объектов остановится, а страна погрузится в тотал…

👍152🔥26💯15❤8

1 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC≈3,980 views270 reactionsread 1 October 2026

172 миллиона рублей похитили у московского пенсионера Мошенники вышли на внука мужчины и представились ему «сотрудниками» ФСБ, Росфинмониторинга и Минцифры. Они угрозами убедили мальчика открыть дверь в доме дедушки, вскрыли сейф и похитили оттуда сбережения. Каждый раз, когда читаю такие новости, просто ахереваю, это что за такие пенсионеры, у которых дома по 2-3 миллиона долларов гробовых. 😂😂😂

💯218😨27😁10❤5🤬5🤣4🤔1

1 Oct 2026, 05:26 UTC≈4,230 views202 reactionsread 1 October 2026

В Тернопольской области полицейские будут ездить на новых автомобилях Tesla. Таким образом, в регионе будет реализован пилотный проект по энергонезависимости. Все для фронта, все для победы! 😂😂😂

😁139🤣44🤯13🤡5🤔1

30 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC≈4,090 views216 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @solovievliveVideo

⭕⭕⭕⭕ Если мы понимаем свою сущность, свою природу и суть противостояния, то для успеха на внешней арене мы должны изменить ряд подходов. Во-первых, понять, в чём заключаются наши национальные интересы, и полностью отказаться от более чем странной концепции невмешательства. Если наши интересы требуют вмешательства в дела других стран, значит, надо вмешиваться — начиная с мягких и заканчивая крайне жёсткими методами. И…

👍133💯64❤11💊5🔥2🤔1

30 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC≈4,400 views140 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @bankser

Россия категорически отрицает наличие у себя политзаключенных, поэтому их освобождение в обмен на смягчение санкций не обсуждалось, заявил Песков. @bankser

👍117😁16🤔3👏2🤡2

30 Sept 2026, 12:21 UTC≈4,420 views135 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @stranauaPhoto

Самолет FlyDubai после нападения одного пилота на второго сумели посадить пилоты из Украины и РФ, которые летели этим рейсом как пассажиры, сообщает Israel Hayom. Им удалось стабилизировать полет Boeing и благополучно приземлиться в аэропорту в Саудовской Аравии. Напомним, сперва появилась информация, что из Украины и РФ были основные пилоты, между которым произошла поножовщина. Однако вскоре её опровергли. Сайт "…

❤69👍43😁18🤷‍♂5

29 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC≈4,240 views134 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @solovievlivePhoto

The Atlantic пишет о якобы готовящейся сделке между Москвой и Вашингтоном. Издание считает, что Трамп согласился на идею своего спецпосланника отменить некоторые антироссийские санкции в обмен на освобождение Россией ряда заключенных. «Эта новая инициатива, находящаяся пока на ранней стадии и ранее не освещавшаяся в СМИ, обещает одновременно способствовать достижению нескольких целей Трампа. Она поможет реинтегриро…

🤔97🤡17❤8🥱7👎3👍2

29 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC≈4,690 views111 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @stranaua

В Йемене объявили всеобщую мобилизацию на фоне продвижения хуситов в районе стратегического пролива Баб-эль-Мандеб. Решение принял правительство страны, поддерживаемое Саудовской Аравией. Напомним, хуситы в последнее время достигли больших успехов в наступлении, взяв под контроль все побережье Йемена у Красного моря. Сейчас они продолжают продвигаться на юг, тесня правительственные силы. При этом хуситы контролир…

👍89🔥14❤6🤡2

29 Sept 2026, 05:19 UTC≈4,660 views157 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @stranauaPhoto

Еврокомиссия отказалась выделить Киеву €220 млн на поддержку фермеров, сообщает Bloomberg со ссылкой на министра аграрной политики и продовольствия Высоцкого. Ранее Украина обращалась к ЕС с просьбой о предоставлении поддержки аграрному сектору — в дополнение к той финансовой помощи, которую блок уже оказывает. Сайт "Страна" | X/Twitter | Прислать новость/фото/видео | Реклама на канале | Помощь

👍82😁56🤡16❤2🤔1

28 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC≈6,390 views273 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Украинские олигархи Пинчук и Ахметов, решили приостановить работу своих меткомбинатов. Понять их можно, они решили не играться с войной и обезопасить свою собственность. Только возникает вопрос, а что делать семьям тысяч украинцев, им как быть? Может идея в том, что они решили в две руки сыграть с режимом, нет работы, вперёд на фронт! Закрылось предприятие, значит нет брони, все на войну!!! Олигархи вывели свои предп…

🤬162💯64🤷‍♂22🤔7😁5❤3👎3🙏3

28 Sept 2026, 18:08 UTC≈5,250 views338 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Кайя Каллас может позволить себе заявлять всякую херню, типа, надо антибалистику передать Украине, ей избираться не надо. А что прикажите делать лидерам национальных государств Европы, которые настрощали своих избирателей, что Россия вот-вот нападет, как же можно ослабить оборонный потенциал страны?!!!!! Я, конечно знал, что она небольшого ума барышня, пригляделся, полная идиотка! Самое страшное, что она этого н…

💯257😁65👏15🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 224 posts we hold for @KilinkarovSpiridon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,459
#1
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,712,089
#2
Скабеева
@skabeeva · 218,001
#3
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 491,085
#4
Голос Мордора
@golosmordora1 · 148,784
#5
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,028
#6
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 610,756
#7
Захар Прилепин
@zakharprilepin · 224,352
#8
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 920,149
#9
Осташко! Важное
@ostashkonews · 425,633
#10
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,696,520
#11
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,041,345
#12
САРДАРЯН
@sardaryanh · 49,472
#13
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 210,279
#14
Шейх Тамир
@sheyhtamir1974 · 370,763
#15
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 425,302
#16
Выпускайте КракенаZ!
@rlz_the_kraken · 506,668
#17
ВЕСЕЛОВСКИЙ🇷🇺
@VSMihalych67 · 14,487
#18
Радио Стыдоба
@Radiostydoba · 93,759
#19
UKR LEAKS
@ukr_leaks · 101,940
#20
КОРНИЛОВ
@kornilov1968 · 118,975
#21
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,116,748
#22
ГАСПАРЯН
@ASGasparyan · 174,806
#23
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,231
#24
Профессор смотрит в мiръ. Авторский Анонимный канал Дмитрия Евстафьева
@dimonundmir · 206,991
#25
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев
@dtlive · 67,878
#26
КАРНАУХОВ
@sskarnaukhov · 113,500
#27
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 194,186
#28
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,684,000
#29
Рамзай
@ramzayiegokomanda · 152,271
#30
МАРДАН
@mardanaka · 209,055
#31
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 754,703
#32
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#33
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,014,901
#34
Юлия Витязева
@vityzeva · 48,619
#35
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,375
#36
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 473,335
#37
Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition
@epoddubny · 574,104
#38
Валентин Богданов
@valentinbogdanov · 40,952
#39
Сладков+
@sladkov_plus · 702,738
#40
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 452,487
#41
Олег Царёв
@olegtsarov · 403,085
#42
ШАХНАЗАРОВ
@iikhu · 154,817
#43
WarGonzo
@wargonzo · 743,058
#44
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ
@DDrobnitski · 79,704
#45
Маргарита Симоньян
@margaritasimonyan · 510,816
#46
Дорогая Хурма
@expensive_hurma · 151,300
#47
КЛИНЦЕВИЧ
@aklintsevich · 53,442
#48
МЕРКУРИ
@imerkouri · 58,752
#49
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 277,422
#50
Мария Захарова
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 462,030
#51
МИГ России
@mig41 · 480,262
#52
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 493,692
#53
ЗАРУБИН
@zarubinreporter · 457,979
#54
Повёрнутые на войне 🇷🇺
@voenacher · 662,978
#55
Кузичев
@a_kuzichev · 85,177
#56
Мир Михаила Онуфриенко
@mikle1on · 487,822
#57
Андрей Медведев
@MedvedevVesti · 183,029
#58
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 568,800
#59
Военкор Котенок
@voenkorKotenok · 312,383
#60
Олеся Лосева
@Losevatalks · 38,752
#61
Open Ukraine| Открытая Украина
@OpenUkraine · 181,100
#62
Неофициальный Безсонов
@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV · 244,302
#63
Александр Семченко
@AleksandrSemchenko · 237,988
#64
Сергей Михеев
@ironlogica · 210,976
#65
Абзац
@absatzmedia · 131,994
#66
Репортёр Руденко V
@RtrDonetsk · 154,918
#67
Николай Стариков
@nstarikovru · 85,727
#68
Белорусский силовик
@belarusian_silovik · 451,117
#69
ANNA NEWS
@anna_news · 233,975
#70
СИЛОВИКИ 🇷🇺
@SIL0VIKI · 183,547
#71
Саня во Флориде
@sanya_florida · 912,324
#72
ШЕЙНИН
@GardeZ66 · 252,201
#73
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 481,589
#74
#МОНТЯН!
@montyan2 · 300,138
#75
Мадуро - не дура
@apleonkov · 17,461
#76
Русский тарантасъ
@DmitriySteshin · 136,783
#77
ГОЛОВАНОВ
@romagolovanov · 93,391
#78
Якеменко
@yakemenko · 30,445
#79
ZАПИСКИ VЕТЕРАНА 🇷🇺
@notes_veterans · 276,109
#80
Военный обозреватель
@new_militarycolumnist · 205,255
#81
Военный Осведомитель
@milinfolive · 615,168
#82
Евгений Попов
@vladivostok1978 · 55,820
#83
Abbas Djuma
@Abbasdjuma · 60,693
#84
АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА
@arx_spn · 1,028,205
#85
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 527,032
#86
РОДИОН_МИРОШНИК
@miroshnik_r · 21,363
#87
Минобороны России
@mod_russia · 650,718
#88
Кот Костян - официальный канал🇷🇺
@kotreal · 156,556
#89
Хазин
@khazinml · 243,844
#90
Гигин. 110-й Партизанский
@Gigin_Vadim · 8,860
#91
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,120
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

САРДАРЯН
@sardaryanh · 49,472
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
РУВИКИ
@ruwikiofficial · 23,053
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 September 2026
Тайная История
@secrethIstory12 · 22,397
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ
@dr_alex_sosnowski · 114,231
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Роман Бабаян
@robabayan · 29,555
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
КОРНИЛОВ
@kornilov1968 · 118,975
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
ВЛАДИМИР СОЛОВЬЁВ NEWS
@SolovievVRNews · 22,794
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Вечер с Владимиром Соловьевым и 60 минут
@shilopravdy · 29,731
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев
@dtlive · 67,878
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Валентин Богданов
@valentinbogdanov · 40,952
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
МЕСТО ВСТРЕЧИ 📺
@mesto_vstrechi_ntv · 147,539
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
СЕРГИЕНКО Владимир
@vvsergienko · 41,623
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
БАГДАСАРОВ
@sbagdasarov · 47,960
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
РОДИОН_МИРОШНИК
@miroshnik_r · 21,363
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
КЛИНЦЕВИЧ
@aklintsevich · 53,442
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Владимир Аватков
@avatkov · 25,081
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
Олеся Лосева
@Losevatalks · 38,752
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q12116437 on Wikidata, read 27 September 2026
LabelSpiridon Kilinkarov
DescriptionUkrainian public and political figure

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Килинкаров Спиридон” (@KilinkarovSpiridon), 29,262 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KilinkarovSpiridon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.