Сашка ноткоинер ливнул с чата стикеров по причине «тегали без уважения»
❤1👍1
Signed FlyingHigh

Channel
@TopTapEn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,562,399subscribers
-22,484 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002067369066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TopTapEn |
| Description | Best Crypto games Ads and Collab (only) — @WTpros |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TopTapEn |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 1,562,399 | -4,877 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 1,567,276 | -4,305 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 1,571,581 | -3,852 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 1,575,433 | -3,826 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 1,579,259 | -5,624 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 1,584,883 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 1,584,883 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 November 2025 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,810 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
262 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 177 | 67.6% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 6.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2025 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TopTapEn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 November 2025 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сашка ноткоинер ливнул с чата стикеров по причине «тегали без уважения»
❤1👍1
Signed FlyingHigh
🏰 Check Your TON Wallet for a Zargates Airdrop If you have ever been active on TON and have a TON wallet, check it right now. It is highly likely that you received an airdrop from Zargates in the form of gift boxes. The floor price for unopened boxes is currently approaching 4 TON. This steady growth is driven by players opening the boxes to assemble Orc teams, which drop from these chests. You have two options: …
❤69👍10
Signed FlyingHigh
⚡️ Connect your TON wallets to Zargates ‼️ Deadline — December 22. It’s better to do it now so you don’t forget later. The team plans to drop boxes to users who meet the criteria. The boxes will contain stickers. According to the information I have, these stickers will have utility, and you’ll need to collect them for specific purposes. Both the stickers and the boxes themselves will be tradable on the secondary m…
❤34👍7🔥2
Signed FlyingHigh
📣 Mr Freeman — the whitelist checker is live https://checker.mf0.io/ https://checker.mf0.io/ https://checker.mf0.io/ I got 5 GTD + 10 FCFS, including: 1 GTD for ambassador program 4 GTD for burned black ones 10 FCFS for burned white ones If you have guaranteed spots (GTD) — send ETH to your wallet at roughly $3 per sticker. I have 5 GTD, so that’s about $15 in ETH; I’ll send $20 to be safe. This covers Rarible fe…
❤10👍7🔥3
Signed чайный барон 🍃
How to verify your whitelist if you burned stickers: 1. From the wallet you used to burn stickers, send 0.01 TON to yourself. Find this transaction in your history and copy the tonviewer link. 2. Send it to @nosignalsupportbot with the note “verification”. 3. On tonviewer, search your wallet address and find burn transactions — they look like NFT transfers to craon-wallet.ton. 4. Send all burn transaction links to t…
❤10🔥3👍2
Signed чайный барон 🍃
Mr Freeman update The project has been pretty quiet in Telegram lately and most activity has moved to Discord. Still, there’s something important you need to do right now. Tomorrow there’s a free NFT mint on Ethereum. To participate, go to the bot and connect your Ethereum wallet in the Quests section. If luck is on your side, you’ll get a whitelist spot and access to a potentially valuable NFT. Confirmed info: An…
❤5👍2🔥2
Signed чайный барон 🍃
↔ New listing on Bitget and an opportunity to grab a share of the tokens allocated for the promo Our friends at Bitget continue to deliver solid listings. Talus is a project focused on on-chain automation for AI agents. Today is their TGE. The $US token is launching on Bitget as well as on a number of other top-tier exchanges. To celebrate the token launch, Talus together with Bitget is running a promo campaign ope…
❤11
Signed FlyingHigh
Trump announced crypto game with massive rewards in $TRUMP token. Pre-registration available now. Join Invite your friends. It can be huge.
❤5👍5
Signed FlyingHigh
Top Tap Crypto Games pinned «This channel's audience became completely inactive. From now all news about Telegram-related projects will be posted only in our main channel, Russian-speaking @toptaptap. If you still want to read and stay with us — you can use a translator. Maybe in future…»
This channel's audience became completely inactive. From now all news about Telegram-related projects will be posted only in our main channel, Russian-speaking @toptaptap. If you still want to read and stay with us — you can use a translator. Maybe in future this channel will be transformed into something new. I will notice about this in advance. Big news will be still posted here.
👍7❤4
Signed FlyingHigh
😻 Top Tap Restructuring Part 2. Moving Forward It’s obvious that surviving in a dying mini-app market is becoming impossible. And it’s equally obvious that we don’t want to die along with the market. At this point, we have to tighten the belts to have any chance of staying afloat. For now, the content will remain the same — about mini-apps and the Telegram ecosystem — since there are still things we want to share…
👍12❤1
Signed FlyingHigh
😻 Top Tap Restructuring Part 1. Let’s take a sober look at what’s happening around us Friends, we have to admit that the mini-apps market has been in stagnation for quite a while now after a series of scams — Hamster killed hope, NotPixel took the money, Bombi destroyed any remaining belief in something good. We haven’t seen any reasonable listings on TON for a year. Thanks to Starfall we occasionally spot that s…
❤7
Signed FlyingHigh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TopTapEn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 711,896 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
8 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Top Tap Crypto Games” (@TopTapEn), 1,562,399 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TopTapEn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.